ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Sustainable development, FFR160

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 27
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Monica Månhammar»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 9 33%

Around 20 hours/week» 15 55%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 11%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

27 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 2 7%

50%» 1 3%

75%» 7 25%

100%» 17 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- but the lecturer always cancel courses because of sickness... hope that they can reschedule before hand. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 7%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 3%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 11 42%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 12 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It seems like the goal had changed this year, because there was not so much attention on tools to analyze the environmental impact that the goal said is going to be. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- a "good understanding" is a very relative concept !» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 4%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 23 92%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all» 1 4%

To some extent» 10 40%

Yes, definitely» 9 36%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 5 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- A lot a questions are taken from previous years exams, which makes the people writing the questions lazy. This is not an ok behavior for a top Swedish university.» (To some extent)
- I think an oral exam or a home exam would much better provide the opportunity to show whether we understood the concepts or not. » (To some extent)
- Some of the questions where more about how well you where able to communicate in the way the examiners asks for and don"t if you understood the subject.» (To some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.26

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent» 3 11%

Some extent» 7 25%

Large extent» 14 51%

Great extent» 3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent» 6 22%

Some extent» 6 22%

Large extent» 11 40%

Great extent» 4 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- I think that some of the papers in the literature was to old. When I saw how old some of they where I didn"t trust them and especially not the papers that had numbers presented in them. I figure that a lot must have happened in this field the last years and especially after 1997. Maybe some of the papers can be updated. » (Small extent)
- course compendium of low quality, not always updated, too big, with a lot of overlaps or out of the subject, and nothing about the schedule, the teaching, etc.» (Small extent)
- Should be updated though - literature from 1996 isn"t that encouraging... Also should there be a broader difference of authors of the literature.» (Large extent)
- The articles were very long, and the letters very small, this made it hard to take all in» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

27 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 3%

Rather well» 17 62%

Very well» 9 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- The lectures was sometimes uploaded late. It is good to have them before the lectures so that it is possible to take them with you and take notes on the slides. » (Rather well)
- Sometimes confusing, like the schedule for seminars.» (Rather well)
- Except when Time-Edit isn"t being updated when there are changes of locals.» (Very well)
- Very good that you got an email if the lecture was cancelled and when it started at 9 instead of 8!» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

27 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 18%

Very good» 19 70%

I did not seek help» 3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- There was no information about how to contact if you had a problem with the hand in assignments. Maybe there should be more information about where to get help. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

27 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 8 29%

Very well» 14 51%

I did not seek cooperation» 5 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

27 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 1 3%

Adequate» 20 74%

High» 5 18%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- It was hard to know how much work one should put on the seminar preparations, but in the end I understood that I had put far too much time on that. So, the workload was a bit uneven. Very calm when we didn"t have any preparations, and a lot, when we had.» (Adequate)
- I lot to read, but we managed to do it.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

27 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 2 7%

Adequate» 15 55%

High» 8 29%

Too high» 1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Well planned, not high workload in the two courses the same week.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor» 1 3%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 19%

Good» 17 65%

Excellent» 3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It"s an inspiring course, but I can"t say that I"ve learnt anything in particular or heard anything tht I didn"t know before. If it"s supposed to work as inspiration, there could be much more emphasis on recommendations on literature and recommendations on how to find relevant information on the subject on your own.» (Good)
- The seminars could have been more challenging, as it is now, some students arrive, doesn"t say a word and then leave.» (Good)
- I especially enjoyed the guest lectures and the seminars.» (Good)
- It was a very interesting and good course. I learnt a lot and recommended it to all my friends» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The seminars»
- seminars»
- the seminar about land use»
- Seminars and hand-ins.»
- seminars»
- the gestlectures »
- The guest lectures!»
- the very interesting guest lectures»
- the guestlecturers»
- the guest lectures.»
- Seminars and overall how the lecture where done.»
- seminars»
- Seminars, guest lectures»
- Overall good lecturers, but I really appreciated the guest lectures!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- not sure»
- More information about how the recycling actually is working: visit a recycling station in Gothenburg.»
- the preparatory work for third seminar is a lot of work. and it is not easy to find a way for calculations, could be softened for net year.»
- That the lecture about the seminarie should been arlyer so how more time too prepar the handin but also that total three lecture was canceld and two of them was in a row before the last hand in.»
- To have lectures which are relevant to the seminars before the seminars so you have time for the peparations.»
- Maybe there should be possible to go more into the alternative energy sources and not only talk about bioenergy. Also to get a guest lecture about nuclear power with another view than a negative view might be good.»
- the compendium.»
- Don"t reuse exam questions.»
- Type of exam»
- The form of some exam questions. May do an oral exam in those question that were hard to interpret? It"s easier to show what you know if you realize that the reciever don"t get the message.»

16. Additional comments

- nope»
- the guest lectures were very interesting and gives you insights how to work with sustainable development»
- seminar should be organized more efficiently and more effectively. it"s better to state some key topics beforehand, allowing us do more preparation.»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.26
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från