|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Introduction to Integrated Circuit Design, Lp 1 Ht11, MCC091Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-10-24 - 2011-11-04 Antal svar: 20 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 18% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your background1. My study background is:19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.84 2. I am currently enrolled in this master programme:19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.57 - I am an exchange student.» (Not enrolled in master programme) Your own effort3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.15 - In exam week, it may be 40 hours. » (Around 25 hours/week) 4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.63 - Lectures were helpful but the contents were lot to grasp in 2 hrs.It was hard to take notes and listen to class. Why not have a video recording of lectures? » (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.5. How understandable are the course goals?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - I can"t say it was easy since the exam did not correspond with the earlier years exams.» (The goals are difficult to understand) 6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.06 - Lab exercises were not really challenging, if there were any probelms, then only about struggling with the system rather than with the learning content. » (No, the goals are set too low) 7. Did the examination, including hand-in problem and pre-lab assignments assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 - The exam was very hard and even though I studied 5 full days, I felt that I could not answer the questions. It was too much to do and the time ran out.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - tutorials by professors were more helpful than the lecture part as they gave an idea of how to solve the problem» (Large extent) 9. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the four labs?Matrisfråga- Lab 4 was actually easy, but because it was a new lab it was difficult to understand what to do. It also seemed meaningless, I did not learn anything during the lab.» Lab 1 Inverter digital and analog
Genomsnitt: 2.7 Lab 2 Comparator schematics
Genomsnitt: 2.95 Lab 3 Comparator layout
Genomsnitt: 3.4 Lab 4 Standard-cell characterization
Genomsnitt: 3.7 10. How do you rate the time the in-lab part of each lab took you?Matrisfråga- Often unnecessary time-consuming due to software problems» Lab 1 Inverter, digital and analog
Genomsnitt: 3.05 Lab 2 Comparator schematics
Genomsnitt: 3.35 Lab 3 Comparator layout
Genomsnitt: 3.7 Lab 4 Standard-cell characterization
Genomsnitt: 3.75 11. How do you rate the time the prelab assignment took you for the different labs?Matrisfråga- Some of them were ok, but there Should be clearer instructions. We students also have precious time, and it"s annoying that everyone thinks that we can spend 6-8 hours trying to solve a problem where there are a few parameters missing.» Lab 1 Inverter digital and analog
Genomsnitt: 3.2 Lab 2 Comparator schematics
Genomsnitt: 3.5 Lab 3 Comparator layout
Genomsnitt: 3.3 Lab 4 Standard-cell characterization
Genomsnitt: 3 12. How do you rate the difficulty of the three hand-in problems?Matrisfråga- It is hard because the hand-in is handed out before it is lectured. I can understand the point that if you have worked with the problem yourself, you will be more active on the lecture. Thou I think that the bonus point should be changed so that bonus points are given when a correct solution is handed in within one week after the first deadline.» Hand-in problem 1: Zero detect cell & amplifier
Genomsnitt: 3.52 Hand-in problem 2: Inverter delay + gain
Genomsnitt: 3.36 Hand-in problem 3: Prefix comparator and adders
Genomsnitt: 2.84 13. How do you rate the time each of the hand-in assignmetns took you?Matrisfråga- It took quite long time because you had to use non-lectured techniques.» Hand-in 1: Zero-detect cell + simple amplifier
Genomsnitt: 3.68 Hand-in 2: Inverter delay + gain
Genomsnitt: 3.78 Hand-in 3: Prefix comparator & adders
Genomsnitt: 2.94 14. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - Kjell"s book is not that good.» (?) 15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - Unorganized folders on ping pong and process paramter sheet was not available until four weeks into the course.» (Rather badly) Study climate16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - The opportunities in and outside class was good, but it was very poor during the labs. I was in the monday lab slot, and very often the lab assistants could not answer my questions.» (Rather poor) 17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - My lab partner and I worked separately and I think we both gained from that compared to if we had worked together.» (Rather poorly) 18. How was the course workload?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - It was ok but the way the teachers planned that we should learn was ridiculous. Not everyone learns through doing 35 hours of labs per week. We need to examples to calculate.» (High) 19. How was the total workload this study period?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.2 - W_MCC091/W_DAT092 = inf» (High) Summarizing questions20. What is your general impression of the course?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 - I think the course should test us that we understand and that we have the basic tools to solve basic problems. I did 10 different exams ending with the latest one (which I got a full score on). However I doubt that I even passed the one we got which is, to say the least, frustrating. I don"t agree at all with Jeppson"s idea of that the descriptions of problem should be fuzzy "because that"s the engineering way". It shouldn"t be how we learn the things we know, the most important thing should be what we know in the end.
Not only did the course planning make it hard to learn things (all we did during the exam period was to back-track old solutions because they werent clear). The exam didnt look anything like the earlier years exams. » (Poor) 21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lectures was good.»- -Textbook -style of teaching (solving problems in class, make calculations on the whiteboard, interact with students) -ability to earn points from homework and labs» - Exercises should be preserved.» - Hand-in problems are a good way of learning.» - The hand in assignments and the prelabs were rather good actually. Did not take too much time and you learned a lot from them. » - prelabs and hand-in assignements.» - tutorials they were really good» - Lectures and labs.» - The weekly hand-in and pre-lab routine» - The labs and the hand-ins were pretty good. The lectures were really good and the Q&A session was helpfull. » - The exercise class is essential to students to understand the theory.» - Everything was good and should be preserved to next year» 22. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The fourth lab. It was pointless.»- names of pdfs uploaded on pingpong - a chronological order, maybe by starting filenames with a number, would help much» - The lectures which are uploaded should be well organized. sometimes they caused confusion. There are some duplicate and uncompleted files.» - Better exam and eliminate software problems in lab.» - The last lab did not add any understanding. Change the bonus point system.» - The last lab has to go. It was completely worthless» - Change lab4, this was wortless.» - Remove the fourth lab or give some more information on what it was really about.» - Book. A small exercise booklet with many detailed solved questions. Solutions to old exams should be more detailed » - Provide more examples that are done correctly by the lecturer and then provide questions which can relate to the examples so that they can be solved. » - The digital parts of the course were actually very easy but the lectures made it look like they were difficult. So teaching strategy for the digital part can be looked into» - The exam should be more similar to older exams, since this is my (and many other students) understanding of preapering for it. The organization of the lecture slides on the webpage was a little bit confusing.» - The TA"s (mondays) were totally worthless, we knew more about the program then they did. (But the TA"s at friday were very good) So to next year, get TA"s that knows the program and assignments better than the students. In the first lessons Lena and Kjell had a kind of own discussion between them when one of them were teaching. I don"t know if this was because it was a knew course, but it was kind of confusing and you didn"t know if what was said was addressed to the class or just to the other teacher. The last lab was just strange, i haven"t learned anything from it. Because i don"t know what we did, cause our code didn"t work so Tung had to help us and then he rewrote large pieces of our code. It would have been better if we had got the files correct and then analysed the result.» - 1.The teaching time for analog part of this course, like the matching, and frequency response(poles), is not enough. Maybe such part can be cancelled and give more teaching in digital part. 2. Lab4 can be changed. 3. Additional topics about the second order effects may be added.» - It would be better is students have some brief information about the Software Cadence.» - Last Lab semes to technical. Maybe that knowledge can be posponed.» 23. Additional comments- The lab assistants on the monday lab slot didn"t offer much help. It seemed like they didn"t know the software.»- All in all, useful class with lots of interesting insights to the entire field of microelectronics» - It"s a shame that the teachers have no clue what is hard or not. We Swedish students will "only loose a few weeks of time", practicing on the resits. But what about the exchange students? The people from China that have to re-do it? I"m sorry but the course would get an "U" in my book without any hesitation.» - Solutions given in old exams were different from the method solved in class and also solving was very short it was difficult to understand why certain formulas were introduced.» - Provide an e-book of the course book by Kjell. Translate the last chapter of the book which is in Swedish to English. Update the book with latest technology.» - This course and the other course (DAT092) on the embedded program have a too high workload and i think it scares away people from the program when they realise that you have to work more than 50 hours a week.» - Thank you!» - The exam wasn"t the same level as expected, compared to previous exams. Perhaps on the layout students whould have to be tought some more than AOI, OAI and a Comparatorcell to be able to handle a halfadder. More examples of layouts was hard to come by. It feels wrong to have extra bonus points on the handins since students that already know each other from before are more likley to share knowledge how to solve the problems, making student not that wall conected look worse. Perhaps the bouspoints should not halt in getting score 3.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47%