Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced Topics in Computer Systems and Networks, Lp 1 Ht11, DAT145/DIT664
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-28 Antal svar: 21 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 13% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.21 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 10 | | 47% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 8 | | 38% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 9% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 1.76 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 21 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 2 | | 9% |
50%» | | 4 | | 19% |
75%» | | 6 | | 28% |
100%» | | 9 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 4.04 - I had collisions with other courses. I tried to attend the lectures which were home assignment-preparing.» (50%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?21 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 4% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 9 | | 42% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 11 | | 52% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.21 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 3 | | 14% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 17 | | 80% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?20 svarande
No, not at all» | | 3 | | 15% |
To some extent» | | 9 | | 45% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 35% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 2.3 - The exam was perhaps a bit too hard, it felt like focus in a couple of the topics was on things that we hadn"t treated that much in the course» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?21 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 9% |
Some extent» | | 7 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 11 | | 52% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 2.52 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?21 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 14% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 19% |
Large extent» | | 12 | | 57% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?21 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 2 | | 9% |
Rather well» | | 15 | | 71% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 19% |
Genomsnitt: 3.09 - But some assignments were not out in time.» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?21 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 2 | | 9% |
Rather good» | | 9 | | 42% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 42% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - Elad is very helpful.» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?21 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 9 | | 42% |
Very well» | | 11 | | 52% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 11. How was the course workload?21 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 12 | | 57% |
High» | | 6 | | 28% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 12. How was the total workload this study period?21 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 42% |
High» | | 11 | | 52% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?21 svarande
Poor» | | 4 | | 19% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 10 | | 47% |
Good» | | 7 | | 33% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.95 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The course structure»
- In my opinion the course was pointless in overall, could be just seminars that any1 could attend.»
- The parallel programming lab, practical and good. The other labs/home assignments were also good in the way that you learned about the topics, but the method of writing reports isn"t as fun as a practical lab. Maybe a purpose with this course to learn how to write reports, and nothing wrong with that.»
- The labs»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Would be good if not som many lectures are cancelled in the beginning of the period and also if the assignments could be given out earlier. I prefer not to have assignment deadlines after the exam, and since the last assignment was released so late you needed to study for the exam instead of doing the assingment.»
- Make the assignments available earlier in the course, not in the last weeks as the case with the last assignment this year.»
- teacher »
- Maybe some more exercise sessions»
16. Additional comments- The part dealing with Self-stabilization was almost an abstract topic and more time should be allocated to describe its principles and solve some sample problems. This topic is great and looks can have many applications in practice. »
- I think that the lectures that presented the home work assignments could be scheduled earlier in the reading period so that there is not too much to be done the last two couple of weeks before the exam. Thus, the workload of the course could be better balanced.»
- My understanding is that the course has had more topics earlier years (now four). I think the number of topics can be extended or the depth increased.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|