Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Experimental design, Lp1 2011, KBT120 and KKR031

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-11-06
Antal svar: 51
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Claes Niklasson»

1. What is your general impression of the course?

50 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 2%
Adequate»12 24%
Good»26 52%
Excellent»11 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

2. What type of student are you?

50 svarande

Master student»16 32%
Biotechnology student»31 62%
Exchange student»2 4%
PhD student»0 0%
Other»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

3. If you are a Master student - are you?

19 svarande

Swedish»17 89%
International»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.1

4. Gender?

49 svarande

Male»24 48%
Female»25 51%

Genomsnitt: 1.51

Your own effort

5. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

50 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 12%
Around 20 hours/week»15 30%
Around 25 hours/week»18 36%
Around 30 hours/week»8 16%
At least 35 hours/week»3 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.74

6. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

50 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 4%
50%»3 6%
75%»11 22%
100%»34 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

7. How understandable are the course goals?

Course goals:

After the course the students must be able to:

Plan experiments according to a proper experimental design. Choose the appropriate experimental design for different circumstances.

Analyse and evaluate experimental results properly according to different methods (ANOVA, regression ...)

Describe and apply fundamentals (in statistics and exp design) such as hypothesis testing, degrees of freedom, factorial design, and regression and so on according to course material.

Master students (KBT120):

Understand and apply fundamentals in multivariate data analysis (PCA and PLS).

50 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 4%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»16 32%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»32 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

8. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

48 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 2%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»44 91%
No, the goals are set too high»3 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

9. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

49 svarande

No, not at all»1 2%
To some extent»31 72%
Yes, definitely»11 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- I"ve attented all lectures, calculated all the tasks and done all old examinations. I kept up with the lectures in time, and yet the examination didn"t go well at all. I think this was because the examination contained numerous questions that never had been mentioned in any task, lecture or previous examination before.» (No, not at all)
- Some of the questions were reasonable but some were what I and many others feel, a lot away from what has been the main focus of the course. One of the 8p questions were a combination of blocking and replicates, something we never at all practiced and none of the excersizes handled. This is wrong, ok that there should be hard wuestions on an exam but the majority of the questions should at least be about the major focus of the course education, which I strongly feel is not the case! I am quite positive that I passed the exam but I dont think that it was a fair and relevant exam in the perspective of the main focus of the corse!» (To some extent)
- The exam was a bit odd comparing to older theses. It was sometimes hard to understand what really was the question even when asking.» (To some extent)
- Tentan testade målen men jag anser att tentan är svårare och innefattar mer än målen.» (To some extent)
- Many of the exam exercises were to large which made the time of thinking and understanding exercises none. It should not be the one that does the calculations on the shortest time that gets the most pionts, but it felt like that when you had done the exam.» (To some extent)
- There was one task on the exam that we hadn"t done before and I don"t think we should need to learn new things on the exam.» (To some extent)
- I was disapointed that the exam tasks focused on areas that had little or no emphasis at all on during the course. » (To some extent)
- the exammination was hard.» (To some extent)
- It was too big, five hours should be enough but it wasn"t. » (To some extent)
- Examination had many specialcases rather than the general cases, this was a supprice.» (To some extent)
- I think the exam was to big. More time or smaller exam is my recomend to next year» (To some extent)
- Somewhat, Though several questions with mixed problems that we had never seen before and the examples in the book gave ambigous solutions. Also, the focus of the exercises we were supposed to do did not cohere with the focus of the exam and the lectures!!» (To some extent)
- some of the questions on the exam, I felt could be enterpent in different ways, so the questions could have been a bit clearer.» (To some extent)
- The examination dit not correspond to the course as a whole.» (To some extent)
- I seems like the author of the exam just by random took a chapter from course book and asked a question about it, So the exercises and lectures dident reflect the examination. » (To some extent)
- Eximinationen använde delar som vi inte tagits upp i föreläsningarna, speglade inte kursinnehållet korrekt! Annars en bra tenta» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

10. How was the subject coverage in the lectures ?

50 svarande

They covered too little material»5 10%
About right»44 88%
They covered too much material»1 2%
I did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 1.92

11. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

50 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 4%
50%»2 4%
75%»10 20%
100%»36 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

12. To what extent did the lectures help you learning?

50 svarande

Small extent»6 12%
Some extent»20 40%
Large extent»22 44%
Great extent»2 4%
I did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 2.4

13. What do you think of the lectures of Claes Niklasson?

50 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 2%
Adequate»7 14%
Good»27 54%
Excellent»15 30%
Did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- Det är inget fel på Claes som föreläsare men det är inte tillräckligt för att kunna lösa övningsuppgifterna samt för att klara tentan.» (Adequate)
- More examples, just showing formulas does not help in understanding them. It is when you are shown how to use them you can understand them.» (Adequate)
- Powerpoint is hard to follow but i can understand why he has them.» (Adequate)
- He teaches at an acceptable pace and the notes are easy to understand» (Good)
- He do the regular error with power points - too much information, too fast.» (Good)
- clear content, but could be better planed in order not to rush through the second part of the lecture because of lack of time» (Good)
- Very good lextures that clearified som things in the book that was hard to understand» (Good)
- I think the lectures were really good. Its a pity though that the connection between Claes and Jan(who made the tasks and examination) was very bad. Jan didn"t seem to know the subjects mentioned in the lectures, and this led to an examination filled with questions that weren"t mentioned anywhere before. Basically it felt like anything that was mentioned in the coursebook could come on the examination, since Jan didn"t know what was mentioned during the examination. It didn"t really matter if you had attended previous lectures, calculated tasks and so on since something completely different could come on the examination. » (Good)
- I am truely honoured to have had lectures hold by professor Claes Niklasson.» (Excellent)
- Great lecturer, speaks loud and clear. Easy to understand.» (Excellent)

14. What do you think about the lectures by Carl Johan Franzen

50 svarande

Poor»2 5%
Fair»1 2%
Adequate»4 10%
Good»25 67%
Excellent»5 13%
Did not attend»13

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Känns lite märkligt när det kommer in en föreläsare och håller en föreläsning. Hade varit bättre om Claes höll i alla föreläsningar. Det blir mer sammanhängande då.» (Fair)
- It would be better to include some calculation examples in the lecture. » (Good)
- Only had one lecture, could have been more.» (Good)
- The best lecture, it was not as fast as the other ones. » (Good)
- He only had one lecture I think, but it was good.» (Good)
- Good lecturer, but it"s the same as the comment before. » (Good)

15. What do you think of the lectures by Mattias Eng?

49 svarande

Poor»1 2%
Fair»3 7%
Adequate»10 24%
Good»25 60%
Excellent»2 4%
Did not attend»8

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- The mvda part was in general totaly unmotiveted and wrong implemented. Eng did not even got a proper chance to do a good work.» (Fair)
- The materials given are slightly difficult to be understand. Might need to allocate more time to teach this part of the course (multi variate data analysis)» (Adequate)
- Helt okej men kändes inte som att de gav så mycket. Vid projektet användes tidigare öcningar som inlärning mer än föreläsningarna för min del.» (Adequate)
- A more efficient way to understand MVDA is through MVDA project. » (Good)
- Mattias did a good job, he is pedagogic and also corrected our reports good.» (Good)

16. This course was taught in English. How would you grade the teachers (lecture) ability to teach in English.

50 svarande

Poor»1 2%
Fair»2 4%
Adequate»9 18%
Good»29 58%
Excellent»9 18%
Did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- Some were very good some not as good.» (Fair)
- Ofta fungerade detta mycket bra, i och med att kursmaterialet är på engelska.» (Adequate)
- Claes, Carl och Matthias klarade det bra men Rodmar var ingen hit.» (Adequate)
- Hard to set a average grade due to large difference in english knowledge. Would like to avoid mentioning teachers but it is obvious that Jan rodmar has a lower grade of english and he haft to speak up found it extremely hard to hear him. This is unfortunate with regards to his extensive knowledge.» (Adequate)
- Claes was really good. Rodmar was not that good unfortunatly.» (Adequate)
- With the exception of Jan Rodmar.» (Adequate)
- The teachings of excersizes by Jan Rodmar in english is maybe not super good. » (Good)
- Good expect for the exercise teacher. He should be exchanged» (Good)
- Different between teachers. » (Good)
- Difficult to give a general grade since all but Rodmar(who I didn"t understand a word of) were very clear in english.» (Good)
- It was a bit hard to hear what our exercise teacher was saying. I think it would have been enough to get the solutions on paper. Because he was very good when you asked him in person.» (Good)
- It was difficult to hear what Rådmar was saying.» (Good)
- all but rodmar excellent» (Good)
- If you don"t include Rodmar... half of the words he says are in swedish and the other half you cant hear. (you almost cant hear the swedish words either)» (Excellent)

17. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

50 svarande

Small extent»2 4%
Some extent»18 36%
Large extent»28 56%
Great extent»2 4%
Did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 2.6

18. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

50 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 10%
Large extent»31 62%
Great extent»14 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Same as before, the examination did not reflect the subjects mentioned in the lectures very well, compared to previous examinations. » (Some extent)
- The book is not very well written, doesn"t explain why you should do it a certain way, sometimes hard to follow what they mean and very poor explaination of the theory.» (Some extent)
- Boken är väldigt bra med exempel och formler. Dock är den inte perfekt.» (Large extent)
- Good litterature» (Large extent)
- Very good book!» (Great extent)

19. What do you think about the tutorials/calculations?

48 svarande

Poor»6 12%
Fair»5 10%
Adequate»16 33%
Good»17 35%
Excellent»4 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- You cant hear a thing and you cant see what he wrights. » (Poor)
- After the first session I could not bring myself to attend another due to poor english and presentation skills from teacher.» (Poor)
- Jan shouln"t teach this course. You cant hear what he"s saying or what he"s writing» (Poor)
- It"s very hard to see what Rodmar writes and about impossible to hear since his English is half-way between Swedish and English.» (Poor)
- Rodmar is a very good teacher when he speaks swedish but it"s hard to understand him in english.» (Fair)
- Jan is a very good teacher and good at explaining. Unfortunately a lot of us students had a hard time hearing him during tutorials.» (Fair)
- More tutorials could be conducted to ease the understanding of the course» (Adequate)
- Its to time consuming when Rodmar write everything down on the blackboard that is important because many has a hard time to understand what hi is saying. It feels like time is not enough and that we miss out on some of the examples, or at least we miss out on how many examples we could have gotten teachings about in the same amount of time. » (Adequate)
- We had Jan Rodmar and it was quite difficult to hear/understand what he said during the tutorials. He was good when you talked to him one on one but when he talked infront of the whole class it was frustrating not to understand what he was saying.» (Adequate)
- Det höll inte samma nivå som tentan. Det är är den största bristen i kursen: man ges ingen möjlighet att träna på uppgifter som ligger på samma nivå som tentan. För mig är det oförståligt. » (Adequate)
- It was really hard to hear and understand what Rodmar said during the tutorials. » (Adequate)
- Jan have to speak up, the content is good but it is often hard to hear what he says and he often lagg behind schedual making it hard to keep up som times» (Adequate)
- It was sometimes hard to understand as Jan Rodmar did not really speak out loud. Apart from this he was great at explaining his calculations. He did better in swedish.» (Good)
- Carl Johan Franzen could have talked a bit louder» (Good)
- Problemet är att det förs på engelska, och då läraren inte har de bästa kunskaperna i det området faller något av informationen bort.» (Good)

20. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

48 svarande

Very badly»2 4%
Rather badly»2 4%
Rather well»29 60%
Very well»15 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Det är ganska rörigt. För att underlätta studenterna sökande efter viss information som lagt upp på hemsidan hade det varit bra att använda sig av mappar.» (Rather badly)
- I couldn"t attend to all of the classes and tried to print out the handouts on my own but they were to big fore the printers at school. If i removed all pictures from the pages i coud prin but, since almost all the information is in the pictures there weren"t much information left after doing this. §» (Rather badly)
- It was a bit messy on the course home page, because the materials was not sorted in folders.» (Rather well)

21. What do you think about the optimization project?

- Mycket roligt och givande. Man kunde verkligen sätta sig in och förstå det essentiella i kursen.»
- Great experiment.»
- It was a very good way to learn about the different methods.»
- it was oki. However I think its little bit tight planning with the MDVA project handing in at the same week as the optimization report»
- The optimization project provides useful hands on experience for students to carry out optimization. Knowledge learned during lecture can be applied fairly well into the project. It is an interesting way of learning»
- A very good project were one learnes a lot, and get a good feeling what the course is about.»
- Little too much waiting time, and if there is a help-list it is really annoying when the teachers sometimes dont stick to it because some student push their way in and demand answer for "just a quick question". Either no help list or stick to it 100%.»
- It was a good project, but the first three weeks was pretty useless. »
- The optimization project is well designed to suit this course outcome. It enhances my understanding and its applications in this course. »
- Funny, great application of the course!»
- It was good, I learned very much»
- It was fun and you learned quite a bit from it. »
- Great!»
- Väldigt roligt. Övningsledarna får mycket gott betyg. Dock kändes det lite onödigt att det skulle hålla genomgångarna på engelska när ingen i rummet har engelska som första språk. Tror inte att det är fördelaktigt på något sätt. »
- It was a great initiative and felt really thought through. You got the feeling that it could be a realistic situation that an engineer could be put up against. The thought about learning while doing was a fresh way of learning and it worked really good! This part of the course should definetly be kept for the coming years.»
- The best project so far on Chalmers. It was also fun with the price cermony.»
- FUN! It was interesting and instructive to work with the methods in practice, even if my Heureka-moment didn"t come until after the project.»
- Good»
- good. it"s was goos with a pre-hand-in.»
- good»
- It was good and well organized.»
- Really good to be able to see what it actually are learning and that expreimental design can be used virtually everywhere.»
- I liked it a lot.»
- it was good but the project leaders were... not so good.»
- Did not learn as much from this as I had hoped. »
- epic»
- Very good!»
- Great and interesting, where you use the skills you learn!»
- It was a good way of learning and introducing concepts before they were introduced in the lectures. »
- Fun and a good way of learning the theory. exciting with the competition. The students leading the project did a very good job.»
- It was really fun to do a project with some similarities to the real world.»
- Very good to learn about the extent of its applications.»
- Very fun and rewarding project. It gave an idea of how experimental design could be used in reality. »
- Was nice, the examinators could be clearer with what they meant with the returs, and also read them thoughly! Got a retur with comment that a we hadn"t included a certain value (was written one line below) and questions why we did some mandatory (and correct) calculations.»
- excellent! might be good to be able to choose working partner one self. since i hat a schedule clash a couple of times a week it would have been good to work with someone with the same schedule »
- It was fun.»
- Väldigt kul projekt! Mycket lärorikt! Bra att göra en tävling av det, sporrar oss studenter»

22. How well did the optimization/experimental design project support your learning of the subject?

50 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 4%
Adequate»6 12%
Good»27 54%
Excellent»15 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

23. How well do you think that the MVA (Multi Variate Analysis) project supports your learning about this subject?

Only for those who attended this part of the course.

49 svarande

Poor»5 13%
Fair»6 15%
Adequate»11 28%
Good»14 36%
Excellent»2 5%
Did not attend»11

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Totaly uselsess. It did not fit in the course at all and felt just unnecessary. Please if you want to implement this part in the cource, do it propertly, now we just got a step to step manual and a computer program to work with. The theory is unclear, the goal with this part is unclear and I still dont understand the main idea of the project. A tip for next year is to have mvda analysis as a part of the course the first three weeks and start the optimization project in week four then we have the theory for it. But most imortant, make it feel as a part of the course.» (Poor)
- It was hard to get the connection to the other parts in the course. It was also a hard deadline to have the hand in for the final report friday when the project started monday the same week.» (Fair)
- I felt that the MVDA-part of this course taught me more about the program SIMCA-P than it did the method of MVDA.» (Fair)
- Man hann inte lära sig jättemycket men det var roligt.» (Adequate)
- It was such a short project and part of the course but yes, the basics of MVDA was understood.» (Adequate)
- I think it was too late to start with it lv. 4 or when it was because the report was due in lv.6 so it felt really close to the examinationweek.» (Adequate)
- Good project. It was however a tough task for Matthias to try to help us all during the project hours. Perhaps another assistant would be a good idea.» (Adequate)
- By doing the project, the basic knowledge of MVDA can be obtained. More time might be needed to explore a bigger portion of MVDA theory» (Good)
- The project is a must since it helps me in understanding this subject. » (Good)
- fun project to learn more of what you can do with statistics.» (Good)
- I liked that you got to use a statistical software, and the project was good. Not to hard to understand which gave ypu more time on focusing on how the software worked.» (Good)

Study climate

24. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

49 svarande

Very poor»2 4%
Rather poor»8 19%
Rather good»23 54%
Very good»9 21%
I did not seek help»7

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Det är ofattbart att ha en räknekurs där det inte ges en enda räknestuga. Det fungar inte att ha rester på 15 minuter som enda tillfälle för 60 studenter att ställa frågor.» (Very poor)
- Man borde ha utsatt tid, typ "räknestuga" så man kan gå dit å räkna och få hjälp. Det fanns ingen tid på räkneövningarna för frågor. å sen när man gick och fråga jan var han antingen inte där eller så var han rätt otrevlig» (Very poor)
- There was no specific time for this, an idea, since Rodmar shouldn"t be teaching in english in full class, is to have him consultation where students can ask questions individually.» (Rather poor)
- would have like to have som kind of question time.» (Rather good)
- Jan Rodmar was really good at explaining things when you ask him in person.» (Very good)
- Rhodmar is great at answering questions and seems always eager to help» (Very good)
- Outside the computer exercises I did not seek help. During the Optimization project the opportunities were good and we didn"t have to wait for to long. During the MVDA-exercises, the waiting for help was tedious. It was to much for only one instructor. » (I did not seek help)

25. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

49 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 2%
Rather well»17 34%
Very well»31 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.61

26. How was the course workload (in comparison with credits) ?

49 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 4%
Adequate»32 65%
High»14 28%
Too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Since the projects didn"t give any credits for the exam or separate points.» (Low)
- Många uppgifter tar för mycket tid i vad man lär sig av uppgiften i fråga, om man nu väljer att göra alla. Annars bra med många uppgifter så att man kan räkna fler på dem man inte förstår.» (High)

27. How was the total workload this study period (compared to earlier periods)?

48 svarande

Very low»1 2%
Low»1 2%
Medium»24 50%
High»21 43%
Highest ever or close to.»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- The workload was okej this period, it is my own fault that I had a lot to do in the end, because I did not study from the beginning.» (Medium)
- Tre rapporter inom samma vecka plus returer ger en hög belastning och man kommer efter med räkning och annat.» (High)
- But I attended 3 courses so I have noone but myself to blame.» (High)
- To many projects!!!» (High)
- lots of hand-ins that made it hard to studdy fore the exams. » (High)
- my own fault though since i chose to study 22,5 credits» (High)

Summarizing questions

28. Level of material presented in the course was:

49 svarande

Too low»1 2%
Fair»0 0%
Reasonable»38 77%
High»9 18%
Too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

29. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

49 svarande

more»1 2%
reasonable»43 87%
fewer»5 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.08 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

30. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Opt-projektet»
- optimization project.»
- The optimizing project!»
- The optimization project»
- Everything.»
- The good lectures and good mood of Claes and Carl-Johan»
- All the reading materials, both optimization and MVDA projects. And most importantly, tutorials conducted by Jan Rodmar. »
- Claes as lecturer, the project.»
- Optimization project»
- The tutorials should be preserved but not neccessarily with the same supervisor. »
- The way the lectures were structured, the amount of information covered in the lectures, that MVA was not included in the final exam.»
- Optimization project. »
- project»
- opt project»
- The project and Claes Niklasson as a lecturer.»
- The book is really good. Solutions for more exercersises would be good.»
- optimization/experimental design project »
- Th Sober project»
- Project»
- the optimization project»
- The optimization project»
- The Pilot project.»
- Factoraials»
- the project and rhodmar»

31. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Sista delen i kursen, man hinne inte räkna dessa enorma matriser om man ska hinna med allt.»
- longer study period.at least two more weeks.»
- I think that it would be good to have some lessons to get help with the exercises because some exercises took very long time to figure out by your self.»
- More slots allocated for tutorials section»
- Nothing.»
- The excersizes! And also there could be a better solved-examples handout.»
- The examination and calculations are so boring. This exam I sat 4 hours and hit the calculator and 1 hour to lookup theory in the book - I dont think that measure my knowledge at all. The course should be about the ideas and theorys and not about be able to use plus and minus. Why not have a computer based exam? »
- It should remain the same since the course is well structured. »
- Maybe not so many tutorials, but lessons where you can work on your own and ask when needed. Jan Rodmar would be excellent at this, as he may not be the best person to speak loud, though he is great at explaining eye to eye.»
- MVDA project»
- I think you should change the tutorial supervisor. »
- The tutorials calculation could use someone who can speak louder. I really liked Jan Rodmar but he didn"t do well teaching such a large group. It was impossible to hear and therefore hard to follow his lectures. »
- - Lägg till en räknestuga i veckan. - Ha en övningslärare som känner sig bekväm med engelska. - Lägg till räkneuppgifter som håller samma nivå som tentan så att studenterna ges möjlighet att öva på svårare uppgifter. »
- It was often very difficult to understand what Jan Rodmar, who held the exercises, was saying since he spoke quite low and had trouble with the english language. I think I would have learned more if he spoke swedish. Maybe someone else could have the exercises with the exchange students.»
- more scheduled time to do exercises by you own, not just demonstration.»
- More instructors to the MVDA-exercises and something needs to be done about the tutorials/calculations. What"s the point of having tutorials if nobody understands the tutor?»
- Maybe it should be the same person who has the lectures that write the exam.»
- do not like the problematic learning It is waste of time to spend time trying to figure out something that you haven´,t been introduced to»
- Exercise teacher! You don"t understand anything of what he says! the lectures does"nt help anything then!»
- Jan Rodmar was very good as a instructor when you talk to him one-on-one, but unfortuantely this doesn"t translate into a big room filled with people. »
- the MVDA part. I don"t like small part of a course that don"t belong to the other. Better to have another course in MVDA!»
- I would thick about switching Rodmar and to have some more experienced persons as optimization project leaders. »
- Please replace Jan. Also it would be appreciated if the course would cover the use of common statistical software. This could easily be implemented in the optimization project and since everyone in the real world use them it would seem useful to have seen them before. Being able to calculate ANOVAs by hand really isnt that useful, instead we could use the time to learn how to interpret the results»
- En ny övningsledare»
- Jan Rodmar should not be doing the exercises Maybe he could have consultations in addition to someone else haveing the exercises?»
- Maybe change calculation lecturer if it is supposed to be held in english.»
- The examination must be MUCH better! I think the someone that attented everything, calculated all tasks in time and done all examination should have a chance to get a good result. But if the examination contains things that weren"t during the lectures or excercises, than anything that"s in the book can come on the examination. In this case you have to learn things DURING the examination, and it does not matter at all wether you"ve attended lectures or not. »
- More theory.»
- might be good to study 3^k»

32. What is your general impression of the course?

49 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 2%
Adequate»11 22%
Good»26 53%
Excellent»11 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- I think the course was really fun and I enjoyed it. I think that the lectures were good, the calculation excercises were good in order to solve the questions. BUT i"m a really disappointed with the examination, since it contained so many new moments. :)Nothing personal, it"s just that I expected to perform well! » (Fair)
- Need solutions would facilitate the course and increase how mutch you learn» (Adequate)
- some parts were really good but some parts are were really poor so the total sum is just adequate.» (Adequate)
- Mycket rolig kurs!» (Good)
- For the next time it would really be nice if just not SOME of the students got access to a full and good swedish compendia of solved examples. It reached me 5 days before the exam but apperantly some student got hold of it from a teacher already in the first weeks. This would have increased my study-efficience by really lot and is really not ok that it is handed out to a few students who have the guts to ask for it! Hand it out to everyone or noone, its not fair that some student should have an easier and better teachings than others.» (Good)
- Easy to see the applications thanks to the project.» (Good)
- It turned out to be a fun and interesting course, which I did not think it would be. » (Good)
- This course really lightened an interest in statistical engineering! Great job!» (Excellent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.63

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.63
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.54

Kursutvärderingssystem från