ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Experimental Physics, TIF060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-09-21 - 2011-11-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»4 50%
Around 30 hours/week»1 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I honestly have no idea.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»8 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»3 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Experimental course..» (Small extent)
- It would have been better if the course content had included lectures on the scientific method and related topics.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Was there any course litterature? The introductory text were very helpful, but there were none in the remote sensing lab.» (Small extent)
- There was no litterature...» (Small extent)
- No literature but some info on the homepage like lab-pm, some where good but for the Remote Sensing lab there was no info at all.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 25%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- There was a lot of confusion in the beginning about whether each group should turn in one PRL or 2 PRL style report.» (Rather badly)
- Quite a lot of outdated contact info for the supervisors, but otherwise no problems.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»5 62%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 50%
Very well»4 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 75%
High»1 12%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- The workload on this course was what you could"ve expected from a 7.5 point course. Unfortunately the high workload from Quantum Mechanics made it hard to find enough time for this one.» (Adequate)
- Good except for the Remote Sensing lab which had unreasonable much work after the lab in the form of Matlab coding and such. Seemed unecessary and didn"t learn much, got virtually no help either.» (Adequate)
- A lot of time was put on things that really weren"t too difficult, but just "had to be done", stuff we pretty much already knew how to do since the Exp. fys. courses. This could be reduced, maybe by less report writing.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 50%
High»4 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

14. What should be preserved to next year?

- Well, some labs where good. Good to write reports in english which you are unused to.»
- Most of it.»

15. What should be changed to next year?

- More feedback on the reports would be nice.»
- Remote sensing had no info on the homepage so you couldn"t prepare anything. The Matlab coding was timeconsuming and tedious, seemed like a waste of time. Equipment was old and broken sometimes, but I guess you could say that broken equipment is a part of experimental physics, it"s just funny that in all experimental physics course we have had to work with piece of shit equipment. It could be a nice change to do some experiments with equipment that does what it should do..»
- Make sure the web page is up to date at the start of the course. If possible instrument manuals could have been provided electronically before the lab sessions to help make the most of the time in the lab. Time was in general sufficient, though.»

16. Additional comments

- I guess the content on the course web page regarding how the PRL report and report in the normal format is to be split within a group must be changed. It was quite confusing.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från