Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Vehicle Dynamics, MMF062

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-16 - 2008-02-06
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Robert Thomson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 4%
Around 20 hours/week»4 18%
Around 25 hours/week»11 50%
Around 30 hours/week»6 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- actual that after a few weeks later i started spending some time to work on the course» (At most 15 hours/week)
- really depend on how much you want to learn from it» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 4%
75%»5 22%
100%»16 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»17 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- I liked that goals for each assignment were given. Made it easyer to know what to concetrate on.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»21 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 28%
Yes, definitely»15 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The exam was good since it enables to show our -understanding ouf the course -ability to solve mechanical problems» (Yes, definitely)
- It was a good exam» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 9%
Large extent»14 63%
Great extent»6 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- the teaching helped me to understand a few basic concepts but again there are few which were pretty fast and too a long time to get or still not yet confirmed why is that happening so» (Some extent)
- Very clear lectures, good elocution thank you!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 13%
Large extent»12 54%
Great extent»7 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- as far as the material is concerned it was fine but still i could some mistakes which were corrected in the class but no changes were made on them» (Large extent)
- Very helpful course litterature, thank you for offering this for free, other teachers should do the same!!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 50%
Very well»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 18%
Very good»17 77%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- It is not so good that everyone is at Lindholmen, they are hard to reach.» (Rather good)
- Since Rob is at Lindholmen it was hard to pay him a visit with questions» (Rather good)
- It is bad that the teachers are at Lindholmen and not at Chalmers Guldheden.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»10 45%
Very well»11 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- well the assignments and stimulation parts seems to have brought us together and start discussions to get the actual knowledge of the part.» (Rather well)
- We helped each other a lot when we where working on the assignements.» (Very well)
- Especially the assignments needed cooperation» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»12 54%
High»10 45%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- High compared to my previous study experiences, but made me learn much better.» (Adequate)
- but it was quite good» (High)
- I didn´,t have much time to study passive safety.» (High)
- depend on individual self-demanding » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»12 54%
High»6 27%
Too high»4 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- At times we felt it was high, but looking back and assessing it we feel it was quite good.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»10 45%
Excellent»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Do not have much to say, Robert is great, everything was interesting.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- teaching team »
- the assignments and simulation options»
- the assignments! And the teaching assistants. they are good.»
- the course material, but i suggest it is reviewed once again before it is shared with others.»
- The design tasks and the hand ins - learnt the most from them.»
- The assignments! They were really good for the understanding...»
- All»
- The teacher, the content»
- simulation part»
- Rob Thompson!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- some practicality or a field trip would help better»
- The notes which was given to students has some errors and it must be Lesser for next year»
- please make sure that concepts which you feel is really difficult in a students point of view been thought slowly»
- Donno... maybe try and hold mr typeO away from the important formulas :P»
- Nothing»
- All the errors, but I guess Robert has found and fixed them all now.»
- Perhaps some exercises to practice on and not just the Matlab tasks.»
- The reward system for the assignments. Its a mess.»
- simulation 2 should be given out earlier»
- To many assignments»

16. Additional comments

- the simulation assignments were not so clear. I could not actualy understand what do you expect from that. I think the questions should be more clear. also, the 1st and 2nd assignment were good, but the 3nd and 4th were so easy and it was no use of them to learn.»
- Teacher is open-minded and considerate! He and his teaching assistant did a great job for this course, we can feel the efforts they"ve paid! »
- Thanks»
- NIL»
- Overall the course was excellent. The classroom training and handouts given were excellent (few corrections in the handouts). The assignments were very good too, especially the simulation.»
- more hint how to deepen the study of simulation might be good»

Kursutvärderingssystem från