Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FKA190 evaluation

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-16 - 2008-06-16
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: August Yurgens»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»3 21%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»4 28%
At least 35 hours/week»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

2. How large part of the teaching/practizing offered did you attend?

(I.e. your supervisor was willing to guide you to the lab, give explanations etc. but you refused due to different reasons)

14 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 14%
100%»11 78%
Don"t know»0

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable were the course project goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 78%
No, the goals are set too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- we have some problem in the theory parts of our projects,But the fabrication course was sufficient for working in cleanroom.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. How would you change the grading system of the course?

(Think about difficulty in setting a common criteria for so much different projects. Also, different supervisors can have dissimilar expectations on the students" performance)

14 svarande

Two level system "Passed-Not passed" is sufficient»3 21%
I suggest my system, see below»2 14%
No change is needed»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I found this qualitative scoring so ambiguous and mostly with emotion rather than more specific attention to the student "s attempt» (I suggest my system, see below)
- The supervisor should not be allowed to judge because he knows the subject well and the presentations would look obviously superficial to him. A third person is the right one to judge like Prof.August. He is new to the presentation and can see it in a layman"s view.» (I suggest my system, see below)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the supervision been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»1 8%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 25%
Great extent»8 66%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- My supervisor is not so clear in his ideas.» (Large extent)

7. Were you assigned to a project that you liked and wanted from the beginning?

14 svarande

No»3 21%
Partly»2 14%
Yes»6 42%
Definitely yes, because I have found the project myself»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

8. How do you assess the project subject? It was

14 svarande

Boring»1 7%
Not interesting»0 0%
So-so»1 7%
Interesting»9 64%
Very interesting»3 21%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- I searched for interesting ones» (Interesting)
- It was interesting but since the supervisor did not have clear cut ideas, that affected us. because we are new to research work. Supervisor"s ideas were also contradictory.» (Interesting)

9. How much have you learned during the project?

14 svarande

Nothing»0 0%
Almost nothing»2 14%
So-so»2 14%
Much»5 35%
Very much»5 35%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- very much about fabrication process,atmosphere of working in cleanroom and also working as a memner of a group.But unfortunately we could not learn any thing about the theory of our project.» (Very much)

10. Has the project resulted in what was planned?

14 svarande

No»4 28%
Partly»6 42%
Yes»4 28%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

- Commpletely on contrary, I really tried hard, learned many things and did my best, but at last I found my score in the low 25% of students" score, so strange! that was not the thing that I expected» (No)

11. Has the project met your expectations?

14 svarande

No»4 28%
Partly»4 28%
Yes»6 42%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»5 35%
Very good»7 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»7 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

14. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»7 50%
High»3 21%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Dependent on the supervisor"s workload» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 15%
Good»5 38%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It can be made excellent still. But it depends on the supervisor to outline what is expected out of the project and give good guide lines.» (Adequate)
- This course helped us to learn about clean room which is ultimately gonna be our work place. So I would suggest that this kind of courses should be frequently offered instead just ones in an year. Due to lack of time and unavailability of my supervisor, I could not enjoy this course.» (Good)
- the course itself was excellent and very necessary but the evaluation was not fair.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- August Yourgin »
- The course should be preserved. its a nice one..»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A date for presentation should be set at the start of the course.»
- evaluation»
- There should be more projects»
- There should be two supervisors. this is very important because one supervisor has all ideas in his point of view. Different opinions are extremely important in research as we are new to research exposure. this will also allow us o give a true taste of research and carry out our own independent research!! »

18. Additional comments

- thanks for the chance of working in a nice group»
- We should have at least one meeting every week with the course in charge so that Prof.August can correct our errors and give suitable tips and guidelines. this is very important. Thank you Dr.August for this nice course!!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från