ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced Passive Safety Q4 2011, TME195

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-06-29 - 2011-10-15
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Johan Davidsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 100%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Course PM was distributed far too late! Goals could be made clearer, especially regarding the exam.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 50%
No, the goals are set too high»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Many subjects, most of them very superficial, a lot of slides were just scrolled through - but some detailed questions in the exam» (No, the goals are set too high)

4. Did the assignments and the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I expected more questions on anatomy in the exam. I think some of the questions were hard to understand and some required understanding and not only memorizing which it was said to be. » (To some extent)
- It was difficult to prepare for the exam, as it was largely unknown which areas and subjects were going to be examined.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Many of the slides/handouts I could just have read on my own. Some of the lectures were unorganized and the speakers did not seem to be well prepared. Also there was an overlap between the speakers, a lot of information were mentioned twice. Maybe it would be good if the invited lecturers have been informed about the topics in assignment 1 in advance and can focus more on these parts in there lectures. » (Some extent)

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Good that the book was available online!» (Large extent)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 50%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The handouts worked well but there was a lack of clear information on what was expected from the students in the course, like a course-pm, and it did not work very well with the papers that we should read before the lectures.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 25%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»1 25%
I did not seek help»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»2 50%
Too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Because of some misunderstanding or not clear enough information I think many students were surprised when we got the course-pm and found out that much more than just the anatomy part were included in the exam. This resultet in a too high workload in the end of the course. Also, Assignment 3 could have been handed out earlier. There were too many deadlines at the same time.» (High)
- Assignments were quite a lot of work, plus the exam which was difficult to prepare for - might be better to focus on one of the two options» (Too high)

10. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 100%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

Assignments

11. Did you learn a lot when carrying out assignment 1?

4 svarande

Did not learn very much»0 0%
Did not learn so much»1 25%
Learnt a fair bit»2 50%
Learnt a lot»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The visits to the industry should be earlier in the course. » (Learnt a lot)

12. Did you learn a lot when carrying out assignment 2?

4 svarande

Did not learn very much»1 25%
Did not learn so much»2 50%
Learnt a fair bit»1 25%
Learnt a lot»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

13. Did you learn a lot when carrying out assignment 3?

4 svarande

Did not learn very much»1 25%
Did not learn so much»1 25%
Learnt a fair bit»2 50%
Learnt a lot»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- It should be presented earlier in the course. It took a lot of time to learn LS-DYNA and so less time was focused on the biomechanical part of the assignment. Good that an extra opportunity to ask the teachers was scheduled!» (Learnt a fair bit)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 50%
Adequate»2 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Very interesting course (content), but lectures sometimes badly structured, main objectives in each lecture often not clear (summary at the end!)» (Fair)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Visits to the industry if it works and they are earlier in the course. »
- The idea of the assignments»
- Most of the content: materials, biomechanics, anatomy (to some extent!! cannot all be covered), special properties of road users (e.g. child safety). Karin"s lecture at the end was very good (practical application with vegetables and shoes).»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The course needs to be better organized and the information needs to be clearer. The idea with the papers was good but did not work. It would have been better to arrange the desks and sit like in a conference room and discuss instead of just listen to the lecturer. Since we were only a little more then 10 students I think it would have been more fun, easier to ask questions and discuss different topics if the form of the lectures was changed. »
- The goals of the assignments should be defined clearer. The timing of the third assignment should be better (earlier introduction!) Far too many slides to prepare for exam (flood of information)»
- Course preparation: Plan ahead, set clear goals, include a reasonable amount of content and cut out the rest. Base the exam questions strongly on the content of the lectures, so that students can prepare. Include more discussion sessions in the lectures (why were the papers sent out in the first place if they were mostly not a matter of discussion at all?)»

17. Should the assignments be a smaller or larger part of the course?

1 svarande

Yes!»0 0%
No!»0 0%
Same as this year!»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Depends if there is an exam as well. If yes, the assignments should be a much smaller part (maybe 50% of this year).» (?)

18. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från