ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modelling of Nuclear Reactors, TIF205

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-06-09 - 2015-01-07
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Christophe Demaziere»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»3 60%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- It was well worth the time!» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Again, well worth all the time!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?*

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Could perhaps have demanded slightly more knowledge of the theory.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- if the hometasks are regarded as part of the examination then "Yes, defintely", otherwise if just the oral exam is considered "To some extent".» (To some extent)
- Perhaps some more theoretical part? A project? Read some article each and present?» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?*

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Good teaching.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?*

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

8. Teaching methods*

Due to the complexity of the presented topics, the teaching was based on three course moments:
1- Lectures covering most of the course contents.
2- Home studies of the lecture notes, and writing of summaries of each chapter by the students themselves.
3- Home tasks where some of the presented methods have to be applied to practical cases.

How did these methods work for you?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Good interaction and combination of writing and slides» (Very well)

9. Expectations from the teaching staff*

Did you have a clear idea of where you were going and what was expected from you in this course?

5 svarande

No, definitely»0 0%
No, to some extent»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»1 20%
Yes, definitely»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?*

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. Summaries of the chapters*

The purpose of the summaries was to ask the students to extract the main points of each chapter, to make links between the different methods, and to favor a holistic and deep approach to learning. How did it work for you?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I thought it was difficult to extract the right information that was wanted from each chapter, especially which equation that were sought.» (Rather well)

12. Home tasks*

The main purpose of the home tasks was to ask the students to put what they have learned into application. How did it work for you?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 20%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Fun!» (Very well)

13. Assessment*

The assessments were based on hometasks, as well as on an oral exam/discussion primarily meant at checking whether the students had worked in an individual manner on the hometasks. Do you find this way of assessing the students appropriate?

If you have any suggestion about a better assessment, please enter some additional comments.

5 svarande

No, definitely»0 0%
No, to some extent»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Perhaps more theory on the oral exam?» (Yes, to some extent)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?*

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?*

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

16. How was the course workload?*

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

17. How was the total workload this study period?*

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?*

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 20%
Excellent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- hometasks, summaries, oral exam»
- The structure and setup of the course. The lecture notes were very thoroughly dealing with the different topics which is very good. »

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I found it rather difficult to grasp all of the ideas of the last chapter, it was a lot of different quantities. Maybe a home task on this part of the course would be good so that one gets a concrete example. »

21. Additional comments

- Interesting course, I have really learnt a lot. »

22. Recommendation*

Would you recommend this course to other students?

5 svarande

No, definitely»0 0%
No, to some extent»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från