|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Reality Studio 2011, Ark 161/181Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-06-08 - 2011-06-23 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52% Kontaktperson: Catarina Östlund» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goals1. Learning outcomes in relation to the role of profession1) Understand the professional work in a broader perspective and find new tasks on an international labour market.2) To broaden the understanding of the own perspective and its limitations, through meetings with other professional and cultural perspectives on sustainable development. 3) To further develop a critical thinking and reflections on the professional role, the professional ethics and the needs for life-long learning. 9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 2. Learning outcomes in relation to "Sustainable development"1) Describe and relate to the political vision of Sustainable Development.2) Provide evidence on the usefulness of design for sustainable development in different contexts. 3) To compare and assess different sources and statements concerning design for sustainable development. 4) To combine knowledge from different disciplines and sectors in proposals for actions and measures in design for sustainable development. 9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 3. Learning outcomes in relation to understanding and development of tools methods and analyse1) Be able to understand the complexity of everyday life in specific cultural and social environments.2) Be able to use system analytic methods and tools for the inventory and analysis of the built environment in different local situations and contexts. 3) Be able to analyse a local situation from macro to micro levels. 4) Be able to critically search for information and assess the quality of different sources of information. 5) To contain a participatory and trans-disciplinary approach in the design process. 9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 4. Learningoutcomes in relation to the design process especially the communicative and visual part of it.1) Be able to design and assess concrete proposals and solutions for local sustainable development.2) Be able to visualise and communicate different proposals for clients, stakeholders and experts in different stages of the design process. 3) Be able to motivate different proposals with reference to scientific, or experience-based, knowledge and value-based arguments. 4) To combine scientific and artistic approaches in the design process. 9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - I would have liked to learn more about this.» (Insufficient) 5. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 6. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Some times there were things expected to be done by us as students with very unclear or no guiding at all and in short time. » (Too wide scope in relation to credits) Education and course administration7. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.88 - The course has been lacking in information and it as often come very late.» (Very bad) 8. Did you find the reflection exercises, lead by Pål, relevant and interesting?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - I think the "value exercise" was strange, I do not see the point in it, I felt it split the group rather than glued it together. It also seemed to bring up competitaive sides among the members in the group, I would have like to have known what the point of doing that was.» (Very much) 9. Were the lectures and assignments in the period before the fieldstudy relevant? See schedule9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.22 - To read books were relevant, but could have been told to intrested students before christmas. The lunchscape task was actually not good for anything related to this course.» (Some of it) 10. Was the time for preparation before the fieldstudy enough?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.22 - Time for reading, other courses and other preparations where a bit short. Which affected the other courses.» (No) 11. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - Good preparation, but not comparable with the actual field study» (Rather little) 12. How did the organised activities during the fieldstudy work in terms of content and organisation? Visits to Maseno, tours, lectures and meetings.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.77 - most of the content was good but the planning was a bit poor. it would be good with a bit more information beforhand, even though that can change very fast.» (Rather good) 13. How did the tutoring during the fieldstudy work, in terms af access and process?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - Very different during the two periods of the field study. The first part was lacking in tutoring but the second part was better.» (Rather bad) 14. How did the tutoring after the fieldstudy work, in terms of time, access and process?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - Depending on who you try to find or get in contact with.» (Rather good) 15. How do you rate the final presentation in terms of relevance of the feed-back and the organisation?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Ofcourse intresting to hear, but would have been better with more guests in the audience to get more discussions and input. Since most students already knew much about each others project the new comments and thoughts were mainly from the critic.» (Rather bad) Work environment16. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.77 17. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - It has been interesting but also difficult to collaborate with students from different design areas. It is a struggle just to try and understand the other ways of working than what you are used to. You also find that you may have different goals with your project work. I have learned a lot about others and about myself which is nice.» (Rather good) 18. How were the conditions during the fieldstudy, in terms of sense of security, sense of community and privacy etc.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - not very much privacy» (Rather good) Concluding questions19. What is your overall opinion of the course?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.55 - The experience has been fantastic. Although some organisational problems could be improved in the course. » (Very good) 20. What should be preserved for next year?- Most visits and the good spirit among most people working with the course, both here and in Kenya.»- the common visits to different places» - The fantastic field trip, and the relevant study visits and contacts in Kisumu!» - Freedom to chose subject.» 21. What should be changed for next year?- The connection to Maseno. Work with the same group of students or atleast form some tasks and visits on their focus areas. »- The two courses design systems and reality studio should be separated! and the first course should be finished by the time leaving for Africa. There is also a need for more information and earlier. It takes a lot of energy from the project work when one needs to re-plan and when new assignments are added all the time!» - Maybe. different litterature before the field study. The reflecion assignment was not relevant. The course should be 30credits and the semester should not be shared by two courses. Improve the organisation, let the student know what is about to happen in advance! » - would be good to have more lectures before going» - Clearer info about schedule changes, and a schedule that conforms to the chalmers standard.» - less excursions while in Kenya and make the course 30 HP» - It would be interesting have more mixed groups more, now students of the same design field (engineers, architects, product designers) chose to work together to a great extent. More lectures in design and examples on design projects that have been successful» 22. Other comments- A wonderful experience and a lot of memories.»- Thank you for the Reality Studio 2011!» - the communication between teachers have to be better. Very difficult to understand what is comming, what should be done and who should have what. Shanged minds all the time makes it very confusing »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%