Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Turbulence modelling, MTF270

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-06-03 - 2011-09-11
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Lars Davidson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 27%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»1 9%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»1 9%
25%»2 18%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 27%
100%»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Didn"t attend any of the workshops (except for the mandatory one), and about half of the lectures.» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read them»1 9%
They are difficult to understand»0 0%
They give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 9%
They clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

4. Are the learning outcomes reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, they are set too low»1 9%
Yes, they seem reasonable»10 90%
No, they are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the learning outcomes?

11 svarande

No, not at all»2 18%
To some extent»3 27%
Yes, definitely»5 45%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- I did not attend lectures however when I had quest both the teacher and the Phd student helped out ! » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has Assignment 1 been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Little extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»9 81%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

8. To what extent has Assignment 2 been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Little extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

9. To what extent has Assignment 3 (ANSYS) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Little extent»2 18%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- For the course the Ansys part was small, however, for real life, this seems like one of the more applied.» (Little extent)
- Didn"t do it» (Little extent)
- It was a very good assignment. Too bad that the calculations crashed though.» (Some extent)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3

- didn"t attend the lectures so much, so most of what I"ve learnt, I"ve learnt from the book.» (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»8 72%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»1 9%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

14. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»3 27%
High»5 45%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Assignment 1 and 2 was too big. They were not hard to understand or to perform but too much time was spent on finding errors. It was very easy to make mistakes in matlab.» (Too high)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»6 54%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Formula student takes time. » (Too high)
- This was the final phase of formula student and thus it required all of my attention, sadly I couldn"t perform as good as I wanted in this course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
Good»3 27%
Excellent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It is a good course. However I thought it was quite hard to know which terms that was modeled in the different turbulence models.» (Adequate)
- I really like the content of the course, and I feel like this course, together with the project course have made me get a better feeling and understanding for how to use, and how the flow calculations are done.» (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All three assignments.»
- Assignment 3»
- Dont know»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Personally I"m a huge fan of how you teach, until someone asks a question. As soon as someone asks a question, you seem to loose your thread and talk about the same thing for about 15 minutes, which I believe has led to the need to extend the number of lessons and also, for me made the lectures some what annoying.»
- The ANSYS day should be developped to get even more experience from it. »
- I thought that the lectures needs more structure in order to make it more clear that which turbulence model that is modeled with the different terms. »
- Dont know»

19. Additional comments

- It felt like some of the teachings, especially in the early weeks were very repetitive from the "Turbulent Flow" course, something I"d consider is to add "Turbulent Flow" as a strict prerequisite to reading this course, thereby giving more time for new stuff, and less repetition for the great many students that read turbulent flow aswell.»
- I think that the course maybe should have a higher focus on when especially the RANS models gives a good result or not.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från