ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MMA160 2011, MMA160

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-06-01 - 2011-07-01
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 71%
Kontaktperson: Rickard Bensow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 70%
High»3 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 20%
Around 20 hours/week»2 20%
Around 25 hours/week»4 40%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 20%
75%»5 50%
100%»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 50%
Yes, definitely»5 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Examinationsformen gillade jag inte. Ett projekt över hela läsperioden är att föredra.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the lectures in viscous flow been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

8. To what extent has the assignments A1-A2 in viscous flow been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

9. To what extent has the assignments A3 in viscous flow been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

10. To what extent has the lectures in potential flow been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

11. To what extent has the assignment A4 in potential flow been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

12. To what extent has the lectures in optimisation been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

13. To what extent has the assignments A5-6 in optimisation been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 60%
Great extent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

14. To what extent has the two guest lectures been of help for your learning?

- Not much at all unfortunatly , but they where interesting anyway!»
- Good overall understanding and how The theory can be applied on reality»
- Not bad, but expectation was high.»
- Some extent»
- Some extent»
- not at all»
- Inte så mycket, de var dåligt förberedda»

15. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Total compandium for study would be nice, with some guidance of scientific literature.» (Some extent)

16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- När rapporteras betyget?» (Rather well)

Examination

17. What is your general opinion on the examination form with reports and seminars?

10 svarande

Not appropriate»0 0%
Ok»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Very good»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Although this form enabled us to learn well about the topics, it was too theoretical. I would prefer to have an assignment with more application involved.» (Ok)
- report writings, self assessment is good, but a I would prefer a multiple choice based short exam instead of seminar. » (Ok)
- Jag hade personligen föredragit att examinationen skulle ske i form av ett större projekt där alla assignments var delar av det stora projektet. Exempelvis att vi har ett befintligt skrov som vi ska optimisera med någon mjukvara med de olika assignment delarna.» (Ok)

18. Was the procedure for examination clear from the course content?

10 svarande

Not clear at all»0 0%
Acceptable»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Crystal clear»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

19. To what extent was the self-assessment helpful when writing the report?

10 svarande

Small extent»3 30%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»3 30%
Gread extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

20. To what extent has the peer-review been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»3 30%
Gread extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- it is good, but rather difficult to grade your fellow students» (Some extent)

21. To what extent has the seminar been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»2 20%
Gread extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Study climate

22. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 50%
Very good»4 40%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

23. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

24. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 70%
High»3 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Most of the workload came during the final two weeks. Equal distribution of workload would be great. The report assignment material may be given at the beginning of the semester. » (Adequate)
- it was very high workload in the end of the period» (Adequate)

25. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
High»6 60%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- I am taking two other courses as well.» (High)

Summarizing questions

26. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Love the course. It reflects the higher level (M.Sc.) style of study. You learn, you read, you do, you reflect, you write, you discuss, and you present. » (Excellent)

27. What should definitely be included when this course is merged with the resistance course?

Note: In next year"s syllabus MMA155 Resistance and propulsion will be split and the resistance part will be merged with this course and the propulsion part with machinery systems.

- Potential flow methods»
- Assignment 5 and 6 with propeller optimization assignment.»
- All three sections Potential flow, RANS, and Optimization should be included. For the lab, all 6 labs are important and should also be included. However, labs could be supervised 45 mins with the rest for homework. (the first 20 mins should be demonstration and assignment intro by a Ph.D student) For the exam, 50% should be from CFD seminar and CFD report which should be hold and due one week before the resistance(now MMA155) final exam. »
- the last assignments 3 to 6 is very good in combination with the resistance course»
- The assigments!»
- Projekt som löper över hela perioden»

28. What does not need to be brought over to the new merged course?

Note: In next year"s syllabus MMA155 Resistance and propulsion will be split and the resistance part will be merged with this course and the propulsion part with machinery systems.

- Dont know»
- note sure»
- May be guest lectures. Optimization guest lecture could be given at SSPA while doing towing tank test for resistance part(now MMA155).»
- grading of your fellow students»
- Focus on the lectures from the resestance course instead of using the lecture from the CFD-course.»

29. Additional comments

- There could have been more time for the reports in The end of The course»
- none»
- I would like to comment on lab sections. At the beginning of the semester, FLUENT and SHIPFLOW introductory sections should be added. In those sections, Pd.D. students would demonstrate how to use the software step by step on his/her computer. The display from his or her computer monitor should be projected on a screen, so that the students could follow the same steps from their computer stations. I also believe that the lab sections would be more efficient if Ph. D. students provide about 20 minutes introductory/demonstration to the assignments at the beginning of each lab section. By doing so, we could eliminate queue time for question since most of the problems and questions that we had in the labs are common. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från