ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Internal Combustion Engines, advanced course, 2011, MTF 225

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-12-14
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Petter Dahlander»

Course administration and information

1. Where the goals of the course clear after reading the course PM and the information on the course web page?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»0 0%
Good»8 80%
Very good»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

2. Did you find the course web page satisfactory?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 10%
Good»6 60%
Very good»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- Faster update would be favourable» (Good)

3. Was the course PM satisfactory?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»9 90%
Very good»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

Learning

4. Where the goals of the course fulfilled?

10 svarande

No»0 0%
Almost»3 30%
Yes»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

5. Do you consider that you had good pre-knowledge?

10 svarande

Not at all, I missed a lot»1 10%
Yes»5 50%
Yes, definitely»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- but not the inner workings for what causes what phenomena. » (Yes)
- I didn"t use GT-power before this course, but tutorials have helped me a lot to understand its mechanisms.» (Yes)

6. Which parts of the course were difficult/easy?

- Assignment 2 was "terrible", the rest was ok. Terrible as in too short time to understand what you are doing and too little of tutorials to work of if you don"t get the four-pot. »
- Difficult: CFD Easy: downsizing & turbocharging»
- optical measurements»
- To fulfill the requirements of the 2. assignment in this relatively short time»
- Simulations on GT-Power were sometimes hard due to the complexity of the engine we had. »
- Difficult: GT-Power parameters, like combustion model. How and what to change»

7. Is it clear what your knowledge from the course can be used for?

10 svarande

No»0 0%
Almost»2 20%
Yes»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

8. Did you find the course to be scheduled right in time in the global course plan?

10 svarande

Yes»9 90%
No, too early»1 10%
No, too late»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.1

9. Did you find the "suggested readings" uploaded to the web page helpful?

10 svarande

Yes»10 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- don"t remember if they were there at the beginning but it is good to read a page or two before lecture. » (Yes)
- Were not a "must" in my opinion» (Yes)

Lectures

10. What did you think about the lectures as a whole?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»3 30%
Good»5 50%
Very good»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Some slides were a bit poor and it is sometimes hard to understand all the slides some weeks after the lecture. A paper support with more details could be helpfull for student, especially ones who need more concentration to understand lectures in a foreign language.» (Ok)
- Some overlap among the lectures content.» (Good)
- Could have been more lectures and less computer lab times.» (Good)

11. How many lectures did you go to?

10 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»4 40%
80-100%»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- A lot of them were unteresting.» (80-100%)

12. If you did not go to the lectures, what was the reason?

- Working on other subjects.»
- Formula student testing»
- Illness»
- My self discipline and the printed handouts»

13. How did you like the lectures by Petter Dahlander?

(Engine modeling, Sprays, Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD))

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»0 0%
Good»6 60%
Very good»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

14. How did you like the lectures by Arjan Helmantel?

(Gas exchange/charge motion, Engine operating characteristics, Development trends CI engines)

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»4 40%
Good»3 30%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

15. How did you like the lectures by Monica Johansson?

(Alternative fuels)

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 20%
Ok»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

16. How did you like the lectures by Mats Andersson?

(Optical measurement methods)

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»6 60%
Good»1 10%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

17. How did you like the lectures by Sven Andersson?

(Diesel injection system and system overview)

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 10%
Good»3 30%
Very good»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

18. How did you like the lectures by Anders Karlsson?

(Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in industry)

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 22%
Good»6 66%
Very good»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

19. How did you like the lectures by Ingemar Denbratt?

(Supercharging & downsizing)

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 11%
Ok»4 44%
Good»0 0%
Very good»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Design task

20. What did you think about the design task as a whole?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 10%
Good»7 70%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- Good to learn how stuff works, but took just too much time for the second one. » (Ok)
- Very time consuming.» (Good)

21. How many GT-Power exercises did you go to?

10 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»3 30%
40-60%»1 10%
60-80%»0 0%
80-100%»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Tutorials are ok, but should be fault checked before course start. » (80-100%)

22. What did you think about the GT-Power software?

10 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»1 10%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»3 30%
80-100%»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Software is ok, but the computers are shit and slow! How is one supposed to iterate when a simulation takes hours?» (80-100%)
- It"s a good software, however it"s difficult to start without good Tutorials and examples.» (80-100%)

23. What did you think about Chen Huangs supervision?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»1 10%
Good»4 40%
Very good»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

24. What did you think about Lars Christian Riis Johansen"s supervision?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 20%
Ok»4 40%
Good»2 20%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Course Literature

25. What did you think about the Heywood book?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 20%
Ok»0 0%
Good»5 50%
Very good»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Not state of the art, only for basic understanding» (Poor)
- Lacks information about some vital parts as knock and what to do about it. » (Good)
- Very helpfull for the basics and good complement to the course. A book with more modern technologies or lectures to complete it could help. » (Good)

26. What did you think about the lecture handouts?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 11%
Ok»1 11%
Good»3 33%
Very good»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

Your work

27. How many hours per week did you spend for this course?

10 svarande

<15 h»0 0%
Ca 20 h»4 40%
Ca 25 h»4 40%
Ca 30 h»1 10%
> 35 h»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- This is an avarage over the all course period.» (Ca 20 h)
- At the end of the design task 2, we spent a lot of time in Chalmersin to finish it on time!» (Ca 25 h)

The exam.

28. Do you think that the exam reflected the course well?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 30%
Good»7 70%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- A bit too much reproduction of facts» (Ok)
- I think there is not enough questions. It sometimes happens we don"t know an answer and 5 points are directly lost. Moreover, 2 hours are enough to finish the exam. » (Good)

Summary

29. What did you think about the course as a whole?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»1 10%
Good»5 50%
Very good»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4

- If not for the workload of Ass2 it would be very good. » (Ok)
- Too much about sprays.Not so much about turbocharging.» (Good)
- Very interesting because I would like to work on engine development later. » (Good)

30. What parts of the course should be kept to next year?

- Assigment 1, if it is not moved too the introduction course. »
- The 2nd assignment with more time to work on it»
- The awesome assignment- I liked it very much. Engine performance with alot of freedom to design your engine»
- all»
- The assignments»
- Design task was interesting and we learnt a lot during this. Courses themes are also interesting but need more accuracy and to more complete.»

31. What should be changed for next year?

- More supervision for the second assignment. Info about how much time Ass2 on average takes. Have Ass2 in a way that a tutorial can be used as base for the project,»
- Try to do the GT-Power assignments more educational.»
- nothing, it was perfect. i can just suggest to improve the future trend of SI (downsizing and turbosizing), the optical measurements (it was not so clear).»
- Some labs using engine cells would be very interesting!»
- The type of task in GT-Power»

32. General comments

- Interesting course»
- I liked this course, one of the best that I followed in Chalmers.»
- Interesting course, nice teachers : thank you!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från