|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Lean Production 2011, TEK230Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-06-25 Antal svar: 31 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47% Kontaktperson: Christian Finnsgård» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your workload1. On average, how many hours per week have you spent on the course, both individual work as well as lectures, seminars etc.?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 5.45 - Most of the time was spent reading and understanding, which I personally feel is essential to the way the module is run. In order to do a seminar the literature had to be understood, or at least read to help start conversations.» (15 hours) 2. On average, how much of the total education have you participated in?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 9.7 - Unfortunately I missed one guest lecture...» (90%) 3. On average, how much time have you spent on each of the five seminars (time to be prepared for each seminar plus the time spent at the seminar)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 5.6 - Less than 2.0» (?) 4. On average, how much time have you spent on the group assignments, lean game and value stream mapping (don’,,t include the actual playing time and study visit time at the company)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.46 - Didn´,t go do the value stream mapping and the lean game didn´,t have any extra out side the actual game. Did extra work instead of the value stream mapping though.» (0 hours) Learning outcomes of the course5. How understandable are the learning outcomes of the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.09 - did not participate on the first lesson» (I haven’,t read the learning outcomes) 6. Did the examination (seminars and group assignments) test if you have achieved the learning outcomes?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - Seminars were extremely useful in creating new thoughts that I perhaps missed reading the literature» (Yes, to large extent) Education and course administration7. To which extent have the lectures contributed to your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - I found them a bit basic unfortunately» (To small extent (Grade 2)) 8. To which extent have the course literature and other course materials contributed to your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.29 - Well that"s the biggest source of learning (except discussion) in this course so I can"t grade it too low.» (To some extent (Grade 3)) 9. To which extent have the seminars and seminar tasks contributed to your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.64 - More than you think actually.» (To some extent (Grade 3)) 10. To which extent have the group assignments (lean game, case and value stream mapping) contributed to your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.74 - The value stream mapping was pointless for international students and those people who had to translate everything during the visit.» (To small extent (Grade 2)) 11. To which extent have the compulsory guest lecturers contributed to your learning?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.48 - Great mix of guest lectures.Inspiring. » (To large extent (Grade 4)) 12. How well did the course administration work (web page, hand outs, etc)?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - it was annoying with the constantly changing schedule» (Ok (Grade 3)) Working climate and working conditions13. How was the opportunity to get help and to ask questions to course responsible (Carl and Christian)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.63 - Did not ask many questions, but regarding deadlines and report outline connected to VSM the information was fuzzy and not thought through. It felt like the course responsibles did not have enough time and resources to commit to the course to a sufficient extent. » (Ok (Grade 3)) 14. How did you perceived the reception from the course responsible (Carl and Christian)31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.67 - They were not present at the first lecture but overall I think it eas a positive and nice attitude. The first meeting was at the lean game and that reception was ok. It was a bit unclear who had what responsibilities and if any of them had any area of specialization within lean and thereby was responsible for that. Too much open discusssions between the examinators that spread a feeling of unclarity and unstructured planning. » (Good (Grade 4)) 15. How was the working climate between you and the other students?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.64 - some seminars were very slow, and i feel every student should HAVE to answer a question. I don"t see the point in going to a seminar to just sit and listen.» (Good (Grade 4)) 16. How was the work load in this course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - it was continuous, it was a lot but it made you study right away and then in the end I didn´,t need to put tomuch work load on myself.» (Ok (Grade 3)) 17. How was the total work load this quarter?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - We do our Master Thesis this spring...» (High (Grade 4)) General questions18. What grade would you give the course as a whole?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.74 - It needs to be more structured and maybe it is best if just one person has the overall responsibility for the course, there was a confusion that spread out to the students probably because the responsibilities between the examinators were not fully desided upon. The VSM task must be improved (higher requirements on the report) or it should be removed. I would have preferred to learn even more about VSM though and therefore I recommend that the task should be restructured.
Maybe the number of seminars can be reduced so that more effort is put on just a few (maybe 4) and then it could be possible to receive better feedback from the work.» (Ok (Grade 3)) 19. Was it good to use seminars as a learning method and as a part of the examination?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.67 - Good to hear and discuss others thought etc. but for some people, who did not speak, I don"t believe it contributed at all. » (To some extent (Grade 3)) 20. Would you recommend the course in its present from to other students? If not please motivate.31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.9 - Lean as a subject I would really recommend, but I think I would give a warning that the course is a bit too unstructured when it comes to execution of the seminars and the choice of lectur content. There were not any consistency between the lectures. Sometimes content were repeated by different lecturers. That is of course good for learning but it was not perceived as it was intended to be in that way. There was not any line of argument throughout the course.» (Maybe) 21. Is this course appropriate in your master program?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.51 - Only with its own recommended courses it is not, but if the quality courses are chosen I would say that the course is higly appropriate.» (To some extent (Grade 3)) 22. I’,m studying the master program in:31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.32 - Product Development » (Other:) 23. Lectures: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- The guess lectures with real life examples were really Interesting. »- The lectures were really good and interesting,» - The basic concept on what is Lean and that we needed to reflect on it in many ways.» - Could be good to not put the Learning organizations and team work lecture on a friday afternoon since required full focus in order to grasp. » - Maybe even more guest lecturers. » - They were overall very good and interesting. Not too many which is good since the seminars take a lot of time» - Seminars and lean game have been very interesting. Value stream mapping should be prepared to a larger extend in advance.» - Most were good, but the lady holding the last lecture before easter break held a most exhaustingly boring presentation. I love the subjects that she talked about, but it was so horrible that I had to leave. She needs to review and update her pedagogic approach.» - good summary of key points» - The PowerPoints could use a design makeover. Since colour blindness is not that uncommon, you might want to change all those green and red bar charts...» - think it would be good to have more case studies than lecture theories alone» - sometimes covers what has already been said in previous lectures» - In general good lectures, and some very good guest lectures. The VSM-lecture was a little too much for only 2 hours of lecture. Maybe it would be beneficial to stretch it over 3 hours. » - it was interesting and the lecturers made it fun. would want the slides online more sooner.» - Review the lecture content and create a line of argument between the lectures.» 24. Seminars: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- Make sure that everyone participate. Some people were in silence the entire seminar.»- Too basic.» - It was good to get a comparison between Liker and the articles that had different focus. » - The seminars were great! I just think that the students who show up without saying anything during the whole seminar has to work extra somehow!» - The seminar about the hospital seemed to be more practical. Maybe it"s possible to include one more seminar, which is similar to this.» - The reading and reflection with a workload spread evenly during the course duration was excellent. I believe smaller groups enables more people to find the courage to actually hold discussions at the seminar. » - discussing about topics is very interesting, too bad that some people didn"t dare giving their opinions» - good» - require that everyone speaks at some point in all seminars» - Riktigt bra och lärande seminarier, men ett krav borde vara att alla ska delta i diskussionen och ge sina synpunkter/åsikter. En del satt ju tysta hela seminarierna, och ingen av er kommenterade det. Det tycker jag sänker motivationen att göra sitt bästa för oss andra.» - It would be nice to have them on wednesdays instead of mondays as many finds other things to do during the week, and save it for the weekend. It"s better to make time for it during the week instead to better divide the work between courses.» - Always a great atmosphere. The questions that the students had to prepare really helped creating interesting discussions. » - It takes a lot of time to do the work but it taught you a lot. Kind of "forced" you to learn the literature :)» - the results from some of the seminars were quite late, this fact might be improved if possible.» - The questions to be answered was good. For further notes, look at previous answers.» 25. Group assignments (lean game, case and VSM): What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- Maybe VSM more in deep detail.»- Better layout and more information» - They are all good but the seminars become more and more dependent on how well people read and write, not how leanish they are. I have trained very much on reading and breaking down articles this year, which made me only need to use less than one hour for each seminar. Some other struggled for a day. This doesnt seem quite right.» - Lean game and case were good. Prepare the students better for the VSM, it fellt quite bad to be at a actual company and barly have a clue as to what we were supposed to do» - More tutoring for the VSM.» - The VSM could be better prepared. If we had got a more meticulous review we had got more out of it. » - The VSM was not prepared enough... we didn"t get good directions at volvo and went to every single workplace. Somebody could have said before that it is sufficient to look at one place.» - The inability to comply reality to the instructions in the VSM mapping excersize was problematic but rewarding.» - maybe more instructions for the VSM» - The VSM shouldn"t be part of the examination if everyone can"t participate on equal terms.» - good» - very good visit, and in hindsight the lean game made a lot of sense, worked well at the beginning and a good way to meet people.» - The lean game was a good way of proving the validity of the lean concept and the case showing how it can be used outside production. Better information before the VSM visit at volvo would have been good.» - Lean game was great, the case very interesting. I have the feeling that the VSM especially regarding the company visit could have been prepared better, e.g. that the students exactly know what they have to look up at the production floor of the company visit in order to create a good VSM.» - the lean game was really good to show you how things work. Even though it wasn´,t real live it showed you how things work that we have been reading about.» - Brief info about the vsm activities could have been given in the bus before entering the factory. In the factory we didn"t have any time to plan or discuss before getting to the first station.» - The introduction to VSM was good, but it would be good with a introduction to the assignment of VSM as well.» - Previously answered.» 26. What should be changed concerning the course?- N/A»- Make it an advance course or tell people it is lean for dummies.» - I understand that correcting the asignments take time, but I wish that it would have been done faster. Waiting between 2-3 weeks is to much!» - Better preparation considering the VSM task. » - i think nothing except changes in lectures as suggested earlier» - Previously answered.» 27. Comments and other remarks- One of the best courses I"ve taken at Chalmers.»- A really interesting course that I hope to get use of in my career! Thanks to you and have a good summer!» - Carl & Christian... you guys are awesome! You managed to make the course really fun and interesting. Thank you! *hugs*» - Keep the seminar + nonmandatory exam system. Much much more rewarding than having a random sample with a percentage goal for fail/pass like common exams do.» - Overall I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I think it will be extremely useful when applying for jobs to have some sort of background in lean, and with this i can understand how every company is different in implementing this» - One of the best and definitely most interesting courses I had in my 2 Semester studies at Chalmers, so keep it on like that :)» - I may think the questions on the exams were a bit wide. I understand that wide questions are needed to see if the students underatnd the whole picture, but the ones where we ha to come up with the questions our self, I think that was a bit over the edge. It was really hard to know on what level to write and answer them.. Otherwise, maybe the best course I ever had. » - Very nice course!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%