ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS 2007/2008 - RRY035 Electromagnetic waves and spectroscopy, RRY035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-09 - 2008-01-31
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 85%
Kontaktperson: Rüdiger Haas»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 16%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»4 66%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- tougher and new to me...» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 16%
75%»2 33%
100%»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»4 66%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- only spectroscopy but not waves part...» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 40%
No, the goals are set too high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- this is applicable to waves part.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not the waves part, but the tutorial from Jan Weilan waves yes and challenging!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- But not the wave parts.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»2 33%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- Only spectroscopy and electromagnetics waves book.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»3 50%
Rather badly»2 33%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- only know it after the complaining been made.» (Very badly)

9. Electromagnetic waves part: How do you judge the course content?

5 svarande

Very interesting»1 20%
Interesting»0 0%
Reasonably interesting»0 0%
Rather boring»4 80%
Of no interest at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The materials are interesting but the teaching was quite badly arranged. Mitek gave an excellent teaching. » (Very interesting)

10. Electromagnetic waves part: Do you expect that the knowledge that you gained in this part will be useful for you?

5 svarande

I expect that it will be very useful»1 20%
I expect that it will be useful»0 0%
I expect that it will be partly useful»4 80%
I expect that it will not be useful at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

11. Spectroscopy part: How do you judge the course content?

6 svarande

Very interesting»1 16%
Interesting»1 16%
Reasonably interesting»3 50%
Rather boring»1 16%
Of no interest at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

12. Spectroscopy part: Do you expect that the knowledge that you gained in this part will be useful for you?

6 svarande

I expect that it will be very useful»1 16%
I expect that it will be useful»4 66%
I expect that it will be partly useful»1 16%
I expect that it will not be useful at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 16%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»3 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

15. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The course is way too broad. Especially in the electromagnetic part, too much material is intended to be covered. It is just something of this, something of that - which is very frustrating when trying to learn.» (High)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
High»2 33%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»2 33%
Fair»4 66%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- Too many different lecturers in electromagnetic part. They don"t know what the other lecturers already have talked about. Bad planning, no information, no course-PM.» (Poor)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Hmm... this is a hard one... the handouts in the spectroscopy part were quite useful.»
- Not the antenna.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A list of things has been sent to Rüdiger some months ago. The most important thing to fix is to improve planning and information, making the students able to plan for themselves. But the electromagnetic part is very strange. We have been told that it is this way because a lot of teachers in the spring semester wants us to know certain things. I say it is better that they learn us that in their courses instead of making a miscellany course about too many things. The number of lecturers should be decreased in the electromagnetic part. It would also be good to get back the corrected hand-ins in the spectroscopy part before the exam.»
- Electromagnetic part need some serious changes. Its goals should be defined what actually the aim of the learning is..»
- Separate into two courses.»
- There should be more cooperation between the two parts !»

20. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från