Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS 2007/2008 - RRY030 Astrophysics and earth science, RRY030

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-01-09 - 2008-01-28
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Rüdiger Haas»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 37%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»2 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 62%
100%»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 62%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»2 25%
To some extent»4 50%
Yes, definitely»1 12%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 75%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 75%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- but not Earth Science» (Large extent)

8. Earth science part: This part aimed simultaneoulsy at 1) giving an "overview" and 2) go "in-depth" on particular themes. How do you judge this mixture?*

8 svarande

well balanced and acceptable»2 25%
too much inclined towards "overview"»1 12%
too much inclined towards "in-depth"»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- Actually going in depth involves some more details and earth science background to really understand things..» (too much inclined towards "in-depth")

9. Earth science part: How do you judge the particular content of the "overview" themes?*

8 svarande

Not useful at all»1 12%
Partly useful»2 25%
Mostly useful»5 62%
Very useful»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

10. Earth science part: How do you judge the particular content of the "in-depth" themes?

8 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Partly useful»8 100%
Mostly useful»0 0%
Very useful»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»1 12%
Rather badly»4 50%
Rather well»1 12%
Very well»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- No course-PM, handout in astrophysics wasn"t corrected, we had one handout in astrophysics instead of three, reading list for astrophysics was asked for in week 1 and was handed out week 7.» (Very badly)
- "Very well ! just for the Earth part"» (Very well)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»3 37%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 12%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»5 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
High»2 25%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The workload was not a problem. The non-existent information was the problem.» (Adequate)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
High»2 28%
Too high»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- As before, the workload divided on the whole period was quite low, but as the information was so bad, planning was impossible. Thus most of the workload came in the end of the quarter.» (Adequate)
- felt like taking 4 courses.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»4 50%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»1 12%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think that the course litterature is good, though it is quite expensive.»
- All courses should be preserved.»
- The earth part was well organized.»
- Presentation of scientific article, homeworks»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Much of this has been written in a document sent to Rüdiger. Mainly the problem is bad planning and no information to the students. Personally, I also would like to see less transparencies and powerpoint. I learn much better when the teacher writes on the whiteboard.»
- For the earth science part it should be rather restricted to overview..»
- Separate them into 4 courses in 2 quarters. Good courses but we were in hurry last quarter.»
- The Astrophysics part should be more organized !»
- visual material: it is hard to follow when there is no visual guideline»

19. Additional comments

- The Earth Science teacher needs to be more specified in mathematics parts.»
- astrophysics: i enjoyed listening, but I think with more use of visual material it would sometimes be easier to follow»

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från