ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Gas Turbine Technology, MTF171

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-26 - 2011-09-26
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Tomas Grönstedt»

You own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»5 71%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
More than 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0-25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»0 0%
75-100%»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

3. Which master program do you follow

7 svarande

Sustainable Energy Systems»2 28%
Applied Mechanics»4 57%
Automotive Engineering»1 14%
Nuclear Engineering»0 0%
Other»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

Goals and fulfilment

4. How understandable are the course goals?

In the course description on the course portal you find:

The main goals for the course is that the student should be able to
carry out preliminary design and analysis of several different gas
turbine cycles (various stationary and aircraft engine cycles)
as well as to apply turbomachinery design principles to the
gas turbine engine.


6 svarande

The goals are not clear»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 3

5. Are the goald reasonble considering your background and the number of credits?

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- It"s a bit tough to apply turbomachinery design principles if you did"nt take that course..» (No, the goals are set too high)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»1 14%
To some extent»1 14%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I dont know, I have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Exam designed very bad. questions was not clear and very difficult, etc.. » (No, not at all)
- As I recall the exam was very demanding, making it quite difficult in some aspects to show that you had learnt the basics.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. How do you rate the efforts of the lecturers? What could be improved?

You may write separate comments for Kostas or me in the text box below.

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

8. How do you rate the efforts of the course assistant?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

9. How do you rate the course book?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 71%
Excellent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

10. How do you rate the design tasks?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Groups were too large» (Adequate)

11. How do you rate the written exam?

- Good except for the tubomachinery part. That was a bit hard. Also, the time on the exam could"ve been longer.»
- It was okay. A bit stressy though with a few too time consuming tasks. »
- Very demanding, requiring a lot of detail knowledge.»
- As I said it was a very bad designed exam. It tooks so much time to understand questions, et...»
- Good»

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts work?

- Fine»
- It worked well. Perhaps the theory questions for the exams could come out earlier. »
- good»
- Excellent»

Special events

13. How do you rate the efforts of the industrial lecturer (Martin Nilsson - Volvo Aero)?

The talk about CFD in industry...

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

14. How do you rate the aircraft aerodynamics lecture (Henrik Ekstrand)?

The pilot from Novair...

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

15. How do you rate the industrial lecture of Anders Lundbladh?

This was the lecture on Bio-fuels.

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»5 71%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. How do you rate the study visit at Rya-verken?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Fair»3 42%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

Study climate

17. How was the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- Kostas, Lars and Tomas were all nice, helpful and available.» (Excellent)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked in this course?

- It was good, though I would"ve preferred to be able to choose my coworkers for the design tasks.»
- Very good.»
- Good.»
- good»
- Adequate»

Summarizing quations

19. What is your overall impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

20. What should definitely be preserved to the next year?

- visit of aero-industiral turbin »
- The curriculum.»

21. What should definitely be changed to the next year?

- Turbomachinery prerequisite or less turbomachinery.»
- Decrease the size of the groups and let the students choose their own groups. »
- Group sizes on the design task»
- A little more work on the black board instead of presentations.»

22. Additional comments

- I would recommend the course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från