ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Semiconductor materials physics, FMI040, MPNAN, VT2011, FMI040, FMI040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-19 - 2011-05-31
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 33%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 33%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 66%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 33%
Yes, definitely»1 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 66%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 66%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 66%
Very good»1 33%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Course specific questions

13. Several teachers were responsible for the course presentations.

Was this a good mix?
What are your ideas for improvements?

- It was a good mix, but they should have their own slides prepared and know what have been touched upon earlier in the course. Less fragmentation. »
- It was good.»
- Yes it was good. More Lab sessions.»

14. Give your suggestion to the Miniprojects.

Are they good as presented or what kind of upgrading is needed?

- I think one should start with the projects early. They are good. Then you can have two projects in total. »
- They are good. But some groups have too many students and the presentation is too long.»
- Yes they were good»

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 66%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Actually, it is very organized.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Add one more project, early. Split problems A,B,C into home assignments that give extra points at the exam or grade them. Projects could also be graded but then an exam is probably superfluous. »
- It is ok without change anything.»

18. Additional comments

- I think this course is a materials course with some device focus and this is where it should have its focus. The physics part was negligible if one has had an introductory course in solid state physics, which was stated as an requirement/recommendation on the course homepage. Focus on what is done best in the course: materials and fabrication techniques. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från