ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Optoelectronics MCC055, MPMPE, VT2011, MCC055, MCC055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-19 - 2011-05-31
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»3 60%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- ?...» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- -tutorials: yes definitely good. -lectures: to much time. good, but I think the hours spent on this can be reduced. » (Large extent)
- the tutorial sections were too good the lecture were taught in a very organized manner. Teaching was excellent» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The book is great. All handouts are very good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It was very good that we had everything in advance.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- we were most welcome to ask questions and prof came up with answers immediately.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 20%
Excellent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

- It was very organized course. I got a clear picture of what was taught. Very nice course.» (Excellent)
- Many details in the course. Very well planned, executed by teachers. It would be very unfair to say that they did not perform on the highest level. The outcome depends more on the inserted effort of each student I think.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- tutorials »
- Tutorials, handouts. Most important. The book itself is very good. A lot of formulas though and direct practize, use of, is important then.»
- Home assignment. They force the start of studying and are very relevant for the exam.»
- Erik Haglund for the Exercise sessions –, one of the best I ever had! Very clear explanations and review of the topics from the lecture»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing its was great this year»
- Not much, but perhaps move workload from the end of the period to the beginning as much as possible.»
- I think the project could be rethinked/removed. It isn"t linked to the course very well and the requirement: 6 pages and 15(!) min presentation. The page number are ok but 15 min is high.»
- Project should rather begin in the middle of the course and not at the end, Printing the book on cheaper paper and cheaper quality to have a price around 200 Kr. It is a good book, but as a compendium of 200 pages much too expensive.»

16. Additional comments

- 1. Would it be possible to perform, report the project before Easter and not as now, the week just before the exam? Earlier deadline for the project-report as well as the presentation? 2. Would it be possible to place the labs earlier and less close to the exam? 3. Radical: Increase the speed of the lectures with a facor of two, 1h lecture, not 2h. This would save time for both teacher & students. The most important is to read the book, solve tutorials anyway. I think the the lectures takes to much time with respect to what they give. The book itself is so good, that lectures do not add so much value....(it does not mean the lectures are bad). A bad book demand more lectures, a good book reduce the importance of the lectures. Try to have more workload in the beginning of the course, and less to the end so time can be spent on rehersal, pracize, re-thinking etc. »
- Thank you to all the teachers. You did a good job and it helped me getting an extended overview»
- So far, Optoelectronics is the best organized course in MPMPE.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från