ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Antenna Engineering, SSY100, MPMPE, VT2011, SSY100, SSY100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-19 - 2011-05-31
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 13%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»7 46%
Around 30 hours/week»6 40%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- Much more time after easter (the last three study weeks) than the first four study weeks before easter.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Most of the workload of the course took part in the last 2 weeks of the course, where Home assignments and labs were taken at the same time as lectures. This did not let me any time to study the course» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 13%
100%»13 86%

Genomsnitt: 4.86

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 13%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 53%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The goals contain some more stuff than is actually included in the course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 64%
No, the goals are set too high»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»6 42%
Yes, definitely»3 21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The difficulty of the first part of the examination relied on your good memory. I would expect a master examination make students think and analize. With this kind of examination you are evaluating the memory of the student.» (To some extent)
- I liked the practical engineering approach(in particular the first part) of the exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»6 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- 2 Lecturers (Per-Simon Kildal and Jiang Yang)does not provide more information of what it is already in the book, just copy and paste the formulas and "explain" it. It is easier to follow the book than them. On the other hand, Jan Carlsson, Elena Pucci and Ashraf Uz Zaman gave good lectures: trying to explain the hardest and most important things about each topic.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The compendium still needs to be revised. For some section it is difficult to understand the text, specially in the last chapters.» (Some extent)
- I like the compendium, except "known" printing errors...» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 66%
Very well»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 26%
Very good»10 66%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»4 26%
Very well»10 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 26%
High»9 60%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- The workload was adequate but not well distributed over the term.» (Adequate)
- It was to much the last 3 weeks (labs and home assignments could have been started earlier).» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 40%
High»7 46%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- The workload has high because it was badly distributed during the quarter» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»2 13%
Fair»2 13%
Adequate»6 40%
Good»5 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- The content of the course is very good and interesting but not the lecturers. Some of them need to improve their teaching skills. First laboratory was poorly written. » (Poor)
- The content of the course is mostly based on the research of the group and their nomenclature and not on antennas in general» (Fair)
- The content of the course is fine, but in general the lectures where difficult to follow.» (Adequate)
- After all, it feels like the course wraps up into a unity in the end, where the more theoretical parts are used for practical antennas.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The tutorials teachers»
- I think, the course should be divided into two courses, and this one is the advanced one. Teachers knows everything and think that the student should know all of them in two months!! it is impossible to reach to that high level which they want! It is better to specify the important parts of the book for themselves first and teach only that parts. if student feels that she/he want to continue in one field can read more and more about that. for example not all the sketch in the book is interesting for someone who doesn"t have any knowledge about even the first part of the book! also the book is very goood but it is written in high level. after these two months now i feel better to the book but it is really difficult to understand some parts! it is not good book for learning! maybe it is good as a reference for professional in this field.»
- The software is very useful.»
- Elenas tutorials.»
- The laboratories exercises. More of them»
- Home assignments and labs were really helpful to gain understanding of the subject!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The course load»
- It is better to arrange a visit to the company»
- The workload distribution for the home assignments and labs.»
- Some Home assignments could be solved before Easter. Also some labs could have been done earlier. There should be better distribution of the workload along the period and not everything in the last 3 weeks!»
- The way they give the lectures. Lectures are boring.»
- Try to spread things so that not everything happens the last three weeks...»

16. Additional comments

- Thanks a lot for all your supports and help. The group work well to manage the course. It is well organized.»
- The content and number of problems in the exam is to large.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från