ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Environmental risk assessment in engineering, MPEMA, Vt11, BOM060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-27 - 2011-06-22
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51%
Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 3 15%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 40%

Around 25 hours/week» 8 40%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Hard to say» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%» 1 5%

25%» 2 10%

50%» 3 15%

75%» 7 35%

100%» 7 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Sure I missed out some great lectures.» (25%)
- I took the previous course in Risk engineering so half of the course were exactly the same...» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 10%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 5%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 9 45%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 8 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Introductions, Chapters 7 and maybe 10 worth to be read in the course book in priority. The rest I don"t know.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 19 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

19 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 9 47%

Yes, definitely» 10 52%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- couple of questions were too general...it creates confusion rather than guidance» (To some extent)
- The english was hard to understand. I had to read the questions several times before I understood what you where asking for.» (To some extent)
- Some questions overlapped and was hard to understand.» (To some extent)
- Some tricky questions!» (To some extent)
- It"s personal but I think there was an error in the exam. 99 percentile can be higher than the maximum value?» (To some extent)
- I think that the project work and the exam should be more connected. These felt like two different things but in the previous course the project work and the exam was more connected. I prefere that because it encourage memorisation.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 2 10%

Some extent» 6 30%

Large extent» 11 55%

Great extent» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- Better to listen and look on the notes instead of reading the book. I read the first 7 chapters but everything worth to mention was already on the powerpoint-slides.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the project assignment been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 1 5%

Some extent» 1 5%

Large extent» 13 65%

Great extent» 5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- The project assignment was not clear enough. Many things were unknown or unclear, and it was hard to have answers. Moreover, I think one course about the use of SADA is clearly not enough!» (Small extent)
- The project work was good, but I would have liked more support in computer rooms.» (Large extent)

8. What is your general impression of the project assignment?

20 svarande

Very poor» 1 5%

Rather poor» 2 10%

Rather good» 12 60%

Very good» 5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- it seems farely interesting but it would have been nice to be able to select different endpoints to actually see what the differences between the group could be. also a group might want to proofe no remidiatio is needed and develop a model that would support such hypotesis» (Rather good)
- Projects are a great way of learning, but it was a little unclear what we were supposed to do during the project, eg. with wrong information in the project work description and poor information when the misstakes were found. » (Rather good)
- Poorly constructed project PM. Repeating, and a bit confusing.» (Rather good)
- It was okey, more time for support especially in the computer rooms would have been nice. More connection to the exam, now it felt like it was to separate things.» (Rather good)

9. To what extent has the field trip been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 7 35%

Some extent» 6 30%

Large extent» 4 20%

Great extent» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- But was nice!» (Small extent)
- It gave a more practical view of the remediation problem.» (Large extent)
- Fun to see something in real! You should be clearer next year that everyone should bring food and so on... This time I asked you the lesson before otherwise noone should have been aware of this...» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 3 15%

Some extent» 10 50%

Large extent» 7 35%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Bought it but did not have the time to read it...» (Small extent)
- I really tried to read the book, I read the first 7 chapters but I couldn"t find anything woth to put effort in to know except material already on our PP-slides. The book was interesting but I hadn"t time to read it since the period was quite time pressured. when I really needed to read abt something the book didn"t described it so good. It had a poor register so it is hard to find what you are searching for. Not worth 500 SEK... you shouldn"t say that it the book is required to buy.» (Some extent)
- The litrature on the homepage was useful but i didn"t use the book.» (Large extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 3 15%

Rather well» 10 50%

Very well» 7 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- in my opinion as an exchange student i find it more helpful if the lectures are placed on web 2 or 3 days in advance. it is better to read something, develop idea, get concepts explaind in lecture and if questions are anaswered they can be asked in class. i think is a little more proactive approach of learning.» (Rather badly)
- Poor information regarding the project work, the presentations and practicalities of the exam.» (Rather badly)
- Very bad to change presentation groups without warning and making the group bigger. Smaller presentation groups would yield better discussion!» (Rather well)
- Some hard to get material before the lectures... especially from Sverker. It is really worth to have it before, otherwise you have to write much more and don"t have time to listen on interesting things!» (Rather well)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 3 15%

Rather good» 7 35%

Very good» 9 45%

I did not seek help» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Especially for the project work. » (Rather poor)
- but untimely...(from q11)» (Rather good)
- Some of the consultation times was without teathers to ask questions to. Also, the distribution of consultation times were not so good, eg friday afternoon and monday morning -> no time to do anything in between. Would also like more consultation in the begining of the project work.» (Rather good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly» 1 5%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 7 35%

Very well» 12 60%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 5%

Adequate» 10 50%

High» 9 45%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- There"s a lot literature to read in order to do the project » (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 8 40%

High» 10 50%

Too high» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- But rather unequally distributed, since we had big projects in both courses. Heavy load in the end of the study period.» (High)
- I took 3 courses + the Englis course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 4 20%

Adequate» 6 30%

Good» 9 45%

Excellent» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- very personal view but some "real" aspects are lucking in my opinion. yeah we should all be ethical when dealing with environmental issues but truth is the final call is based on the money to be spent...relatinfg the two and how to find the best alternative for the assesment is something that is overlooked in the course.» (Fair)
- I had higher expectations on this course.» (Adequate)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- project work»
- The project assignment where we could apply theoretical knowledge on a "real" case. »
- Study visit»
- groupwork»
- CBA and statistics should have more training !!!»
- The project work and the study trip»
- Field-trip, project.»
- The project assignment, and the literature Also the exercises sessions (for event and logic trees and Bayesian network, and for the statistical part) The field trip»
- the project work»
- The project is quite good for understanding the process of risk assessment.»
- Explanations of the different software»
- I really liked the lesson we had with Petra Brinkhoff, more of that!! That"s how you learn things!»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- statistics part. not good teaching i think.»
- More could have been said during the lectures. More ecological assessments. Less repetition!»
- General statistics came on course too late !»
- Better information to students and organisation between teathers.»
- Better administration.»
- Some lectures were not very relevant, quite boring. Maybe prepare a bit more the field trip. 45 min lecture explaining what we"re going to do, to prepare the trip and ask relevant questions during it.»
- At the begining of the project we are puzzled about what to do. It was clear after we seeked help from supervisors. So maybe the project introduction could be more detailed next year. »
- Add some Explanations of the different software»
- It has really felt like the course have been divided into two sections, one Sverker and Rickard and Lars and Andreas. I feel like information have been missed, one of the parts thought that the other part had informed us and so forth. Just see the presentations, if a shedule is setup it should be followed but you hadn"t talked to each other so we needed to stay for another hour or more.»

19. Additional comments

- Good course»
- thank you for the experiance...overall enjoyed the course»
- The course seemed poorly organized between all the different teathers and the information to the student need to be improved. We don"t want wrong information. That is a waste of our time.»
- Very good impression overall, the course was useful»
- Thanks a lot»
- Sorry for criticize the course but I like this subject and had higher expectations. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från