Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Multimedia and video communications, SSY150, VT11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-09 - 2011-05-15
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 50%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 11%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 16%
50%»1 5%
75%»9 50%
100%»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- Bad structure in lectures. The lecturer is very friendly but speaks in a low voice and can"t estimate how long a lecture should be (the material isn"t filling a whole lecture, therefore we always stop early). » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»11 61%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»4 23%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 76%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.76

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 35%
Yes, definitely»4 23%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»4 22%
Some extent»9 50%
Large extent»4 22%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»5 27%
Some extent»7 38%
Large extent»5 27%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»13 72%
Very well»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»2 11%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»9 50%
Very good»4 22%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»8 44%
Very well»7 38%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 22%
Adequate»13 72%
High»1 5%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»12 66%
High»4 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»2 11%
Fair»3 16%
Adequate»7 38%
Good»6 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- A lot of importance has been given to the computer network part, in my opinion more importance should have been given to speech, image and video compressions» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs»
- The labs statements»
- Guest lecturer Per Fröjd»
- labs»
- The group work, because it is very good and help you "learn" how is to work with different people from different countries-cultures etc..»
- no comment...»
- Labs»
- Projects, very good projects»
- guest lectures and lab»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- teacher»
- Groups should be randomly selected and very quickly (1.5 weeks max to know the groupmate).»
- The course evaluation questionnaire, it is too general. It asks Nothing about the labs (which are a huge part of the course, every lab should have its own evaluation questions), nothing about guest lectures, and nothing about the lectures (except how many percent of them you attended)...»
- 1 more lab»
- Almost nothing, maybe it is better if we can have an another presentation or instead of the Seminar II, we have a presentation of the final project so that we can have real feedback before we go to the Final presentation»
- teacher»
- Labs should be Individual »
- Not so much of Network protocols please, we will anyway forget them»

16. Additional comments

- The lab PMs should be written more clearly. I would like to get feedback much sooner regarding the labs we"ve handed in. As it is now, you"ll have to make all labs before you get to know the number of score you obtained on the labs. Since you don"t know how good or bad your first lab was, you can"t take that in consideration when you"re doing the next lab etc etc... which is rather poor! »
- Overall the course schedule was great, the professor was clear about what he wanted from us. I found that this kind of courses that they have a project instead of labs are better, because they help you improve your presentation skills and also your cooperation skills.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från