ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

eHealth, SSY115, VT11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-09 - 2011-05-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 25%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»3 37%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 37%
100%»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

- just missed 2 sessions . Its just less then 100% not perfectly.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 12%
Yes, definitely»2 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»6 75%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 12%
Very good»7 87%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»4 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 87%
High»1 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 62%
High»3 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»2 25%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Total refocusing of the course is needed. Today it is almost like one long PP-presentation with repetition of information. The level of this course is not "advanced".» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Every thing was really good.so we can continue the way we have found this time.»
- The variety of lecturers with different areas.»
- no»
- Some of the guest lectures. »
- -»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- In the quiz part,I think fractional mark can be introduced.In some quistions, It gives nothing though 90% of the answere was right.»
- Make sure that the same material is not repeated so often from the guest lectures.»
- The course gave me just a very basis knowledge about ehealth but I did not really understand the goal of the course. ex. if I am going to do my thesis in this area with our background (mostly electrical engineer and physics) I should start from the first in IT or in management system. So I think the course should more focus in t.ex. 3 or 4 field instead of that many areas.»
- no»
- Have some lectures in between that connects all the guest lectures and puts everything in the right context.»
- Introduce practical IT into the course, like databases, programming, webdesign or HCI, anything! Present this material from an ehealth perspective. As it is today, much of the course material seems pointless or easily accessed if needed in the future.»
- 1. The guest lecturer should be selected in a more appropriate way, giving lecture about some interesting issues in eHealth field 2. The assignments subjects are better to be changed 3. The quiz correct answers were Leif"s ideas in some cases, not what were actually were in the related lecture. It"s better to design quiz questions in a more appropriate way»

16. Additional comments

- Maybe a pre-course and/or post-course could help this mandatory course to be more efficient.»
- i think its a wounderful course, i enjoyed very much.»
- It"s hard to make the course consistent with so many guest lectures, a lot of them has been redundant.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från