Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Physics beyond the SM, FUF080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-05 - 2011-07-01
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»4 80%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 60%
100%»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Wish i had taken qft before, maybe that should be adviced on the course plan.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»4 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Gabriele is inspiring!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The links i looked at had good content.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- not so many students seemed to actually take the course for real so there were not so many people to collaborate with on homeworks etc.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»4 80%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I think the course workload could have been higher if the String course wasnt so heavy. Perhaps another 2 sets of homeworks for some guidance to what is fun playing around with (i.e. have some physical significance).» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Due to the String course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 20%
Excellent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

- Would have been better if i had taken qft before, but i have learnt A LOT, so thats a plus!» (Good)
- One of the best courses I have ever taken» (Excellent)
- Very good course, very intersesting and very understandable.» (Excellent)

14. What should be preserved to next year?

- Lectures in group theory Careful derivation of the standard model»
- Gabriele! Best lecturer I have ever had. He should teach more courses in the masters program.»
- Homeworks, oral exam, project was fun.»

15. What should be changed to next year?

- The name perhaps since the focus isnt really Beyond the SM. Maybe the title "SM and beyond" is better. (I think it is good that the focus is to understand SM, otherwise no point in going Beyond). Another course needed maybe for Beyond? GUT, MSSM,SUSY breaking, more on SUSY in general etc. Then maybe this course could be entirely about SM. »
- Everyone should have qft knowledge»

16. Additional comments

- The list of questions really helped when studying for the exam. Even if this form of the oral with given questions is not kept I think it is helpfull to have questions like that and call them study questions (instuderingsfrågor) or something.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från