|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Organizational Behavior course TEK030, TEK030Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-05-11 - 2011-05-20 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62% Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»
1. What is your general impression of the course?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.45 - Appreciate the experimental learning» (Good) 2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Did not use PingPong as intended.» (Rather badly) 3. How do you perceive the workload of this course in relation to the credits offered (7.5 hp)?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - The only problem is that the schedule clashes with other courses which is rather bad. The intensive mode in addition makes other courses suffer, but I understand that this is a good way for running the course.» (Adequate/fair) 4. How was the study climate during the classes?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - had some in my group that were quite pessimistic but i liked it» (Rather good) 5. Was the information regarding learning outcomes for this course clear?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - The work-shop format was excellent. Only in the BEST-network (an NGO) I have attended trainings with better pedagogic skills, but obvisouly not with this theoretical depth» (Great extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - Its a really heavy book to read. not somethings you just sit down and read.» (Some extent) 8. To what extent do you think your learning during this course is valuable for your future working life?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - I hope the team term paper will provide with some reflection upon how to apply the theroy and concepts. The experiemental learning is great, but I dont feel I master being a reflective practitioner yet. » (Large) 9. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The different group assignments, LEGO, survivial exercise, donny, »- working in tems to be able to conect the litterature to it at once.» - More concrete examples from what you learn ppl in real life» - The Morgan presentation» - Teachers, the room, the obligation to participate 100%, the interactive learning.» - Staying in one group through the entire course, and always having discussions in it» - Team assignments» - Everything :)» - Work-shop format, » - The teachers» - The interactive nature of the course. » - Team building,Lego case, » - All the small excercises. The way to build a team identity quickly.» - Tower competition» - politics, perception, lego-competition» - The mix between lectures and assignments/groupworks, which was very helpful in the learningprocess.» 10. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The lectures a really long, but that could not be changed that easy, I still think the layout of the lectures with workshops. »- Time» - Block schedule! I have been missing almost al lectures in the other course. The reason for block schedule are obvious and it is essential to be able to have electable courses. Pleeeees adapt yourself to the chalmers policy in this matter!» - Flemming sometimes has to get to the end faster! but i really like him and his views! they are really good!» - The long days» - More recognition/cred to all groups. That inspire/motivate a lot for even more improvment! Obligation to have social interactions and feedback sessions/after reviews.» - Less emphasis on tasks outside the classroom» - reduce the required amount of time pent on the subjects. Less mandatory session.» - Maybe some more real-life examples in the "mini-lectures", rather than the rather theoretical passages that was presented. The book provides with enough theory anyway! At least to me it doesnt need clarification, only practice in which it can be anchored» - The days are a bit too long. I would prefer to have more classes and shorter days.» - The group tasks during class could be more challenging in order to push us further. Could bring out further learning experiences. » - Nothing» - Regular breaks. » - I have been thinking about the examination. The course feels more like a pass/fail course, feels difficult with the grades. However, I haven´,t got my grade yet so I can´,t say if I´,m happy or not. I felt that the multiple choice test was a bit strange as I think I would have got a better result if I had studied less and been thinking less around the concepts. Don´,t really see the point of testing if we remember sentences word by word from the book... I have read every single chapter but still didn´,t liked that test...» - too long days which makes it hard to keep concentrated. » 11. Additional comments?- Good lecturers»- Best course ever!» - Thanks for organizing a course generating more respected leaders/managers entering the business market. As a bonus this course also gives a lot of value to me as a person outside school/work.» - The input of time (mandatory presence) in relation to the output of novel knowledge is far too high. » - the days are quit long. to keep up the concentration are not always that easy.» - Thank you for the best course I have taken here at Chalmers!» - Great course!» - Overall a very good course! But I am a bit sceptic to the grades in a course like this.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%