Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Organizational Behavior course TEK030, TEK030

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-11 - 2011-05-20
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

1. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»10 45%
Excellent»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- Appreciate the experimental learning» (Good)
- Interactiv learning! Perfect learning style for me and much more fun!» (Excellent)

2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»9 40%
Very well»12 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Did not use PingPong as intended.» (Rather badly)

3. How do you perceive the workload of this course in relation to the credits offered (7.5 hp)?

22 svarande

Very light»0 0%
Rather light»0 0%
Adequate/fair»17 77%
Rather heavy»5 22%
Very heavy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- The only problem is that the schedule clashes with other courses which is rather bad. The intensive mode in addition makes other courses suffer, but I understand that this is a good way for running the course.» (Adequate/fair)

4. How was the study climate during the classes?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»10 45%
Very good»12 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- had some in my group that were quite pessimistic but i liked it» (Rather good)
- Depending on what team you were in, the study climate was different. I was not very happy with my team which was very chatty, and therefore the study climate was not optimal for me, but his was due to the team.» (Rather good)

5. Was the information regarding learning outcomes for this course clear?

22 svarande

Very unclear»0 0%
Rather unclear»2 9%
Rather clear»6 27%
Very clear»14 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 4%
Large extent»9 40%
Great extent»12 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The work-shop format was excellent. Only in the BEST-network (an NGO) I have attended trainings with better pedagogic skills, but obvisouly not with this theoretical depth» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 36%
Large extent»9 40%
Great extent»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- Its a really heavy book to read. not somethings you just sit down and read.» (Some extent)
- the book is too long in one sense, I get bored when reading it. However, there is a lot of good facts in it.» (Some extent)
- The book is a bit to American and extensive but probably the best one anyway. » (Large extent)
- The course litterature would have been a bit unclear at times without the teachers clarifying it during the lectures.» (Large extent)
- I havent read Morgan so much, but the other book is very good!» (Great extent)

8. To what extent do you think your learning during this course is valuable for your future working life?

22 svarande

Small»1 4%
Some»1 4%
Large»9 40%
Great»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- I hope the team term paper will provide with some reflection upon how to apply the theroy and concepts. The experiemental learning is great, but I dont feel I master being a reflective practitioner yet. » (Large)
- I learnt so much about myself in a group and how to influence others!» (Great)
- I have a wish to become a good leader, and no i gained much more valuable hands-on experience!» (Great)
- A lot of good ideas and concepts that I will bring with me from the course!» (Great)
- I take with me many learnings about myself, how I work and function in a team, but also how others can act in, and be affected by, a team.» (Great)

9. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The different group assignments, LEGO, survivial exercise, donny, »
- working in tems to be able to conect the litterature to it at once.»
- More concrete examples from what you learn ppl in real life»
- The Morgan presentation»
- Teachers, the room, the obligation to participate 100%, the interactive learning.»
- Staying in one group through the entire course, and always having discussions in it»
- Team assignments»
- Everything :)»
- Work-shop format, »
- The teachers»
- The interactive nature of the course. »
- Team building,Lego case, »
- All the small excercises. The way to build a team identity quickly.»
- Tower competition»
- politics, perception, lego-competition»
- The mix between lectures and assignments/groupworks, which was very helpful in the learningprocess.»

10. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures a really long, but that could not be changed that easy, I still think the layout of the lectures with workshops. »
- Time»
- Block schedule! I have been missing almost al lectures in the other course. The reason for block schedule are obvious and it is essential to be able to have electable courses. Pleeeees adapt yourself to the chalmers policy in this matter!»
- Flemming sometimes has to get to the end faster! but i really like him and his views! they are really good!»
- The long days»
- More recognition/cred to all groups. That inspire/motivate a lot for even more improvment! Obligation to have social interactions and feedback sessions/after reviews.»
- Less emphasis on tasks outside the classroom»
- reduce the required amount of time pent on the subjects. Less mandatory session.»
- Maybe some more real-life examples in the "mini-lectures", rather than the rather theoretical passages that was presented. The book provides with enough theory anyway! At least to me it doesnt need clarification, only practice in which it can be anchored»
- The days are a bit too long. I would prefer to have more classes and shorter days.»
- The group tasks during class could be more challenging in order to push us further. Could bring out further learning experiences. »
- Nothing»
- Regular breaks. »
- I have been thinking about the examination. The course feels more like a pass/fail course, feels difficult with the grades. However, I haven´,t got my grade yet so I can´,t say if I´,m happy or not. I felt that the multiple choice test was a bit strange as I think I would have got a better result if I had studied less and been thinking less around the concepts. Don´,t really see the point of testing if we remember sentences word by word from the book... I have read every single chapter but still didn´,t liked that test...»
- too long days which makes it hard to keep concentrated. »

11. Additional comments?

- Good lecturers»
- Best course ever!»
- Thanks for organizing a course generating more respected leaders/managers entering the business market. As a bonus this course also gives a lot of value to me as a person outside school/work.»
- The input of time (mandatory presence) in relation to the output of novel knowledge is far too high. »
- the days are quit long. to keep up the concentration are not always that easy.»
- Thank you for the best course I have taken here at Chalmers!»
- Great course!»
- Overall a very good course! But I am a bit sceptic to the grades in a course like this.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från