|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Ethics and Intellectual Property, FTEK040Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-04-26 - 2011-05-06 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29% Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.1. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 Study climate2. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - In connection to the lectures rather good, otherwise I did not seek any help.» (Rather good) 3. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Individual assignments --> litte cooperation among the students.» (Rather poorly) 4. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - The workload was shifted too much towards the end of the course. Nothing to du the first weeks and then a lot at the end of the, a bit unfortunate.» (Adequate) Part I: General Questions5. What is your overall impression of the course? Please motivate your answer!- A nice course with interesting discussions and good lectures and guest lectures. »- It is good to learn about intellectual properties especially when you are working in the research area. It was a good course with lots of experience from the industry and academical world.» - The IP and patent parts were the most intresting, most related to my work» - It did not feel very organized, however it was interesting to hear all the lecturers experiences.» - Overall the content of the course was good. Most interesting thing for me was about patents.» - I liked the course. Maybe the material was a little bit scattered because of several lecturers. Information about the assignments was distributed late.» - Interesting» - Interesting lecures but the rest was not very well organized. The examination especially could be improved» - Interesting lecture series, but not enough workload.» - It was a lot of new information in the beginning so it was hard to understand in the beginning. However, I think the lecturers did a good job» - The overall impression is good. I was expecting a boring series of lectures in bland ethics discussions that we"ve all heard before. This course was not like that at all. Instead I got a fresh and balanced view on the topics.» - Good. Lots of examples given to illustrate the course. Lots of discussion.» 6. Was the course relevant in relation to your own research process? Why/why not?- Yes indeed. I can relate in questions regarding the cooperation between different researchers. How important it is to write contracts etc.»- the etichal part is not that relavant since i work with material research, polymeric fibres.» - Yes, there could be a potential for imfringement as well as new patent opportunities.» - Yes, as I am working on projects which are related to the companies of my supervisor. So this course encourage me to do my research on Ethics point of view and this was the question which has been raised during the lecture. » - Yes. I am currently working on IP issues related to my research.» - No, guess you"ll disagree.» - Yes, it opened my eyes and convinced me of andto the importance of IP issues in research in both academy and industry.» - Not really because I"m working with theoretical physics. However still acquired useful information.» - Good to get some basics regarding the area. Might be useful later.» - No for my PhD work. But I learned a lot and I think it could be relevant in the future» - Yes. As a developer/researcher many of the topics are of course relevant.» - Relevant yes and no as my PhD topic is theoretic.» 7. Has the course had any impact on how you think about and manage the research results from your research process?- It has. I have learned about the importance how to store the data etc.»- not yet.» - Yes» - Yes, as I am using a technology which is a patent of my supervisor. So right now I am thinking on how to secure my intellectual property within this patent.» - Yes. I will think more strategic in the future.» - No» - So far not in any specific situation but I believe I will benefit from the course in the future.» - Yes a little.» - Not in my research area» - Yes.» - yes as the course presents all possible ways to communicate our results. Sometimes I think we tend to forget then publishing is not the only way.» 8. What would you recommend us to do differently next year, do you have suggestions for improvements?- It is fun to get some feedback on what you have written in the assignments. I would like to have it back and commented. »- nothing» - More structural approach and don"t save all the assignments to the end» - No comments» - A course book would be good. (The notes distributed are almost a course book.)» - Some lecturers had clearly political opinions and goals, this is fine. However, these opinions where emphasised a little to much. First state the facts, then speak your opinions. » - Give suggestions of literature in connection with the home assignments, the only sources we were our own recollections of lecures. Follow up home assignments with seminars in smaller groups. The lecture that was cancelled could have been announced more clearly.» - Start with written assignments earlier and give some feedback.» - I think you need some more information for the assignment. The session we had after it would be better to have before it instead» - Stay on schedule. The course accidentally got a one-week shift and that made planning a hassle.» - Study different cases in groups and then discuss the cases in front of the class with a help of a powerpoint presentation, could be a good exercise. » 9. What was your general impression of the administration of the course?- The administration was good!»- good» - Well» - The course was very well organized.» - OK.» - Good» - It was not clear who to contact with questions as we got mails from many different persons. When asking questions by mail, we got no answer.» - It was good but some assignments were given too late.» - Could be improved, was a bit unclear regarding the assignemnets. Deadlines were changed etc.» - Interesting!! Much of new and important information. However, 3 hours of listening can be hard some time - even if it is interesting » - Good ,though some information emails came out rather late.» - Good except regarding the home assignment. Deadlines sometimes not very clear.» 10. Course literature- Ok!»- good.» - Sorry, but it did not feel like it was very important for my research and interest within the field of IP» - Enough for the course.» - OK.» - OK» - For most of the course (Ulfs part) we had none and the articles we got for Boos and Mats lectures was not followed up very much.» - Ok» - Some of the papers were not very interesting. I would prefer reading instructions for the pdf-book. » - Good on the web!» - Quite unstructured» - Did not read it (the book that was supplied).» 11. Miscellaneous comments- No comments»- Interesting course. I"m satisfied.» - I didn"t get any feedback on the case study which would have been nice.» - I think all lecture speakers did a good job. According the cases, I think the first one was quit difficult but you learned a lot during the writing. » Part II: Lectures, Exercises and Assignments12. The lectures by Ulf Petrusson- Interesting and fun to hear stories from the "real world". »- great and intresting. » - More structure and useful slides, but he is a good speaker» - Good» - Interesting and entertaining.» - Impressed » - Very interesting and useful with good examples of how IP issues come into play in different situations. There was not much evolution along the course and the different lectures felt quite similar.» - Good and interesting lectures, although they started a bit late sometimes. Felt more like discussion sessions.» - Good» - The first lectures very good, last one or two lectures less good» - Good, though a bit confused and late almost every time. » 13. The lecture by Mats Lundqvist- Honestly I do not remember too much from this lecture...»- good» - Very good!» - Good» - Likes money» - It was very good. Good interaction with audience.» - Good» - Very good, nice coherent presentation.» 14. The lecture by Boo Edgar- Interesting person to listen to. He had humor and was entertaining.»- NA» - Interesting experiences, liked it a lot!» - Very Good» - Interesting.» - Really impressive» - Very good lecturer and very interesting lecture.» - Good» - I can"t remember what it was about specifically, but Boo Edgar was a nice lecturer that gave a solid impression.» 15. The case part I- I did miss that lecture.»- it were hard to get into the case and to see what the task was» - Confusing and poorly explained, I still don"t know if I have interpreted the assignment in the right way» - Tough to start but manageable.» - Interesting.» - Confusing, more my fault then yours I guess.» - It was good but wanted some feedback on it.» - Would prefer a task where I analyzed my own research. Perhaps it could be a group assignment to get more interaction among the students.» - Interesting with some role playing even if the subject was a obviously slightly modified recreations of real world events.» 16. The case part II- Interesting.»- it were hard to get into the case and to see what the task was» - Better than part I» - Tough to start but manageable.» - Interesting but hard and less defined.» - Really happy it did not had a gender perspective!» - Ok» - Same as above.» - This I felt was really hard and I got the impression that the expectations were not properly discussed and explained during the lectures in the course.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14%