Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Compiler construction, Lp4 VT11, TDA282/DIT300

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-06-05
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Rebecca S»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 15%
Around 20 hours/week»13 50%
Around 25 hours/week»5 19%
Around 30 hours/week»2 7%
At least 35 hours/week»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

26 svarande

0%»1 3%
25%»4 15%
50%»5 19%
75%»9 34%
100%»7 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.65 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.03

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 19%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»17 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»23 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 3%
Yes, definitely»21 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 7%

- Some of the learning out comes are only reached if you do extensions to the project. Data flow is not part of the examination at all.» (Yes, definitely)
- We have the project instead of the exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»4 15%
To some extent»7 26%
Large extent»9 34%
Great extent»6 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- The lecture slides on the course page have been very helpful. They are easy to read and show a lot useful information.» (Large extent)
- The lectures/slides were of course very helpful for the project.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»8 30%
Some extent»3 11%
Large extent»11 42%
Great extent»4 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Didn"t use any book» (Small extent)
- I didn"t use it at all» (Small extent)
- Didn"t use any literature.» (Small extent)
- Course literature wasn"t that needed. But the free linked online documentation was VERY useful.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»8 30%
Very well»17 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 19%
Very good»10 38%
I did not seek help»10 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 19%
Very well»18 69%
I did not seek coopeation»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 3%
Good»12 46%
Excellent»12 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- I would have learned more about data flow had it been part of the project.» (Good)
- I have no real objections. Coding a compiler was pure fun.» (Excellent)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Keeep the array work in the JVM part of the project.»
- The test suites, as they are very useful for identifying all bugs in the code.»
- The extra credit system.»
- Björn von Sydow is a very great teacher»
- Sydow»
- The project.»
- The project should be preserved.»
- the examination. one cannot learn to write a compiler in any other way than writing one»
- I"m Erasmus Student, I have finished my exchange year!»
- The two parts jvm and llvm»
- The project, the structure of optional extra credits.»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I talked to Björn about this, but adding a short introduction to the state monad in Haskell would help a lot.»
- 4 weeks on the LLVM part ,)»
- Better instructions regarding the testsuite.»
- Even given a good lecturer, lectures on optimizations can easily get sluggish, I don"t know how to make it better (sorry :() but that’,s the only thing I can think about o/»
- More advanced extensions like x86 code generation should give more than one credit.»
- Add some videos for the course.»
- ---»
- "m Erasmus Student, I have finished my exchange year!»
- The part where you get everything to work the lexer, parser and where you write the TypeChecker does take much more time then the first week. Writing the jvm compiler takes some time perhaps 3 weeks but the llvm version is just a rewrite of the jvm compiler and it takes very little time compared to the TypeChecker. You should give more time to write the TypeChecker and less for the llvm compiler.»
- I was very nervous for the oral exam, but it worked really nice. Perhaps it should be called meeting instead of exam?»
- The first deadline could be sooner. It doesn"t take four weeks to solve the first assignment.»

14. Additional comments

- I did enjoy this course a great deal, good work.»
- great course»
- "m Erasmus Student, I have finished my exchange year!»
- Great course, I had alot of fun even if I was really stressed at the deadlines :)»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.03
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från