Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Frontiers of programming language technology, Lp4 VT11, TDA261/DIT760
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-06-05 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Rebecca S»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*7 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 6 | | 85% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 14% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*7 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 14% |
75%» | | 3 | | 42% |
100%» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.71
Goals and goal fulfilment3. How understandable are the course goals?7 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 28% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 14% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 4 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?6 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 6 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?7 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 28% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 71% |
- Project based !» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 57% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - The extent it can given the format of the course. » (To some extent)
- Plenty of interesting presentations and insightful comments.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 - Not applicable!» (?)
- Hasn"t been any real course literature, but the recommended links and papers were very good places.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?7 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 71% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - Wish you could have a webpage where we can submit our reports and projects there, instead of our own web hosts.» (Rather well)
- Grading of the different assignments were unfortunately very slow» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?7 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 71% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - Dave is very knowledgeable on a lot of subjects.» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?7 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 42% |
I did not seek coopeation» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions11. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
Good» | | 3 | | 42% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - I dropped out at the midway point, approximately, so my opinions should not be taken to concern the rest of the course.» (Good)
- The course is very good to familiarize students with current researches in the area.» (Good)
- It"s a course I"ll definitely recommend for 4th and 5th years.» (Excellent)
- IT WAS BRILLIANT!» (Excellent)
12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The presentations with opportunities for discussions and questions. Also: Dave.»
- Dave :)»
13. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Please change the whole CS field so there"s less focus on static type systems, and then maybe the presentations on static type systems will be fewer next year.»
- I wish there could be multiple deadlines for projects. Setting only a final deadline is not as efficient as setting multiple(2 or 3) deadlines. The latter will help students be more motivated, and more committed to getting their projects done on time!»
14. Additional comments- Many students have problems getting around to do the project, which is both because it"s put so late and because the instructions are so vague. Still, I think it"s a good moment and I don"t quite know what to change about it...»
Additional comments Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.71 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.42* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|