Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Unix internals, Lp4 VT11, EDA203 /DIT681

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-06-05
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 22%
Kontaktperson: Rebecca S»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 42%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

14 svarande

0%»4 28%
25%»5 35%
50%»3 21%
75%»2 14%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.07

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 35%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 83%
No, the goals are set too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»6 42%
Yes, definitely»4 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

- it was just to look up in the book» (To some extent)
- Many had the attitude that since they could use the book on the exam they wouldn"t have to study. I did study, so I noticed a difference when talking about the exam with friends. They hadn"t understood many of the concepts brought up in the exam. One guy had the attitude that when he sees a term he doesn"t understand, he"ll just look it up in the book and immediately find the answer. This apparently worked for one or two questions, but he did rather poorly in general, as can be expected. These fellows didn"t attend the lectures either.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»8 61%
To some extent»3 23%
Large extent»2 15%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.53

- I did not attend the lectures, since they are of extremely poor quality.» (Small extent)
- went to 2 lectures, didn"t give anything» (Small extent)
- The lectures are so boring ,and the lecturer just reads the text,he doesn"t explain anything ,and has difficulty explaining concepts...» (Small extent) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- As usual this teacher has very poor teaching and language skills.» (Small extent) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- FreeBSD is a big system and the big is rather comprehensive. The teaching was very useful to guide my studies.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»4 30%
Great extent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- read the book» (Great extent)
- The book is the only option for this course like this that is based on FreeBSD. Studying the source directly is infeasible without some guide like the book.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 15%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- It would be good to use the Fire system for labs.» (Rather well)
- There was a no-nonsense web page that worked much better than these other websites with a plethora of subpages, frames, forms and other complicating factors.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Rather poor»2 15%
Rather good»3 23%
Very good»4 30%
I did not seek help»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»2 15%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»7 53%
I did not seek coopeation»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- "coopeation" is misspelt in this question (in the web form).» (Very well)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»3 23%
Fair»3 23%
Adequate»4 30%
Good»2 15%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- The laborations were OK, but the rest, by which I mean the lectures, were sub standard. You"re not supposed to rely solely on the course book to pass the course (the lectures was more or less reading from the book)» (Poor)
- this course is very useful if taught well ,and can be a very positive point in your academic resume but it"s not offered in an efficient way» (Poor)
- To me, it´,s hard to attend all the questions in the exam. Questions are very much narrative.» (Adequate)
- If there are more practice and less theory, it should be better» (Adequate)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Having laborations.»
- the labs »
- NA»
- labs»
- the course itself»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I"m sorry to say this, but the lecturer and examinar. I almost find it embarrassing towards all the international students in the class who come a long way to Chalmers, and receive education of this lousy quality.»
- lecturer»
- NA»
- lectures»
- Lecturer»
- the lecturer ,lab assistant »

14. Additional comments

- NA»
- The course maybe should change focus to a more modern and used operating system, such as Linux.»
- please give courses to better teachers!» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.07
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.26

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från