Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Fundamental structural dynamics-11, MME062
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-04-04 - 2011-04-16 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52% Kontaktperson: Peter Folkow»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.13 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 15% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 30% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 23% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 4 | | 30% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 - Normal amount.» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 2 | | 15% |
75%» | | 7 | | 53% |
100%» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 3. What was your priority of this course compared to the other courses you follow?13 svarande
Much lower» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat lower» | | 0 | | 0% |
Equal» | | 9 | | 69% |
Somewhat higher» | | 3 | | 23% |
Much higher» | | 1 | | 7% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.38
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?13 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 15% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 23% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 11 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Yes, definitely» | | 9 | | 81% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.81
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 75% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.08 8. What is your opinion of the lectures?Any suggestions for improvement?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 38% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.38 - If possible, some 3D model should be shown, especially in plate or wave section.» (Rather good)
9. What is your opinion of the problem solving sessions?Any suggestions for improvement?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 2 | | 18% |
Rather good» | | 8 | | 72% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 9% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.9 10. Would you like more detailed solutions?Where all calculations are shown explicitly.13 svarande
Yes» | | 7 | | 63% |
No» | | 4 | | 36% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.36 - Would be good to have this kind of solutions for at least one question of each type.» (Yes)
- I think there were lot"s of examples, at least in the problem solving sessions» (No)
11. Solving the more extensive problems.What strategy do you prefer for the more involved solutions (besides putting them on the home page):Matrisfråga only blackboard 13 svarande
Very bad» | | 2 | | 15% |
Rather bad» | | 2 | | 15% |
OK» | | 2 | | 15% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 15% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 combine blackboard and projector 13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 3 | | 23% |
OK» | | 3 | | 23% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 30% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 only projector 13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 7 | | 53% |
OK» | | 3 | | 23% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 15% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 7% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 nothing in class, only homepage 13 svarande
Very bad» | | 6 | | 50% |
Rather bad» | | 5 | | 41% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 8% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 12. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 41% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.91 13. What is you opinion of the compendium?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 2 | | 15% |
Rather bad» | | 5 | | 38% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 30% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 15% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - Should include more steps. The hand-outs from Peter were better.» (Rather bad)
- Some chapters are not really in line with the lectures and all examples are always the most simple case.» (Rather bad)
- Many of the presented situations are not allways easy to imagine how the look in reality. It would be of great help if some more pictures were included in the compendium.» (Rather bad)
- The compendium only explains the most simplest cases, so the lecture notes were more important for the learning.» (Rather good)
- If more pictures could be added, it would be better.» (Very good)
14. What is your opinion of changing the literature to a more comprehensive (and expensive) textbook?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 3 | | 23% |
Rather bad» | | 2 | | 15% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 15. What is your opinion of the assignments?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - Made it easier to work with the course over the whole period and definetly helped to prepare for the exam.» (Very good)
- they really help and impose us to learn the course materials in depth.» (Very good)
16. Would you prefer simpler problems (and less bonus points) to concentrate on other course issues?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 8 | | 88% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
No opinion» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.22 - No» (?)
- No, it"s good as it is» (Small extent)
17. What is your opinion of the written exam?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 9 | | 69% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 30% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 - A little bit trickier compared with old exams.» (Very good)
18. Do your course grades (Fail, 3, 4, 5) reflect your knowledge in your opinion?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 41% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - Yes» (?)
- the grade does not show knowledge somehow,because in some parts I lost main part of the point although I knew that part very well.» (Some extent)
Study climate19. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 15% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 84% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 20. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 30% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 53% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 21. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 23% |
High» | | 10 | | 76% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - high, but not too high» (High)
22. How was the total workload this study period?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 38% |
High» | | 6 | | 46% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76
Summarizing questions23. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 11 | | 84% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 24. To what extent have you been able to understand the teachers presentation in English?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Great extent» | | 9 | | 69% |
Genomsnitt: 3.69 25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Assignments»
- you shuold preserve this kind of assigment with the bonus points. The lessons with the projector and the printed sheets are good too.»
- Lecturer and assignments.»
- »
- The Lecturer»
26. What should definitely be changed to next year?- One hour to presente mathematica if the students haven"t knowkedges. maybe less calculations in the hand and more with mathematica during the solving sessions»
- The problem solving sessions could be much more efficient.»
27. Additional comments- I didn"t understand the matematica examples, it was a little diffuse. At the time they were introduced I think a lot of the students didn"t really understood it. Maybe it could be done later in the course. I think the idea of visualization whats happening in this course is very important and it could be more extensive to next year.»
- »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|