Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road Vehicle Aerodynamics, MTF235

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-31 - 2011-04-30
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Helena Martini»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»6 26%
Around 15 hours/week»7 30%
Around 20 hours/week»5 21%
Around 25 hours/week»5 21%
At least 30 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.39

- Formula student» (Around 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»5 21%
75%»6 26%
100%»12 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- it was unfortunatelly due to formula student that i missed many classes..... but those i could attend have been very interessting!!» (50%)
- about 90%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 69%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 85%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- Yes, and the ammount of work is perfect to make it an interesting course where you learn much, have fun learning and don"t tear ones hair out due to overload. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»9 39%
Large extent»10 43%
Great extent»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- The book is the best money I"ve ever spent» (Great extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»12 54%
Very well»9 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The course book was not avaiable at Cremona and rather difficult to get. » (Rather badly)
- All clear» (Very well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»7 30%
Very good»15 65%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Helena and Lisa were always willing to answer questions» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»9 39%
Very well»14 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

9. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»2 8%
Low»4 17%
Adequate»17 73%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

Summarizing questions

10. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»2 8%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»8 34%
Excellent»10 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

- Very intresting course with good teachers. » (Excellent)
- Best course ever» (Excellent)
- One of the best courses ever during my time at chalmers (since 1"st grade)» (Excellent)

11. What is your impression of the lectures?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»4 18%
Good»9 40%
Excellent»8 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Best lectures, F1 was really good» (Excellent)

12. What is your impression of the guest lectures?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»12 52%
Excellent»8 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- some were very good but some were rather poor» (Adequate)
- F1 was really good and VW finally something different from Volvo» (Excellent)

13. What is your impression of the exercise sessions?

23 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 21%
Good»15 65%
Excellent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Bit too few examples so that there aren"t enough to have quite some on the board and then some to work with, though easy to manage on your own. » (Good)

14. What is your impression of the post processing task in ParaView?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»7 30%
Good»12 52%
Excellent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Though could be done bit later so that the phenonema studied is understood, or that there is some text to read before. » (Good)

15. How would you rate the project work?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 8%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»10 43%
Excellent»10 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

16. What did you think about the project layout?

How would you rate the project layout with pre-study, wind tunnel laboration, report and presentation?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»13 56%
Excellent»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Very good with a pre-study. » (Excellent)

17. How would you rate the wind tunnel laboratory work?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»11 47%
Excellent»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- More time is needed for preparation and lab to make it perfect. Was bit stressful. » (Good)
- Really interesting » (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Wind tunnel lab and visit to Volvo. »
- the windtunnel project and also the problem solving sessions were helpful for understanding. the guest lectures are interessting and should appear again.»
- the wind tunnel laboratory work and good guest lectures.»
- Lab»
- Project work and Post-processing»
- Lennarts lectures, Volkswagen lecture, lab.»
- The wind tunnel!»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the course contents should defenitely be changed. it was not appropriate for a master level for a university like Chalmers.it was rather a bechelor level course and even some parts were at high school level. »
- Heat transfer lecture, Helena did a pretty good job in explaining but it is quite difficult subject»
- The examination did not represent the lectures and course content. The lectures were very basic and did not treat aerodynamic theory in dept. The examination was all of a sudden very theoretical.This should be treated in class more. »
- none»
- The expectations/learning outcome could be raised.»

20. Additional comments

- Great course»
- at first i had high hopes to learn a lot of new and high level stuff about the road vehicle aerodynamics but at the and i was rather dissatisfied with what i learned from this course.»
- One of the best class I have ever taken, if I fail the final examination I will be glad to retake the exam.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från