Visa resultat

Chalmers Masters Programme Evaluation 2011

Masters Programme

1. Architecture and Civil Engineering

Architecture»		36		18%
Architecture and Engineering»		8		4%
Design and Construction Project Management»		31		16%
Design for Sustainable Development»		33		17%
Geo and Water Engineering»		25		12%
Interior Architecture»		0		0%
Sound and Vibration»		8		4%
Structural Engineering and Building Performance Design»		52		26%

Genomsnitt: 4.52

2. Bioscience, Molecular science and Chemical Engineering

Bioinformatics and System Biology»		11		9%
Biotechnology»		47		38%
Chemistry and Bioscience»		16		13%
Innovative and Sustainable Chemical Engineering»		47		38%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

3. Computer Science, Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

Biomedical Engineering»		29		11%
Communication Engineering»		37		14%
Computer Science: Algorithms, Languages and Logic»		30		12%
Integrated Electronic System Design»		29		11%
Interaction Design»		24		9%
Networks and Distributed Systems»		43		17%
Secure and Dependable Computer systems»		12		4%
Software Engineering and Technology»		43		17%
Intelligent Systems Design»		1		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

4. Engineering for Sustainable Development

Electric Power Engineering»		42		32%
Environmental Measurements and Assessments»		17		13%
Industrial Ecology - For a Sustainable Society»		32		24%
Sustainable Energy Systems»		38		29%

Genomsnitt: 2.51

5. Management of Innovation and Technology

Business Design»		31		17%
International Project Management»		11		6%
Management of Economis and Innovation»		42		24%
Nordic Master in Maritime Management»		9		5%
Quality and Operations Management»		37		21%
Supply Chain Management»		43		24%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

6. Mechanical, Automation, and Industrial Design Engineering

Advanced Engineering Materials»		30		10%
Automotive Engineering»		44		15%
Industrial Design Engineering»		36		12%
Naval Architecture»		20		6%
Product Development»		36		12%
Production Engineering»		38		13%
Solid and Fluid Mechanics»		33		11%
Systems, Control and Mechatronics»		50		17%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

7. Microtechnology and Nano Science

Materials and Nanotechnology»		31		36%
Microtechnology»		13		15%
Nanoscale Science and Technology»		20		23%
Wireless and Photonic Engineering»		21		24%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

8. Physics, Space Science and Mathematics

Applied Physics»		23		20%
Complex Adaptive Systems»		28		25%
Engineering Mathematics and Computational Sciences»		20		17%
Fundamental Physics»		13		11%
Nuclear Engineering»		19		16%
Radio and Space Science»		9		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

Background and Introduction

9. How satisfied are you with the Masters programme so far?

Not at all»		9		0%
Not so satisfied»		75		5%
Neither/Nor»		90		6%
Satisfied»		732		55%
Very satisfied»		409		30%
No opinion»		8		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

10. What year did you start the programme?

2007»		22		1%
2008»		80		6%
2009»		609		46%
2010»		609		46%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

11. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

Sweden - Chalmers»		735		55%
Sweden - another university»		29		2%
University outside Sweden - Europe»		86		6%
University outside Sweden - NOT Europe»		437		32%
Other»		38		2%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

12. Are you

Female»		404		30%
Male»		916		69%

Genomsnitt: 1.69

13. How satisfied are you with the information (before applying) about the Masters programme (MP)?

1323 svarande

Not at all»		24		1%
Not so satisfied»		156		11%
Neither/Nor»		219		16%
Satisfied»		733		55%
Very satisfied»		178		13%
No opinion»		14		1%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

14. From where did you get the most important information about the programme?

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The web»		885		66%
Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers»		398		29%
Presentation/Information within Chalmers»		291		21%
Presentations/information outside Chalmers»		21		1%
Written information (not web)»		89		6%
Friends»		507		37%
Other sources (please comment)»		31		2%

- I heard from my friends.» (The web)
- Own research and visits to the relevant departments» (Other sources (please comment))
- I had to search on my own. Look up students and teachers to ask them. All on my own.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Companies attending Chalmers to give examples of job opportunities.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- I took an introduction course in sound and vibration» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- It was until I arrive to Sweden when I finally understood what was the Master program fully about.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- programme coordinator» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Higher Education commission of Pakistan» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Professors» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends)
- Databases about Education in Sweden» (The web, Friends)
- CIRC Forum» (The web)
- Personal phone call to the person responsible for the programme.» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Tidigare studentern från programmet var lättast att få information av. » (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- through mails from the master programme head» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- Garantiplatsen från högskoleingenjörsutbildningen hade en del i det.» (The web)
- Apart from the above I discussed the matter with two master coordinators and read quite a few old course evaluations.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- By random slection of one poster» (Other sources (please comment))
- I contacted the person in student center "Olgas trapor" about the master programm which include the track (track courses) of my interest.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Former erasmus» ()
- from the book» (The web)
- www.studera.nu www.studyinsweden.se» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- Erasmus mundus master in nanoscience and nanotechnology» (The web)
- Information from my uncle and aunt.They are living in Sweden.» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- The information has always been the big problem at Chalmers, We never know what happens. It is a huge problem!!!» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- www.studyinsweden.se» (Other sources (please comment))
- World Ranking List» (Other sources (please comment))
- relatives in Sweden» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- E-mail contact with studievägledare on the bachelor program and the master program. Web is quite messy, especially with the new web page leaving a lot of broken links. Both links in question 16+ is broken, just to take a few examples here.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Sent e-mails to the alumni or current students from their facebook group» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- There are shortage of information in here. For example when studens arrive late, there are no enough information given. Due to this reason, students do not know whom they should talk to and exposed to take unimporant courses. I think there should be well documented infromation provided on each students web account, that whom they should talk, about consultancey etc. For example if a student is from software enegineering and technology filed, you can write same informatin filled with the contacts with their address and as well the right and responsibilities of the studnets.» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends)
- CIRC (Chalmers International Reception Committee)» (The web)
- no where the information wasn"t useful» ()
- Industry contacts» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- I didn´,t get any» ()
- I mailed to my course coordinator Anna Moses. She was very kind in replying all my E-Mails and also added confidence in me before I started from India. » (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Classmates» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Written information (not web))
- Speaking of information sources, I can never find anything on the new web site, but maybe-maybe, it"s just a habit. What is annoying though is that I wasn"t able to use either of the following (next section) links to programme goals. The first link is broken, and the second one gives me "access denied" error even after entering my Chalmers username and password. How other people are supposed to get this info, I can only guess...» (The web)
- Studentcentrum» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Written information (not web), Other sources (please comment))
- Visste egentligen inte så jättemycket om det innan.» (Other sources (please comment))
- But the web page could be more informative.» (The web)
- friends in Sweden» (The web)
- email to program director malin, she was very helpful!» (The web)
- Discussion with responsible teachers.» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- The master coordinator of our program did a good work with giving out information. Especially the fact he had done a serious booklet with all information abour the program including each course. » (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Written information (not web))
- By mailing Sverker Molander and asking quesions and thru reading the master program information on the studentportal» (The web, Written information (not web))
- Previous courses» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Written information (not web), Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- From a professor teaching both at my past University and Chalmers.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- some friends already studying in the same program at chalmers» (The web)
- Read courses from the program in earlier studies. » (The web)
- The is is a need for printed information» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- I talked to students that were going on the MEI program when I applied!» (Other sources (please comment))

Your own effort

15. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

1327 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»		114		8%
Between 30-40 hours/week»		429		32%
Between 40-50 hours/week»		500		37%
Between 50-60 hours/week»		219		16%
More than 60 hours/week»		65		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.76

Goals and goal fulfilment

16. Have you seen the goals of the Masters programme (before now)?

Yes (more than 5 times)»		95		7%
Yes (between 2 and 5 times)»		439		33%
Yes (once)»		433		32%
No»		240		18%
No opinion»		113		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

17. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		17		1%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		296		22%
The goals are clear enough»		595		45%
The goals are very clear»		88		6%
No opinion»		313		23%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

18. Do you think the goals are reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		12		0%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		72		5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		859		65%
No, the goals are a bit high»		21		1%
No, the goals are set far too high»		1		0%
No opinion»		343		26%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

19. Do you think the goals are fulfilled within the programme?

No, not at all»		16		1%
To some extent»		221		16%
Almost»		406		31%
Yes, definitely»		319		24%
No opinion»		342		26%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Programme layout/structure/design

20. How satisfied are you with the programme curriculum?

Not at all»		16		1%
Not so satisfied»		140		10%
Neither/Nor»		168		12%
Satisfied»		762		57%
Very satisfied»		167		12%
No opinion»		70		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

21. Is there any subject/course that you would like to add into the programme?

Yes»		518		39%
No»		341		26%
No opinion»		446		34%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- Nuclear chemistry and sustainable energy future » (?)
- a bit more business oriendes since envrionmental issues needs to be integrated in all f the company and not as a separate section» (?)
- can include some good practical lab classes during the study period» (?)
- More courses related to the specialisation should be added» (?)
- Software Engineering, Courses that require team work within teams of 6-8 students, Courses that require oral presentations, Courses that require multi-core programming should be added, Haskell programming should be added to mandatory courses » (?)
- Lacks internationalization.» (?)
- in generell more effort should be spent on teaching software. eg catia and most important cfd simulation programs...» (?)
- More renewable energy technology» (Yes)
- More courses in Material Physics» (Yes)
- More courses involving VHDL and/or hardware design please. There are too few of these, especially for the second year. » (Yes)
- "Real life project management" for understanding that models and theory doesn"t begin to solve problems in an organization. » (Yes)
- Radiation Protection , Radiotherapy (with Nuclear Medicine) and there should be an option for possessional training in hospitals or in industries. » (Yes)
- Aerospace engineering» (Yes)
- Could be better if the programme could cooperate with system,control and mechanics programme paying attention on aircrafts, rockets and satellites system design, reliable control and efficient maintenance and so on. » (Yes)
- A case with some complicated / extensive Excel calculations» (Yes)
- I felt that it should be possible to take all three of: Marine Structures Advanced Course, Fatigue Design, CFD. In my year all three was given the same period which made it impossible to attend all three of them.» (Yes)
- Network Communication Data Transfer in physical layer CCNP» (Yes)
- Management and economics of social entrepreneurship » (Yes)
- CFD» (Yes)
- Antropology, sociology, economics, corporate law/ IP » (Yes)
- Entrepreneurship» (Yes)
- A more interantional outlook on different energy systems in the world.» (Yes)
- It doesn"t need to be comnpulsory courses, but it would be valuable for those of us intending to do a career in the industry to have larger opportunities to do courses in economics and project management. Besides, Intellectual Properties would also be a good thing to learn more about. » (Yes)
- More economics» (Yes)
- Composite mechanics.» (Yes)
- courses related to wireless communications(Channel Modeling, a specific course about OFDM is also needed like the Wireless systems program in LTH(http://www.eit.lth.se/course/EIT140), a course about the advanced and hot topics in wireless communications)» (Yes)
- More building physics and perhaps some course in controll systems.» (Yes)
- internship, individual projects, more time with supervisors in the projects» (Yes)
- "Applied Statistics", to understand how statistics are used (the statistics background chalmers students have are focused on the mathematical background)» (Yes)
- I would like to have more connections to reality, either by adding case studies, or by adding subjects that are graspable. Eg that we study something which is not just talking» (Yes)
- Some course with thermal management in cars, or take this into consideration in other courses.» (Yes)
- something including art» (Yes)
- Metals and ceramics.» (Yes)
- A course in Six Sigma, a course in CAD and some kind of economics course. » (Yes)
- laser physics» (Yes)
- More plain math, e.g. innovation economics.» (Yes)
- A course or two in "pure" VHDL programming, focusing more on coding tricks, implementation and how to optimize synthesis in different ways. Maybe paralellisation and pipelining aswell.» (Yes)
- Paperchemistry» (Yes)
- Maybe a finite element course that mainly focuses on acoustical problems» (Yes)
- More management for IT» (Yes)
- Advanced chemical reaction engineering» (Yes)
- More focus on the petroleum industry.» (Yes)
- collaboration with the Industrial Design Masters Programme» (Yes)
- Some environmental courses, e.g. new technologies for sustainability.» (Yes)
- a course about solar energy» (Yes)
- corporate finance» (Yes)
- lite mer om pappersmaterial» (Yes)
- logistics, 6sigma,process selection» (Yes)
- More economy classes. And better background for this.» (Yes)
- A bit of an overlap between courses, but I guess it"s always like that» (Yes)
- Approximately, More than 80% courses are theoretical based and looks just stories. There must be at least one course that could give some calculative figures about financial benefits when some one or a company works with environment.» (Yes)
- Some kind of security related modelling course. That is, how to model an actual secure system. The Internet measurement/traffic classification lectures in the Adv. topics in networks and dist. systems course were very interesting. Perhaps it would be possible to contruct a course dealing with these subjects?» (Yes)
- Make Tissue Engineering 1 a cumpolsory course and Biopolymers and Biocompisite an elective course.» (Yes)
- Stochastic analysis, Variational calculus» (Yes)
- More courses for the specialisation in production systems.» (Yes)
- 1)Engineering mechanics » (Yes)
- Appreciation Course» (Yes)
- Mer praktik. t.ex mer labbar där man skruvar sönder motorer och sätter ihop dom igen. testkör på riktigt. skruvar ner en hel bil för att titta hur det ser ut egentligen bakom skalet.» (Yes)
- Farmakologi och sjukdomslära från GU. Fler kurser på det temat. » (Yes)
- operation management» (Yes)
- Some more courses on Geotechnics. The program mainly focuses Water Environment and Treatment, but not that much Geo.» (Yes)
- more focus on sales can be useful» (Yes)
- Management of IP/IA in mature industries» (Yes)
- Advanced VHDL» (Yes)
- Relay and Protection» (Yes)
- Maybe one basic finance course» (Yes)
- More actual development courses using Industry-frameworks and such.» (Yes)
- Jag tycker inte att kurserna går tillräckligt djupt. Det är för mycket repetition från grundutbildningen.» (Yes)
- Biomaterials» (Yes)
- Matlab basic course» (Yes)
- Corporate finance» (Yes)
- More Geotechnical courses with focus on tunnel construction and rock construction. Maybe also some more construction courses like Concrete Construction which is good to know more about. The traffic courses could be much better than they are today !» (Yes)
- More relevant technical deepening courses, useless to study courses adapted to mechanical engineers.» (Yes)
- a more in depth course in operations management, Strategic Management» (Yes)
- polymers and composites» (Yes)
- more engine controls, emission control, » (Yes)
- Extended possibility and promotion of taking courses at other universities. More courses for social skills.» (Yes)
- Molecular Microscopy.» (Yes)
- Product Development Projects» (Yes)
- a practical course that focuses on a project conducted in the clean room. (We study nanotechnology and we visit the clean room only once during the "recommended" courses)» (Yes)
- A course in Computational Linguistics» (Yes)
- I think there are alot of courses at Teknisk Design that could be shared with Interaction Design» (Yes)
- Basic economic calculation of architectural projects» (Yes)
- I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE CONECTION TO COMPANIES AND TO REAL LIFE. THIS MASTER PROGRAM IS TOO MUCH "UPP IN THE BLUE"» (Yes)
- Seismic Engineering Bridge Engineering Structural Analysis» (Yes)
- More structurally oriented courses with deeper knowledge for design.» (Yes)
- complex analysis» (Yes)
- I would like a course that focuses on social issues and fair trade.» (Yes)
- A course named "Routing Technology" already exist in association with CCNA Exploration(4 parts). There should be another course like this in association with CCNP. I missed such type of course. There should also be a course in association of Red Hat Linux.» (Yes)
- Course about EHS or ISO regulation» (Yes)
- It would be interesting to have a wider selection of 7.5hp courses, with specialised focus. One theme that is missing is traditional building techniques and materials, another is sustainable landscaping and urban greenery.» (Yes)
- More course selection alternatives for the second year. » (Yes)
- Lean production Economy courses» (Yes)
- Programming course (Java, C/C++, .NET/C#) » (Yes)
- There would be nice with a specific course focusing only on commercial softwares. I"m taking the fluid specialisation, and in the courses there are some uses of the commercial softwares, but there ain"t a specific course were we can learn how they are built and how to use them well (kinda like we had a specific course for Pro/E / Catia in the bachelor degree)» (Yes)
- Matlab introduction- statistical and probability» (Yes)
- Electrical concerning courses» (Yes)
- some courses that discuss software design at a practical (coding) level rather than higher architectural level, such as design patterns.» (Yes)
- A course in preliminary mathematics, at least before Lp 3 year one. In algebras, group- and representation theory, spinors etc. All that is required in the courses QFT and string theory.» (Yes)
- I would like to see some kind of biomechanics course being introduced (not as mandatory but as optional courses). This is more for Chalmers in general and not so much as only the master"s programme.» (Yes)
- Economics, More energy» (Yes)
- I think it is useful if you add internship as part of program and lead students to future work specially in Architecture field which is difficult to find job after finishing studied.» (Yes)
- I would like to have more possibilities to chose courses within other program in the field of architecture and technic, as it is today we need to fight hard to have other courses then suggested ones and many times if you can chose a course it is imopssible due to the schedueles will not suite eachother. » (Yes)
- I study in the field of buidling physics and felt that availiable courses during some semesters were too few. I had to study courses which was outside my field. More info about courses from "Energy and environment" would be appreciated» (Yes)
- We have already taken some courses in our B.Sc so some courses could be added or replaced by more industrial-practical courses that usable in various chemical/oil&gas/petrochemical industries. » (Yes)
- Excel» (Yes)
- more Geotecnics» (Yes)
- try to integrate more architecture (like in sustainable building competition)» (Yes)
- Deeper knowledge about transportation (the knowledge that where in FTS and MPD where to general). Something about Porter... Reading CR right now, some more about the contact with the customer, like Key Account manager or framework agreements. Otherwise the most important is the understanding and not specific knowledges.» (Yes)
- Electrical power system and Renewable Energy (wind, wave, solar)» (Yes)
- Linear algebra for the first year.» (Yes)
- More Tissue engineering, aswell as more about implants and prosthesis. Cells and materia» (Yes)
- Concurrent programming» (Yes)
- Experience Design/Service Design» (Yes)
- Java course» (Yes)
- There are courses in testing, debugging and verification as well as software engineering using formal methods. These are state-of-the-art courses and i think there is a lack of testing in a process perspective. Testing in practice is not covered other than a small portion in agile development. » (Yes)
- Database security, Advanced computer security, Advanced network security, Distributed algorithms for databases, Developing load balancer for distributed systems» (Yes)
- Technology sales - 7,5hp» (Yes)
- I would like more courses in analysis» (Yes)
- more short project / studios» (Yes)
- Presentation/debate skills Internship» (Yes)
- Corporate Finance» (Yes)
- Add construction production courses into DCPM which focus on site management, time planning, production cycling etc.» (Yes)
- Quantum Optics» (Yes)
- more VHDL courses» (Yes)
- More CAD (make FEM-calculations in Inventor and so on)» (Yes)
- Project psychology» (Yes)
- In the first year, courses are compulsory such that you cannot take any other course from other programs. After the first year, students would have some knowledge in Electronic design but they do not have any knowledge in the areas that they supposed to work or find their projects such as biomedical, image processing, communications ,control/automation, signal processing... This is mostly critical when most of the students want to start their thesis right after finishing the first year. » (Yes)
- since it will be changed for next year and the changes looks good I"m quite satisfied. Just so you know: the link above with masterprogramm goals did as always when it comes to student pages on chalmers not lead anywhere or give any kind of information. » (Yes)
- more microwave courses» (Yes)
- control engineering and mechatronics» (Yes)
- I recommend more course to be added in the department (like in Geo technical investigation areas) so that the student can have more choice based on there interest» (Yes)
- Useful programming skills for communication engineers.» (Yes)
- Some courses from the math dept should be added as suggested / recommended courses (abstract algebra). Courses from the linguistics and the logic dept at GU could also be suggested / recommended.» (Yes)
- - Optics (i guess it would be useful for students interested in photonics) - planar transmission lines» (Yes)
- C, java ... programming, more practical courses in instrumentation, in image analysis..» (Yes)
- - Open Innovation course and project - Barriers and problems for innovation implementation (more empirical) - MEI Seminar II, or more extensive. - Product/Service development (from innovation focus) - Innovation in services - Finance of innovation - Practical issues about innovation (not just so theoretical) - Sustainable innovation (processes and products/services) - Eco-innovation (based on chemical-biological fundaments, not advanced thoug) - State of the Art technologiess (what"s next and how to hande it) (Emerging trends) - Many more that I cant remember rght now.» (Yes)
- Usage of plastic and composite materials in product construction. Selection of production method based on economical and volume based constraints. Conceptual form development and visualisation with the aid of 3D (not final shape definition aka alias). Science of colours - how to select and apply colours to elevate the intended design.» (Yes)
- Swedish for business design as its important to speak to people as part of the project year.» (Yes)
- More statistics and machine learning.» (Yes)
- A CAD-course, in a software like CATIA V5 or SolidWorks.» (Yes)
- Vi skulle definitivt ha mer ekonomikurser i programmet, och inte bara ha en valbar sista kurs. Som det är nu läser ungefär halva klassen extra på handels för att denna bit helt missas trots att programmet utger sig för att ge en bred bild av projektledning och då är ekonomi och ekonomistyrning otroligt viktigt. » (Yes)
- Some kind of application course in power converters, as the skills you currently get in how to actually work with them regarding stray inductances etc today is extremely rudementary at best.» (Yes)
- Material selection» (Yes)
- More connected to industry and current software engineering practices. » (Yes)
- Some course about commercial FEM programs.» (Yes)
- Computer Security is best learned through hands-on experience, which the program somewhat lacks. The labs are not "enough" and do not expose the whole extent of modern computer security issues. I think a Penetration Testing course with theoretical aspects, and lots of practical courses (centered around a project more than a written exam) would be really appreciated from most people following this program. I think the managerial aspects of computer security in companies should be discussed (risk assessment, response management, and again - penetration testing) . It is a topic which is mentioned in the Computer Security course but in my opinion could have a whole course dedicated to it.» (Yes)
- a Solid modelling programs deeply» (Yes)
- Leadership and communication. Getting the sustainable message out.» (Yes)
- structures of different materials» (Yes)
- Continuing, going deeper on communication (together with control), learning more about to handle CAN etc. I.e. what I want is to continue on something after "Real-time Control Systems" (SSY190)» (Yes)
- Mathematical opmisation» (Yes)
- biochemistry» (Yes)
- Swedish Language.» (Yes)
- material course that is designed specifically to the nuclear master» (Yes)
- Stochastic processes» (Yes)
- The programme has changed to next year, but I still feel that we lack a course in group theory and/or mathematical methods (such as some variational and functional calculus). In the string theory course I take now, the lack of group theory is quite clear.» (Yes)
- Deeper knowledge and higher level, it should be clear that it is a master"s program and not bachelor.» (Yes)
- I would like to have one more course on an advanced topic in solid mechanics, e.g. composite mechanics.» (Yes)
- Complexity Economics» (Yes)
- Studying laws for building and contracts» (Yes)
- Something related to Research Methodology which should be mandatory because this is a Master in Science (involves research and development in some extent).» (Yes)
- An electrical course and one course (now there is an elective one)and one focused on renewable energies implementation or about developing strategies for energy systems implementation.» (Yes)
- More elementary cleanroom processing, such as labs making a transistor» (Yes)
- Game Theory, More Network Theory. More Artificial Intelligence Methods.» (Yes)
- protection» (Yes)
- More courses regarding nanotechnology. Perhaps also a course about composites. » (Yes)
- Mpdcs is discontinued, so no use...» (Yes)
- Swedish language course» (Yes)
- CFD» (Yes)
- Autocad, tekla, revit or something like that.» (Yes)
- More about Lean Product Development and Kansei Engineering» (Yes)
- More ecology and environment courses» (Yes)
- The program needs more courses at is is now you have to select courses from other master programs in the atoumn of your second year.» (Yes)
- CAD, no students at civil engineering have more than approx. 2hp CAD, ant when applying for jobs this is often a requirement. An advanced course for this please, and take away heat & moisture engineering.» (Yes)
- More management» (Yes)
- sustainable development, ecodesign, env. policy instrument, global issues in sustainable development, project management, technical change and env.» (Yes)
- A subject related to advanced thermodynamics would be good. There is no work related to thermodynamics in KRT which is sad since thermodynamics is such an intricate part of Chem. engg. » (Yes)
- More about renewable energy generation» (Yes)
- About buildings energy systems » (Yes)
- Another studio about ecological city planning in the spring. As it is now you can either choose to go to Africa or study sust building.» (Yes)
- architectural light design» (Yes)
- Photo/graphical presentation like Photoshop or how to do good pictures and presentations» (Yes)
- Wireless Communication» (Yes)
- There is course called Design Methodology. Its super best and Prof. Lars Almefelt handing is amazing. Its now only 4 credits. I would like to make it 7.5 credits. The learnings in this is course very good.» (Yes)
- Maybe something that deals more with understanding the interaction of technical and natural systems.» (Yes)
- We should get different subjects when we come to Northumbria, because many courses are exactly the same that we already studied at chalmers (and it was better in chalmers)» (Yes)
- My subject (MPNET) has three specialization tracks: Security, Communication Networks and Distributed Systems. As for the Security track, there are currently a couple of specialized courses being taught by distinguished professors at Chalmers. However, regarding Communication Networks the specialty courses are few and even some (like Real Time Systems) are not that much related to Data Communication and Computer Networks. The same applies to Distributed Systems track since there are a few courses with focus on multiprocessor architectures (There is only one course named Parallel Computer Organization and Design). I suggest Chalmers embark upon holding courses with more focus on Communication and Distributed Systems tracks. Courses with topics like “,Network Simulations and measurements”, or “,Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, can be good candidates to for the Communication track. As for the Distributed Systems, since the era of Multi-core/Multi-processor has already begun, that would be very valuable to offer some course covering software as well as hardware aspects of Multi-core CPUs. The course content can cover topics such as parallel programming design and implementation for Multi-core architectures which are rampant nowadays. » (Yes)
- Intelectual Property» (Yes)
- -Environmental Risk Assessment -Environmental Impact Assessment » (Yes)
- more technical depth in some courses» (Yes)
- More courses about HVAC in the building performance deisgn track» (Yes)
- Design Patterns» (Yes)
- A detailed course on composite mechanics» (Yes)
- Perhaps computer architecture should be a mandatory course, since it"s very relevant to know the hardware for which we construct programs.» (Yes)
- Musical Acoustics. Signal Processing for Acoustics.» (Yes)
- Get rid some of the mandatory easier courses and replace them with something valueable in your later career. Abaqus, StarCCM+, Catia, programming or similar!» (Yes)
- C++ programming and OpenFOAM» (Yes)
- I think this is already happening but I"d like to see less computer science courses in the program and more software engineering and management courses.» (Yes)
- more courses about the practice of programming» (Yes)
- More geotechnics, more road courses, possibility to choose something from DCPM with project management or organisation» (Yes)
- the Organizational Behavior course was optional but I couldn"t take because of the limited number of students who could take part in the course. but I think the course is so useful and at least every one who is interested should be able to take it.» (Yes)
- Group Theory and more maths courses early on in the program.» (Yes)
- In the track "Building performance design" it would be good to have maybe one more Building physics course, and a course with where to learn COMSOL (more than 1 lecture in FEM-basics) etc.» (Yes)
- Lean Production» (Yes)
- Structure of the programme should completely be revised. Courses don"t go in a line with connection to each and many other missing point in this master programme. It should be improved.» (Yes)
- More geotechnics and civil engineering ie. rock construction and concreate construction courses less bouring environmental courses » (Yes)
- The MPBME programme is too general and would greatly benefit in making some compulsory courses elective and and introduce more technologically advanced courses in the field of signal processing and electrical engineering instead. Need a better focus area(s), I"m concerned that the programme today is not providing enough in depth skills.» (Yes)
- More hands-on courses relevant to working in the industry e.g. economy, more technical courses etc» (Yes)
- Project psychology that IPM"s take, should be also available to DCPM"s» (Yes)
- Would be good to have a good, understandable course in Matlab, especially for the foreign students that never used Matlab before and are supposed to know it. » (Yes)
- Some course in the connection complex systems - social science!» (Yes)
- Electrical Installations course» (Yes)
- add more elective courses» (Yes)
- Some of the compulsory courses in the first year are overlapping a lot.» (Yes)
- Pharmaceutics, Pharmacology. some related to pharmacy. As most of the companies preferring related to Pharma named courses as if i know.» (Yes)
- Courses with environmental engineering» (Yes)
- Drawing in 3D and AutoCad» (Yes)
- Design of substations.Design of HVDC ,wind power plants inter connected grids.» (Yes)
- Matlab» (Yes)
- Wireless and adhoc also Network on chip,,,Although there is a course called"Wireless and sensor networks but I think we could learn more about these concepts in this course or in another course. » (Yes)
- They are working on it.» (Yes)
- MATLAB - Teach some basics and give assignments to practice. Students coming from outside Europe are not much familiar about MATLAB. So, it would be great to learn MATLAB.» (Yes)
- More continuation courses. For example in the fiealds of combustion egineering or industrial energy systems. » (Yes)
- an introductory course on electronics» (Yes)
- Electronic, mechatronics» (Yes)
- More economics» (Yes)
- Power system protection and Power system Reliability and to make a sustainable course with only Electric power students, the one we have now is a not hard enough considering our educational level. » (Yes)
- Course about Agile Manufacturing, Change Management and Risk Management (in terms of business)» (Yes)
- A lilte more technical coruses would not hurt. » (Yes)
- cleaner production» (Yes)
- Game theory, Statistical inference» (Yes)
- All the lessons chosen for the programme very good but structure of the programme does not let students to specialize in a particular area.We learn many subjects but cannot be profecient in any of them. So it would be better for coming years to make more certain focus areas. » (Yes)
- RF Integrated Circuit Design Analog Integrated Circuit Design Signal Processing Digital Filters » (Yes)
- I don"t find it enough specialized for a master degree level. There could have been more elective courses on different subjects. » (Yes)
- Something related to the context, the issues, the strategy of the different automotive actors, something that is not technical.» (Yes)
- Electric Drives 3 should be added in the program which focus is all on the Permanent magnet motor (PM motor) designing with more advance practical lab work. Because the near future is the PM motor. » (Yes)
- should add some course about biomaterials.» (Yes)
- Transformers» (Yes)
- Work in 3D-programs such as Revit» (Yes)
- Computational Fluid Dynamics» (Yes)
- Perhaps a course about international relations or something somewhat similar » (Yes)
- More industrial and technical courses.» (Yes)
- More transport phenomena» (Yes)
- There must me a strong course related to object oriented programming» (Yes)
- Sketching technique or similar course.» (Yes)
- An introduction to Mat-Lab course can be added since i feel its very difficult when undergoing some courses which intensively requires some basic programming language» (Yes)
- The DCPM program is very oriented towards the production phase of construction. It does however only address the design phase to a very small extent. Not everyone (in fact very few in my experience) would like to be production managers (arbetsledare och platschefer). The program should address the design ohase to prepare the students for design project management including procurement strategies, deisgn project handling and management etc. Furthermore, the program educates students for the industry, but is very theoretical/academic in its approach which could be a good thing if complemented by practical tools and approaches. This is not the case presently, and most courses address organizational theory rather than preparing students for industrial practice and improvements. Organizational theory does not constitute a proper base for working in the construction industry, if not supplemented by practical tools and techniques (e.g. why not teach the improtance and how to write protocols and incorporate this into the group assigments as in Christine Räisänen"s course). Neither does the program offer a variety of courses in design and construction management, as everything is production oriented. Property and real estate is very much an industry that requires the skills possessed by students in DCPM and this ought to be attributed in the structure of the education. Especially so as many students are interested in this area. » (Yes)
- "Power system Protection" course should definitely be included in the program.» (Yes)
- More direction related courses to choose, for example automotive design direction can have more options for that direction» (Yes)
- Economics, since the programme only have one optional course i.e. Real Estate finance and economics.» (Yes)
- Vehicle chassies, structure and wheel suspension design and mechanics. Also a Powertrain mechanics Advanced course. The industry requests engineers that has some experience with a specific software, this could be incorporated into the courses in a larger extent.» (Yes)
- Wireless Communication, wireless Networks» (Yes)
- Maybe some Engineering Course in the second period of the first year. As a previous Teknisk Fysik student, reading only the two courses Introduction to Optimisation and Fundamentals of Probability does not feel like full time studies. (Both are good courses though)» (Yes)
- Project Management» (Yes)
- Something like the orginazational behaviour course.» (Yes)
- economy» (Yes)
- I would suggest to add some courses on power generation» (Yes)
- Maybe more microbiology courses» (Yes)
- I.e. courses to enhance our presentation skills, and organizational psychology» (Yes)
- Mobile Communications» (Yes)
- optimization and more math courses» (Yes)
- Financial evaluation of new businesses Market analysis related courses» (Yes)
- Protection of the power systems» (Yes)
- Mobile Computing, Information Visualization Usability Engineering, Graphic Design » (Yes)
- Scientific visualization/computing.» (Yes)
- That the teacher upload the pp presentation for the class at least 1 day before so we can read it and be prepared for the class. There was an occasion that students were sent to discuss a questionary at 9:00 oclock to 12:00 (and then take lunch to 13:00) which we are suppose to discuss by email but only because the techare haven"t finished his pp presentation.» (Yes)
- research based courses» (Yes)
- Design and construction project management should also include courses related with scheduling and activity break down softwares to equip students with the knowledge of the practical world» (Yes)
- project management should be given in both levels, advanced and first level. It created understanding problems while we learn the advance level with out knowing the first level. There were lots of studnets complained this course.» (Yes)
- It will be good if structural design of brigde is included in the program.» (Yes)
- something about struture, sustainable design method including city planning and buildings» (Yes)
- To little real connection to the real world, we need more hands-on experience. Also, a law and contract course would perhaps be valuable» (Yes)
- A visit course. Every lecture would be a different visit or video presenting how is the production of many different products and strategies for services.» (Yes)
- It is highly useful if we could have "course projects" in our program. It is a common practice to strenghten the ability for research by defining project type courses. In this case, the student can work on a project in relate with his/her interest rather than to pass the courses which are optional and can be non related to the student interest.» (Yes)
- We had a course called Nordic architecture, I think it would be great to have a course like world architecture or an express architecture history and theory also. » (Yes)
- HMI» (Yes)
- Some social and economy related courses» (Yes)
- Optimization» (Yes)
- After working part time in industry for the last year, I think a course in software engineering (or similar, wrt hardware) should be a necessity for all students graduating from computer science programs: Learning about different development processes, waterfall, agile, sprint etc.» (Yes)
- * compilers for functional languages * more theory on datastructures» (Yes)
- Marketing» (Yes)
- Marketing and sales skills.» (Yes)
- Sellling» (Yes)
- How to find suppliers and manufacturers, now we only know the technology but not where to find it. Also a brief introduction on self-employment and the skills needed for it.» (Yes)
- the courses are just theoretical,and not practical» (Yes)
- C and C++ programming» (Yes)
- Applied control strategies, Engine management systems. » (Yes)
- Reglerteknik» (Yes)
- A course that focuses on bridge building.» (Yes)
- I believe the program seemed more multidisciplinary when I read about it. But in practice 90% of the students, teachers and projects are Architectural» (Yes)
- you need to add courses that deal with engine management and CAN communication. This area is really important to have knowledge about, and it is barely even mentioned within the mandatory courses. With this added the program would be much better and prepare one better for the automotive industry.» (Yes)
- Specific Bridge/House course» (Yes)
- More courses about advanced building physics and building service systems. » (Yes)
- Structural mechanics and applied FEM. I dont know why these are not included as mandatory.It is impossible to get a job in todays industry without these» (Yes)
- Mobile computing Human-computer interaction» (Yes)
- pharmaceutical bioinformatics» (Yes)
- courses in entrepreneurship» (Yes)
- some more design course» (Yes)
- Soil and Water pollution» (Yes)
- Specific course on passive housing and specific course on renewable energy integration in buildings (for both, product information, calculations, design).» (Yes)
- subjects related to body structure, vehicle integration. Also, simulations for strength and vibrations» (Yes)
- manufacturing» (Yes)
- More finance, » (Yes)
- An industrial approach should encompase topics related to applied electronics technology and more detailed course on polymer technology» (Yes)
- More technical courses. it was to many fuzzy courses.» (Yes)
- market and brand connection» (Yes)
- En kurs i Energieffektivisering för industriell verksamhet. Kurserna Lean production samt Quality management täcker att använda resurser effektivt, en kurs i energieffektivisering täcker att använda energi effektivt. Superviktigt i dessa tider med växthuseffekt, idiotiskt kärnkraftsmotstånd samt skenande oljepriser. Energi kommer bli dyrare i framtiden.» (Yes)
- I would like to have more courses regarding making prototype and have chances to learn different materials by actually working with them. » (Yes)
- Some courses about hydraulic such as Advanced Hydraulic or Hydrodynamic» (Yes)
- Project Management IBB135» (Yes)
- Introduction to the computer programmes can be a non-exam course. Especially, knowledge about Matlab can be a big part of this course.» (Yes)
- A course in test-driven development I felt had been beneficial, or a general course in software testing.» (Yes)
- Courses more related to product design peocess and having more practice than theories» (Yes)
- Constraint Programming» (Yes)
- Some course that connects CAD and FEM so you get a bigger picture of what you"r calculations are on. Maybe a course that connects more to the industry, visit?» (Yes)
- Creativity!!!» (Yes)
- More management courses to choose from in LP 1, 2 for the second year. » (Yes)
- Power Protection» (Yes)
- Power system protection» (Yes)
- A course in lean » (Yes)
- There are to little difference between the different tracks. For example I think that for ehealth track there should be less courses in imaging and more oriented towards computer science and how to deal with regulations. A good course to have in the program is DAT230 Requirements Engineering. This course could be good for all tracks.» (Yes)
- There was one course that Supply chain took about lean production, I think that one should be included in QOM» (Yes)
- English guidence maybe? Where you can take a diagnostic test in the beginning of the master programme and one at the end. should not take up to much time but maybe some lectures per period. should be towarsd technical english and writing projects in english(we have a lot of those). a tool rather than a course» (Yes)
- A more experimental course» (Yes)
- A course on MATLAb in the first study period of the program would be better.» (Yes)
- cryptography» (Yes)
- more about nanomaterials» (Yes)
- -Wireless communication » (Yes)
- project management» (Yes)
- Some courses related to thermodynamics.» (Yes)
- The program should contain some subjects for advanced programming. Most of the course stuff is regarding engineering and designing of softwares and very less about technology stuff and programming.» (Yes)
- More advanced course on compiler backends. More in-depth course on algorithm analysis (recurrence relations, think Concrete Mathematics)» (Yes)
- Planning» (Yes)
- basic corporate finance, supply chain management and sourcing» (Yes)
- SCM related to business strategies/business models. » (Yes)
- More fem, cfd or material (engine, brakediscs perhaps covered in bachelor)» (Yes)
- TEK230 - Lean Production. By looking at the course"s homepage, I think that the course has much to do with a QOM program. But it hardly shows some interest on the QOM side. I meant, "Why this Course is not in the Recommended Elective list for the QOM program?". The Course seem to be available only for the Sp4 every year. If you look at the QOM Schedule, in Year1 Sp4 - Six Sigma Project and in Year2 Sp4 - Master Thesis will be on progress. Which makes us very uncomfortable to take this course during these terms. My point is, as many QOM thesis and of course many companies seek students who have some knowledge on areas dealing with Lean and Six Sigma, this Course must be available (Sp1 or Sp2) also. The course name is TEK230 - Lean Production and the Course Examiner is Carl Wänström. I tried mailing this to my Course co-ordinator(Mr. Torbjörn Jacobsson). But I was disappointed hearing that it is not possible to include that now. But I thought, though we(MPQOM 2010) are not benefited from it, at least my juniors(MPQOM 2011) would be benefited from it.» (Yes)
- Something where you do an individual project. You always work in groups and don"t learn the confidence of doing something on your own. » (Yes)
- I would like more collaboration between the programe "structural engineering" and "geo and water"» (Yes)
- More focus on larger organisation and not only on entrepreuners.» (Yes)
- More Protection courses » (Yes)
- Economics, supply chain management» (Yes)
- Renewables» (Yes)
- A second course in Simulation of Complex Systems» (Yes)
- Polymer Electronics (I dont know the exact code but its taught in Chemistry department)» (Yes)
- splitting of courses:- Astrophysics and Earth science, Electromagnetic and Spectroscopy » (Yes)
- automotive principles, Engineering design» (Yes)
- More design courses about aesthetics and form design.» (Yes)
- there was a lot of simularities between some courses» (Yes)
- Architecture theory and history study visit of construction site» (Yes)
- Soil and water treatments more in depth. Environmental laws, ISO standards» (Yes)
- Something more "hands on" that is not an advanced research tool. This will make me more prepared for real life.» (Yes)
- History of (Interaction) Design» (Yes)
- In general there are not enough choices for elective courses to take.» (Yes)
- "New product Development"=How to create a business arround an idea IP protection=How/Why/When to protect your ideas.» (Yes)
- Interior arcitecture» (Yes)
- programming language» (Yes)
- Rock and Soil Mechanics, Advanced pavement and railway design, Finite element tools/softwares of rock and soil engineering.» (Yes)
- More structural engineering courses early in the program instead of the courses in the autumn (structural systems, materials performance, heat and moisture). These courses are very badly performed, the teachers are downright bad and projects are not good for masters level, atleast not if you aim towards becoming a structural engineer or proceeding in research within the subject. Instead perhaps some more courses in solid and structural mechanics, beam and plate theory and strength of materials courses.» (Yes)
- For my master programme, i would like to have more sustainable design and passive house courses in the curriculum.» (Yes)
- I have read Networks and Distributed Systems. The new master programme Computer Systems and Networks seems to have a programme plan that suites me better.» (Yes)
- Finance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! preferably 15 P that have bot hwith business fiance but also more an entrprenurial and investment focus. And also leadership» (Yes)
- Latest techniques in web development» (Yes)
- The programme is generally to broad. I"d have liked to have the option of more specialized courses within each area of the programme.» (Yes)
- Genetic engineering» (Yes)
- -Project course in product development (food/medicine) -Communication and presentation techinque» (Yes)
- Though many of them are already added with the new layout. » (Yes)
- thermodynamics-energy issues» (Yes)
- iPhone-app programming» (Yes)
- More leadership courses, there are non at the moment. There should at least be one.» (Yes)
- Material handling and production flow compulsory. Add freight transport systems and management of physical distribution together and increase the level of them while maintaining the combinded course 7,5 credit. Add a course in simulation and one Excel/data handling course. We are totally unable to handle the information required to make descisions upon the managerial theory we aquired. » (Yes)
- compulsory swedish course» (Yes)
- A purer purchasing course» (Yes)
- more construction» (Yes)
- I think the program involves to much courses related to physical transportation especially the Freight transport and Management of Physical distribution courses are similar. I think that a course devoted to purchasing should be mandatory, not the elective purchasing course which mainly teaches the difficulties of co-writing a book.» (Yes)
- More courses that are focused on practical improvement of production on a general basis.» (Yes)
- something related to distributed system, grid computing» (Yes)
- More game related course. For example a course where people learn about classic game, there game mechanic, narrative etc and why they become big to understand how we today can make good games. Many people are lacking the understanding of "good games"» (Yes)
- Where is any good elective courses period one, totaly not intressting» (Yes)
- Java» (Yes)
- shell structures, earthquake design, wind design, high rise towers, advanced bridge engineering » (Yes)
- Laboratory Fundamentals in Biological Engineering Introuction to medical imaging Radiation physics and instrumentation » (Yes)
- Earthquake Engineering» (Yes)
- Web development» (Yes)
- 1. Nanotechnology for sustainable energy -TIF165 2. Biotechnical physics -TIF040 » (Yes)
- modeling and simulation» (Yes)
- A wider range of courses to choose from» (Yes)
- convex optimization» (Yes)
- Maybe a little bit more about sales.» (Yes)
- auto-cad, drawing» (Yes)
- Hard to define, but I think it would be good to try to achieve a stronger focus on what kind of competence the student should have after attending the masters program.» (Yes)
- The teacher"s knowledge of english is sometimes really, really bad, like a 6-year old. That makes the education on the same level.» (Yes)
- More training in Sales, and I mean trainingm not a theoretical course.» (Yes)
- Earthquake engineering» (Yes)
- Standards Course in English» (Yes)
- I would like to add quite a few courses since the focus is on business and management Corporate Finance Human Resource Management Market Research Operations Research Accounting- managerial or financial » (Yes)
- More finance» (Yes)
- "Organizational behavior" should be mandatory. Love it! » (Yes)
- maybe more about renewable energy production» (Yes)
- A bigger project course, for example during the hole spring in year 4. Will probably give the students a deeper understanding of problems in advanced applied mechanics. » (Yes)
- Maybe a course about design patterns?» (Yes)
- more advanced and specific courses+simulation software» (Yes)
- I think ,in this program same as Wireless students that they have microwave project courses,we should have the same couse that just be project base in one company or Onsala atleast.» (Yes)
- their should More courses related to analog domain, so it would more easy to focus for thesis point of view.» (Yes)
- More ICT.» (Yes)
- Organizational behavior » (Yes)
- There is to few courses to chose from if you want to specify tourself within one subject. More watercourses, more trafic and more geo. All is needed for greater deapth.» (Yes)
- A proper track for those who want to make a transition between disciplines ... Medicine to Engineering or vice verca.» (Yes)
- grund matematik» (Yes)
- More about Management. Optional courses are not so complete and varied.» (Yes)
- More practical work. Take away the MTS course and put in course in patent and a course in how to get a product into the market (could be different depending on master as there is difference in maybe technical products and biomedical products), with info about regulation etc.» (Yes)
- 1. Open innovation 2. barriers to innovation 3. innovation strategy 4. venture capital 5. innovation in public service 6. innovation in finance » (Yes)
- C++ language course and embedded design with C++» (Yes)
- more interaction one free course where you can perform a projhect of your choice» (Yes)
- Financial and economic couses» (Yes)
- More on how to calculate product cost. Could be part of the PD-project running in year one.» (Yes)
- Management» (Yes)
- Automotive Safety, It is spoiled by the weak staff like Johan Davidsson that is providing low quality courses, I cam to Sweden because of Automotive safety, but My idea changed because of bad Safety course.» (Yes)
- Polymer processing, generally more about what kind of work that we could end up with. my problem is that I don"t feel ready for work.» (Yes)
- Programming with DSP processors» (Yes)
- many» (Yes)
- A course in general structural design, maybe in the second year.» (Yes)
- I think lean production should be a must take cause that course is really good.» (Yes)
- Designing of hydrotechnical buildings in AutoCAD» (Yes)
- Density Functional Theory course Transportation Phenomena Course Physical Chemistry(Thermodynamics and Kinetics)» (Yes)
- Operation Resaerch» (Yes)
- Introduction to group theory Advanced group theory Advanced Quantum field theory» (Yes)
- some more geo enigneering courses» (Yes)
- Biomedical Engineering is a multidisciplinary filed. So it would be much better if courses related to the neuroscience are added into the program » (Yes)
- More applied courses, e.g. an applied FE caluclation course, with e.g. real car or truck components» (Yes)
- more courses to teach about progrmming (coding).» (Yes)
- I think our programme can help student to find job after graduation ,specially it is necessary to international student.» (Yes)
- I think that a course in CAD should be elecitve for those ho doesnt have worked with that in the bachelor degree. This would open up more opportunitys on the jobbmarket. » (Yes)
- Measurements techniques, industry tour» (Yes)
- Better information to students about what is going on. At the moment it is not good at all. For example if you come from abroad it is not so clear on how to find stuff. And then also about the schedule, if its made it should not be changed during the termin, exstremely expensive to change flight when you already have booked and payed for one! » (Yes)
- Fundamental Structural Dynamics, Applied structural Dynamics, CFD» (Yes)
- CAD» (Yes)
- Some courses about control and automobile dynamics and such » (Yes)
- More practical tasks» (Yes)
- 1 More courses on sysyem level design. 2 DSP in VHDL » (Yes)
- More practical, more chans of doing real work, visit companys etc.» (Yes)
- cryptography» (Yes)
- can add more course to the interaction design track» (Yes)
- Advanced VHDL.» (Yes)
- contracting negotiation conflicts» (Yes)
- A proper course in project management. The one we have are good to start with, but a follow up to that one would be spot on! With real life expericences and to actually try out what project management means» (Yes)
- more mechnical material approach, hållfathetslära» (Yes)
- Erlang programming while not haskel» (Yes)
- Intellectual capital management» (Yes)
- more hands-on lab experience in the first year would have been nice.» (Yes)
- organisational behavior » (Yes)
- Nanotechnology for sustainable energy» (Yes)
- Advaced course on control theory, offered by chemical engineering department, not mixed with electrical engineering, etc.» (Yes)
- More analytical courses that does not involve Aldo» (Yes)
- International business management - that is more focus on problematic issues connected to multinational firms operation and strategies such as divestments and difficulties in operating in different countries. » (Yes)
- Corporate Finance» (Yes)
- In manufacturing tech specification, some mechanics courses should be added.Like solid mechanics, plastic mechanics and so on.» (Yes)
- simulation softwares like ABAQUS, ANSYS(finite element software)- they are held in other programs so it is hard for someone from another program to follow them because they solve their own problems in these softwares which is related to their majors.» (Yes)
- Perhaps some courses in medicine» (Yes)
- No but set higher demands on almost all of the courses and add more courses or better ones for the elective credits, where many people are taking some courses just because they don´,t have any other choice. Would maybe like to add a course in more strategic product design.» (No)
- But more course related to the master progrmme in the bachelor programe should be implemented.» (No)
- I have none in particular in mind, but variety and several possible choices are always good.» (No)
- But it would be better to have more laboratories to have more experience using the equipment. It is hard to have a good background when you can only use the equipment once or twice.» (No)
- The layout of the programme leaves opportunities to customise among courses, which gives quite some freedom.» (No)
- I hope that the Architectural Conservation and Transformation will remain for coming years» (No)
- I think that the new tracks added to the programme are a very good idea» (No)
- more change management» (No)
- Kunde inte få upp de där målen och inte heller program innehållet därför är det svårt att ha åsikter om det. Har inte heller tid att leta, funkar inte länken så får det tyvärr vara.» (No)
- The link doesnt work on goal and fulfillment. You suck. Never seen the goals.» (No opinion)
- I AM DOING MY MASTER AT CHALMERS, BUT DUE TO ONE YEAR ABROAD I HAVE ONLY TAKEN 2 CHALMERS COURSES DURING THE MASTER PROGRAM, ONE OF WHICH WAS AN MFS COURSE. My master thesis I am writing at a company abroad. This makes it difficult for me to answer many of these questions.» (No opinion)
- I was on exchange during the first year of the program so I can"t really judge this» (No opinion)
- Purchasing maybe, (if it would not overlap)» (No opinion)
- Marketing/sales.» (No opinion)
- no opinion because we are allowed to take course outside our programme even so its not a problem in choosing courses.» (No opinion)
- I have never seen the goals of different tracks.» (No opinion)
- the courses overlap to much. some have really low workload and some quite high. » (No opinion)
- I cannot think of any at the moment.» (No opinion)

22. Are there any courses that you think should be heavily revised (or even removed) from the programme?

Yes (1 to 2)»		597		45%
Yes (3 to 4)»		84		6%
Yes more than 5»		10		0%
No»		407		31%
No opinion»		208		15%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Shorten or combine "Economics of Innovation" and "Research Design and Methods".» (?)
- Managing operations processes Integrated product development Operations improvement project» (?)
- Computer Introduction (removed) Wireless Networks (revised - the level of the course is much lower for a MSc. programme ) Internet Technology (revised - too much programming required given that the MPCOM does not have any suggestions for programming related courses) Multimedia and Video Communications (revised - course level too low) Medicine for the Engineer (removed - I would have preffered to have other courses recommended. I do not find this course suitable for a communictaion engineering masters) » (?)
- Applied Mechatronics» (?)
- It will be good to include courses related to industy oriented applications of biotechnology.(apart from bioreactor course). Courses like biopolymers can be removed. Data acquisition and related lab course can be revised for future students. » (?)
- Dynamical systems, » (?)
- Environmental system analysis Environmental management Assessing sustainability Environmental analysis of water and all the other courseas with environmental stuff » (?)
- Already done for the next year» (?)
- the course design systems 7,5 p demands to much from the students» (?)
- Divide the course space science and technique into more detail courses including system design, reliable control and efficient maintenance. It is better to add one or two courses concerning Earth Science. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymers and biocomposites and Data aquisition and handling in systems biology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise, Materials Selection & Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods. For students who have taken their bachelor on Chalmers this is much repitition.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Advanced CAD course is NOT advanced!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biopolymers to be removed as compulsory course. Biochemical toxicology need to be revised in order to be an ADVANCED course, since it is now very basic. This is also true for a couple of more courses in the programme which should be added some more engineering competencies, preferably the problem solving ability, to be better courses e.g Protein engineering and Drug development.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in society (construction governance, new name 2010)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Strategic management should be revised, especially the lectures were bad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the "Hybrid vehicles and control" course needs some work. The requirements for the exam are too low, and the assignments are too simple. The assignments in "Internal combustion engines advanced" are on a good level, and these should be as well. Especially the control strategies used in the assignments are far from reality. It needs to be demonstrated how these strategies work in a real car, in my opinion.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The synthesis, properties and structures of solid state materials should be removed. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless networks. At least make the course that way that the examination checks if you have learnt anything» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TDA288 Människa - dator interaktion» (Yes (1 to 2))
- classical mechanic and QFT need a new teacher» (Yes (1 to 2))
- In my opinion, Artifical Neural Networks should be made part of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms, it"s currently too much focus on a little-used technique by giving it an entire course. Simulation of Complex Systems is a bad course currently, it should be made either a pure project course or be made more rigid course in e.g. ABM. Right now it"s one of those youtube-courses... There are a lot of things to learn in this field, which the program should address. Computational Biology and Dynamical Systems should be made into a single 15hp course, and should be placed as the first thing you meet in CAS. This is a clear story.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nuclear chemistry KBT105 should be heavily revised, too hard. Binanotechnology for chemists too easy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biorefinarey» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced chemical engineering and process analytical technology should have a larger workload during the study period. As it were this year, the lectures and demoexercises were very basic but the exam were more advanced. The lectures (most of them) and demos didn"t prepare us for the exam and didn"t help us to understand the course material. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- too much of the same information in different courses. Ex. Porter"s 5 forces» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some rearangment» (Yes (1 to 2))
- High Voltage Technology Sustainable Power Production and Transmission» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Sustainable Development and Sustainable energy systems. Make one class of these and focus on questions from SEF 2. ESMP, better organization and structure» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability, Preliminary Plant Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight Transportat Systems, Management of Physical Distribution» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable development » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Internet technology course focused to heavily on learning protocol specific features by heart. The Adv. topics in networks and dist. systems course did not really contain "advanced" topics. They it was formed it would have been more suited as an introductory course to the different subjects.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change is a very badly designed course, the content is good but the course is bad.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1)PLM: The course has more to do with the software to manage the life cycle rather than the Ideas or principles behind them. 2)Applied mechatronics: It requires a strong background in electronics, with is a drawback for mechanical engineering graduates. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production logistics should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Management should not be compulsory and Applied Industrial Ecology should be more practical. The examination is a written exam that only assess if I can memorize some articles.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition and handling in systems biology. Should be optional. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- finance is a course that can be improved» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digital course need to be changed, to the better.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "human centered design" had nothing to do with the description of the classs "advanced design materials" too basic, not advanced at all» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems and computer security should be revised!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the introduction course for MPIES is really heavy work load» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The MTS course is almost completely irrelevant to the education» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t think for example Functional analysis is necessary for all specialisations.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- many courses are very similar, the microscope courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- data acquisitiona and handling in system biology is too wide to be covered in 8weeks,should be divided into two parts» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing developing projects and technological transforamtion need a substantial face lift» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quality and Operations Management, Managing Operations Processes.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Road vehicle aerodynamic is to general and the knowledge has to be found only in the book.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the planned changes to the course in design quality and materials are good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction governance & Knowledge and learning in project organizations» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Mechatronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WAS A COMPLETE DISASTER. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- For Structural Engineering students the Heat and Moisture engineering and Material Performance should not be compulsory courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Soft matter physics and Biological physics should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Molecular electronics (the organisation of the course)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial management should be more practical in term of application in project management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- AI -to much focus on writing reports not enough AI» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Strategic Environmental Analysis The construct of the course is confusing. There are many aspects and the connection or function of these aspects are not clear enough.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- some of the mandatory courses seemed ineccesary. Like biopolymers course and bioreactors course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Systems should be revised, to better supply a platform for system design within the field of achitecture. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Did not feel like I learned too much in some courses. there should be done changes in Organisational Project Management and Strategic Project Management.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There should be some more demands in terms of prerequisit courses for some specialization courses to make the courses be able to move faster to the real issue of the course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Neural networks - Dynamical systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The compulsory courses should fit better with the chosen track. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Real-time control Mechatronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Artificial intelligence, the ML part must be assigned a better lecturer. Its grading system must be made easier to understand.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- customer relationship course seems to be duplication of previous courses, should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I feel the imaging courses can be revised and improved. (2 mandatory courses seems a bit too much).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Diggital control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials selection and design.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ELDO and NVF» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computational Biology A should be an elective course. Some of the mathematical content could be included in Dynamical Systems instead. Simulation of Complex Systems should if possible be revised so that all of the theory is taught before one has to start working on a project (similarly to the structure of the Autonomous agents course).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- to many water courses and chemistry is to advanced» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Managing organizations in the construction industry" must be revised. It is far too heavy for 7.5 credits.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- there could be slightly more structure in Heat and Moisture Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight Transport System & Management of Physical Distribution, both courses where not deep enough. And the most important is the understanding and not specific knowledges.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source coding, multimedia and video communication» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There should be more time for the studio and less time for other courses. The courses Design systems and Nordic architecture were a dissapoinment but sustainable developmen were very good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I found the Image analysing very hard to get and I think its better do make the Image processing course mandatory instead and the Image analyses eligible. Sadly the Image processing were already full so I wasn"t able to take it» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Rigid body dynamics should be changed, the assignment was too large. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- manufacturing strategy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structural Bioinformatics and Sequence Bioinformatics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Image analysis should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The economics course we do in the fall of the second year is terrible. Very low level.. gets boring and everyone fails it becuse of that. The teacher can"t hardly speak english. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Random Processes is an excellent and important course, yet the style of teaching was far from most students" understanding level. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Leadership and Quality management should be changed. Maybe Advanced software Architecting should be taken a look at. I guess the responsibles are aware that these courses has some issues.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed systems (TDA596), should be more like Distributed systems, advanced course (TDA297) which should be "more advanced".» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- When I took the course "Real-time control systems" there were a lot of repetition. I think this has been changed however.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Especially, Ship Motion and Wave Induced Loads» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing Organizations in the Construction Industry (should be revised and lightened) Project Management(mentor-ship and teaching)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the latter of the compulsory courses are too abstract for courses held at a technical university. I would like an aproach that links the courses more with technical problems and engineering.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Safety courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project course at Semester two is not as useful as supposed to be. It is mostly useful for bachelor rather than master. Although, working as a team seems interesting, the gain is much less than expected. Usually, one or two students out of six people in the group are working and this is a damage for the others. The point is, the goal of the project course could be highly obtained in master thesis, if the student wants to follow that area. This period can be covered by courses from the other programs based on students favorite. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Response to Sound and Vibration could be more in depth, and/or tied in with some room acoustics topics as well (eg. perception to sound in a room).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise: Heat and Moisture Engineering, Indoor Climate and HVAC Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition and handling in systems biology, could use some revising. I felt it gave a good overview of the area, but we didn"t actually learn how to use it. Also to easy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- If the teacher don"t listen to the course evaluatioon and has to much to do remove him from teaching since the students will not learn any thing from him anyway. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geotechics should be heavily revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I see no point in AI being obligatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The sketching courses should revised and adapted for the different purposes that sketches are made.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ELDO and VEF.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CFD too extensive Multi Variable component should not be compulsary MPISC» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Architecture, Algorithms» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Design Engineering (the course).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Much much less power points for the power system courses. 100+ power point slides in a 1,5 hour lecture isn"t helping anyone.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The old software architectures, I think it"s gone now.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PLM and Advanced material selection» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Industrial Ecology should be revised - leave out the exam and go full on hand-ins and projects. Environmental management needs a revision of the course content as well as the management of the course. The literature was scarce and the teaching very confusing and poorly organised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I was not happy with the physical distribution and transport systems course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MCC090 should not be obligatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave projects - the part about project management should be taught by someone with that competence.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The topics in Simulation of complex systems should be expanded» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I believe that sustainable building should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer security doesn"t add very much and shouldn"t be compulsory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Discrete Event Systems, it contains to little.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave Projects I and Microwave Projects II» (Yes (1 to 2))
- material selection and design should be merged with some other course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems (elective course). It was too much Computer Science and the course structure was not so good if you are used to learn through problem solving. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing physical distribution Freight transport system» (Yes (1 to 2))
- discrete event systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Given the new plan, I think one should seriously consider the workload in period 1 as both the Quantum Mechanics course and Experimental Physics are very time-consuming.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think unix a little bit too theoretical» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think Interaction Design Methodology and Method of Interaction Analysis are quite similar and it"s not necessary to have both courses for the program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Powertrain Mechanics, which should be more focused on design, optimization and why not, maintenance of conventional powertrain (not hybrids).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Complex System Seminars» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mpdcs is discontinued, so no use...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The lectures in the course Applied Mechatronics did not really meet the standards in my opinion. However, I believe it has already been revised since I took the course in the study year 2008/2009. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Signals and Systems to be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy Systems Modeling and Planning should be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture, material performance. They are too similar to courses in the bachelor (at chalmers)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managing operations processes, and to some extent the Six Sigma Black Belt course (The projects in the SixSigma project should be clearly specified from the begining, some lectures should be optional for the students)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Real Time Control Systems should be heavily revised or removed. Discrete event control and optimization shouldn"t be compulsorary for control specialization.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat & Moisture engineering must be shortened down, it"s good to know about common moisture problems but then the course gets to divided into different subjects with different teachers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Definitely PPD should be changed to a large extent. The expectation from the course was high however, the course coordinator, I am sorry to say it, had made the course simply useless. I expected it to explain the basics in Plant design, however it was mostly pressing buttons in HYSYS. In its current state is a total waste of a term.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of Environmental Change - revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CAD handled by lars. Needs the revision of the content.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There is a lot of courses covering the same things, for example modelling and problem solving, environmental systems analysis, risk-courses. Seems unnecessary. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- same as before, the courses that repeat what we already studied the previous year at chalmers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Engineering Mathematics should not be obligatory for foreign students. It is a waste of time for master level.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The CAD course must be improved.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- foundations of probability» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Enengy systems modelling and planning Sustainable development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The collaborations with GU have very large problems with schedule and information between the the universities. And work load. It is not ok that in every course GU students get 15credits, while we get 7,5credits. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmentaly Adapted Product Developement and Manufacturing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- i.composites and nanocomposite ii.material selection in mechanical design should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- TIN171 Artificial intelligence, needs to be heavily revised since the course schedule seem not at all thought trough. Extremely small time frame between major deadlines.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- But there has already been some changes since I started the program, and that changes might have been sufficient.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the courses in quarter 6 is not so useful» (Yes (1 to 2))
- -Environmental system analysis -Modelling and problem solving in Civil Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- operation management course. I think that some software studies should also be added to Project Management course. I know that it has strong managerial focus but learning the project management software is also needed after all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Classical Physics as well as Quantum field theory. The latter is good, but a maths course beforehand would make it more clear.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maritime leadership. And some new courses can be added. Electives don"t a wide range of choice. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Design Systems Course in the spring semester should not run parallel with the studio, since it took a lot of time from the studio work. Also there should be another course for the Swedish students to choose from then just "Nordic Architecture" in the fall, since that course didn"t give us so much new knowledge.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- e-Healt» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HCD should be heavily revised, as well as Graphical Interfaces.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth, Diagnostic Imaging» (Yes (1 to 2))
- In the Project Management course, the exam should be removed and replaced with one project where you learn the skills mentioned in the outcomes» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model driven Development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Computational Electromagnetics (Remove) Sustainable Power Production and Transportation (Improve)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Six Sigma black belt course isn"t very good. The entire experience of the course is decided by a lottery at the start of the course where your project is determined.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The AI course is the absolute worst course I"ve taken on Chalmers (and I"ve taken a few). It has no clear goals, no structure, a joke of an examination form and the learning opportunities are minimal. Please make this course a regular course instead of one where you only get insight into a tiny fraction of the field.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biophysical chemsitry.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- For example in Powertrain track - Courses related to fuel injection equipment, ECU communication softwares should be incorporated» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy Systems Modelling and Planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Susteainable development and sustainable energy futures to one course. Review energy systems modelling and planning which has large potential, but is not so popular. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction governance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Power production and transportation, separate it for the Electric Power students!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied induatrial ecology should be heavily revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- pollution prevention , the level is very low» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the course Digital and multivariate control should not be ámong mandatory courses although it is a good course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle dynamics » (Yes (1 to 2))
- ENM095 Sustainable power production and transportation should be revised with more focus on labs work » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Microwave Engineering Projects» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Artificial intelligence needs to focus less on planning and report writing, and more on the subject itself. Maybe the course could be optional?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source Coding Wireless Network» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bio-reactors - Design and Control should be revised since International Students were not aware of the Mat Lab programming but can be given additional coaching.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Unfortunately, several (mainly) PhD students that have been lecturing are clearly inappropriate when it comes to teaching in general (e.g. Vahid in the course of Management of physical distribution - I believe there are more specific opinions regarding this in the concerned course evaluation). I think that the examiners should take a bigger responsibility in ensuring the quality of the lectures by assisting the PhDs in planning the lecturing, for instance. Also, a vast share of the examinations (i.e. share of efforts allocated from students) are group assignments. The work are however seldom given sufficient feedback from examiners, but often rather only a quantitative assessment without any explicit feedback - which is inappropriate since the students most often put a lot of effort into these assignments. If the examiners do not have time for making a sufficient assessment of the work, they should maybe consider other examination alternatives.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ehealth has too broad view.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data acquisition and Data handling in systems biology, Bio-polymers and Bio-composites.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The CAD course needs to be revisited» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research design and methods. One of the most meaningsless courses I"ve ever taken. If you want to continue with doctorial studies, then it MAY be useful.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- High voltage engineering and design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- multimedia communications» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technological change and industrial transformation Economic of innovation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centered Design could include application of proper usability testing (such as using the usability labs) and user test methods. It is only about the process right now which is I believe too shallow. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Simulation of complex system Complex System Seminiar» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maritime Leadership and Shipping and Marine Environment» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model driven engineering - shoudl be heavlily revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- environmental management borde kunna göras bättre. det är ju ett viktigt ämne. tyvärr behandlar lärarna studenterna mer som barn än som vuxna och det gjorde hela kursen märklig. väldigt dålig insyn i kursupplägg, tentor och allt annat som man brukar ha tillgång till. trångsynt...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- less projects in LP4 year 1» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Interaction Design Project need more dedicated tutors that actually seem to care» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The most courses overlap to heavily. The TEK190 Research Design and Methods could be better executed because it is really important!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Arne Dahlberg is no good lecturer. The exam in computer security didn"t cover the main topics.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic in Computer Science is not a master level course and I think it should be removed from the curriculum. Cryptography needs to be heavily revised especially the method the exam is given such as bringing asking the same question as the home exam in the final exam and assigning 14/60 points to that question. It should be possible to take elective courses in the IT university as well as other departments and the administrative issues behind this process should be removed. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Risk management was not well organised, Although the content is really important for job career. The course is not organised for a master level.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- kkr072 (rename! easy to mix upp with MEN072) to much cemestry formekanikal engineers. sustainable development FFR160 feels just like som defuse lump of information thet is korrekted after personal arbitrariness.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Lumsten courses could be one. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Processes & Management course is really bad, it is not really design management related» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MTF072 CFD. CFD and turbulence should be separated.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in Science of environmental change need to be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- More crossfunctional projects please» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses offered by the institution of applied mechanics don"t, in general, have as high quality.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Leadership in the Architectural Professions. At least... change the name to Preparation for Master Thesis or something. And It SHOULD NOT be mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Perhaps Structural systems for the students that would like to study more about building physics. Or some of the acoustic courses » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Indroduction to safety? Cant comprehend as to why thise mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software leadership and quality management is a interesting topic, but the course need to be improved.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability could be more focused to chemical engineers. Now anyone can take it which makes the level basic.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental System Analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ACED-PAT need some reworking. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would revised economy in order to give more applicable way than now. Claasification the same.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmantally Adopted Product Development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT110--Methods for electronic system design and verification» (Yes (1 to 2))
- i think advanced sketching needs to be improved.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Environmental Analysis of Water. This course (which have a very difficult schedule such as study fields, laboratory experiments and so on) has a strange system of grading at the end. There are 3 project grades and a presentation grade but at the end the teacher said that like you will give 4 if all of your grades are more than that. i have 3-, 4+, 4+,4 and they give me 3 at the end which is defiantly unfair, and the course doesn"t have a re-exam. If they have such a strange system of grading they should tell it at the begging of the course and not at the end. I"m so unhappy with this course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quality Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of Environmental Change, not removed but revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software architecture - Maybe more focus on "standard" design templates and good practices. Distrtibuted systems - Less focus on specific implementations. It felt "old".» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Rigid Body Dynamics, project should look more to the wanted outcomes for the course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless Networks Multimedia» (Yes (1 to 2))
- risk management and safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Knowledge-based business development. However, I think it was already changed to this year.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- data acquisition should be revised,because it"s important course in the field.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I feel the course, "Computations in mechanics" given in the first study period, should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy modelling and planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MEN115 should be revised. Interesting subject but badly executed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Suburbs» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The methodology course is too demanding.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Artificial Intelligence course is a complete disaster. The TAs seem very confused and change the rules all the time. There is to much report writing and to little actual AI.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Source Coding is unnecessary as a 7.5 credit course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Re-construct the course overlaps in the distribution/transportation courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The conservation and transformation course needs to be better structured. Sustainable building studio needs to be more learning and less free research.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I prefer there must be more electives to chose from. Since we are only allowed to take four electives in our whole program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course called computation in mechanics. This course is not a proper chose for newly -accepted student since it is need some background in FEM and many international student have not passed this course before.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The sustainable course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial management course needs revision. also courses at northumbria university have sometimes similar contents as at chalmers. like the project management course. there should be more coordination between chalmers and northumbria courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable development» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computational biology 1» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Energy systems modelling and planning, I do not really see the point of it. To many to short assignments, so I learn nothing. Less but bigger assignments is needed. Or just take the course away.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- microwave project part 1.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think material selection was not good enough » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise the Human Factors Course, the content seem to be a little bit too small. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maybe science of environmental change can be removed and replaced by another more relevant course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- all chemistry courses, i.e. Nuclear Chemistry and Applied Nuclear Chemistry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental management, Applied IE» (Yes (1 to 2))
- All game courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Urban Architecture Design Laboratory may be a fine course for some people, but it uses such a unique teaching philosophy it needs to be more clear to students before starting. Secondly, the course Design Processes and Management had several portions which were too elementary for master"s students. For me with some working experience, nearly the whole course was too elementary.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material Selection and Design=More design related info!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- modelling and simulation, the content of the course is very important, but the lectures were very bad. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Reserach by design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental system analysis,, » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structure and administration of courses weak in some cases. Content is generally very good!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think "Research by Design" was not a very sufficient course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to engineering mathematics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems (first course), the teacher is a good fella but a terrible teacher. Seems like he has a lot to say about the course plan also. A new fresh layout of that course and a more pedagogic teacher are needed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- advanced ICM - located at the the third semester knowledge based business development » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Leadership and Quality Management - bad teacher, see course evaluations Advanced software architecting - Would rather learn about software systems (and software architecture design patterns (e.g. Martin Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, http://martinfowler.com/books.html)) than real-time systems which it currently is focused on.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Biopolyers and biocomposites" "Materials in medicin"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technical Acoustics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- But this specific course has already been removed for future years» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The EoI course included too much material to read, it was a very stressful course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming Paradigm» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Centered Design, has problems with the examination form because it does not test the contents of the course. And also the lecturer has problems with the english spoken language which makes it difficult to understand her. :(» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Software Architecting Software Leadership and Quality Assurance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical distribution and freight transport are very linked and it feels like we"ve seen twice the same thing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Six sigma and operations improvement. They were both unstructured and hard to learn when I took them (2010)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Add freight transport systems and management of physical distribution together and increase the level of them while maintaining the combinded course 7,5 credit. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight transports systems and Management of physical distrubution are to simular» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental course, should remove a chapter about green house effect» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Not really the courses as they are, more the content and some of the teachers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- theory and methodology That is mostly repetition and therefore extremely boring» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Management of Physical distribution and Freight transport should be combined.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Discrete event & control optimization.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- programming paradigm should be removed. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Interaction Design Methodology. It is the worst course I have ever taken.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IDM the method course I think we instead should more explicit train on the methods. For example I know now their is a method called Interview... but how to use it correctly I dont.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wireless Network» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Interaction Design Methodology, at least it should be redesigned for students who are participating in the game design track. Now it is probably designed for the interaction design track.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- This have been done for 2011» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Systems Research by design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building in Society, Managing Organisations in the construction industry.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Software leadership and quality" was not good. The topics were way too abstract and the discussions in the class were totally irrelevant and not interesting at all. However, I feel that there should be a course about software leadership. Maybe it should include more complex examples from the industry. The course "Advanced Software Architecture" was the worse ever. And that is not because of Jörgen was sick 70% of the time but the administration and the context of the course was so bad. I didn"t learn anything about software architecture. Instead I learned how to connect four sensor to a system with data connections - that"s it. And then the administration. Now, after we have written the exam and done the project, the examinator tells us that the project is only graded pass/fail and that the grade from the exam is the final grade. We were told that the final grade was the math.floor(exam grade, project grade). Jörgen actually told us that in the first lecture. This was really unprofessional done.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- image analysis should be revised » (Yes (1 to 2))
- heat and moist engineering, no structure what so ever» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Bioreactors - Design and control should be revised. International students have difficulties in using MATLAB » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The VEF course should definately get another teacher! The ELDO course has to be more in correlation with what we actually do in this education. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Electric Drives II» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Operations Strategy » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fundamental of microsystem and microsystem technology courses are almost the same course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Freight Transportation and Management of Physical Distribution, bad pedagogic skill from main male teachers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- environmental management is a very interesting topic but the course was one of the worst during my time on Chalmers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced chemical engineering and process analytical technology » (Yes (1 to 2))
- MMA145 "Ship motions and wave induced loads". This course was either too difficult or, which I believe to be the reason, a teacher that lacks the ability to explain in an understandable way. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- computer sec, retarded exam» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Artificial Intelligence should indeed be revised or removed as mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computations in Mechanics (but i think it is revised already).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Technology change» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied mechatronics and robots and robotic systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Rather than heavily revised, one idea could be to emphasize why it is important. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Rigid body dynamics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- No one understood the point of the course Model and problem solving which is mandatory. Even in week seven we didn"t know what the course was all about.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Requirement engineering Software architectur (lectures)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Security was in my opinion not very good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- material selections and design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Artificiall Intelligence is worthless. It should be removed. Otherwise I like the courses so far» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The MTS course or do something with the courses because they are not good at all!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- This program has a very high amount of labwork which is very time consuming, are part of the examination and you are offered little to no help.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Strategic management and economics of intellectual property 2. Intellectual Property and Innovation Strategies - TEK350 - 3. Idea Evaluation and Feasibility Studies» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Electronic System Design Data Conversion Techniques» (Yes (1 to 2))
- FFR166 Science of environmental change, this one should be changed. To be more pedagogic and a better coarse literature.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quantum course should be more conceptually taught» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability» (Yes (1 to 2))
- sustainable building 1 var totalt oorganiserad och vi lärde oss nästan ingenting, mkt beroende på vår lärares dåliga upplägg. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Safety courses, specially the one provided by Johan Davidsson. Malin, the coordiantor of the program never has time for the students» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mat. Selection and Design, it is the worst curse ever!!!!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Digital Circuit Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- advanced chemical engineering and process analytikal technologies is not very advanced, more like repetition and the PAT part is very small in terms of lectures.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Customer Relationship course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- operations strategy should be revised, more lectures! Six Sigma course as well, the classes should be more interesting..its not easy to concentrate two days in a row 9-17! the classes shouldnt be compulsory eigther» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Acedpat and AST should be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- vehicle dynamics, Safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t see why Artificial Intelligence needs to be mandatory. But it is a good course, of course :).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Failure analysis Seminconductor materials and physics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Molecular Electronics: revise course organisation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- E-health is a mandatory course , I think it is better for the students to have it as an option. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material mechanics. Course is needed, but needs a makeover.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project course could be a bit clearer» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Mechatronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Image Analysis, should still be in the program but needs to be more inspiring.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maritime Leadership, should be re-evaluated & Human Factos is an excellent course but I think that it should not be mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to automotive engineering and somewhat Vehicle and traffic safety.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Data aquisition & Bioreactor, these two courses involve matlab programming, which is not familiar with international students, and there"s no special notice in this course description.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied mechatronics and Modeling and simulation. Change teachers...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Internet Technology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- e-Health» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MOCI should give more ECTS» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I found the GIS course way to easy and unpractical, could be very applicable if well structured. Environmental System Analysis course overlaps with many of the elective courses (RA, LCA) does not need to be mandatory. Period 2 and 3 year the first year have kind of limited course selection and it would help to have more relevant elective course suggestions. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Change the teacher in Digital Integrated Circuit Design.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MOCI course is REALLY heavy, while project management is really light. Those two should be leveld» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material science, allt täcks av andra kurser i programmet» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise Managing developing projects, fix the boring case for example. Let the students practice managing projects instead of making them interview companies who do.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Make modelling/fabrication course less specific to one project. Rather than having own specific project to work on, spend time in the lab with different research groups while they work to get a broader sense of what research is like throughout nanoscience.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- For a program like Secure and Dependable Computer Systems, there is a high possibility of either going into Security domain or dependability track. I have chosen dependability track as my background and interest suits it. But there were compulsory courses like Logic in Computer Science(related roughly to formal methodology) and Computer security, which may not be of much interest for me in terms of career. but Good to know. So I suppose such courses should be made elective to the students. And compulsory to students who want to take on Security track rather than for students who want to take Dependability track. But I would imagine these are masters program related specifics. But may be worth a thought. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems I and II should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mostly beacuse of the teachers» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global Chemical Sustainability is usually taken parallel with Experimental Design and has a huge amount of text to be handled. It"s very hard to manage both courses to a reasonable extent.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Protein engineering, seems like a really interesting course but I had to change it since it pretty much demanded that one would skip the other course due to schedule clashes(which was promised to be solved, but what they did was to presume that one would skip all parts of the other course that wasn"t mandatory, awful). A solution to the problem is if one would get 15 pt as the GU students do instead of 7.5 pt as we chalmersstudent get. I know they are doing some additional work but from what I have heard that part ain"t too heavy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- freight transport systems, physical distribution» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth must not be mandatory...it can be an elective. Instead, a course on signal processing must be included.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Road Vehicle Aerodynamics should be given to all the students interested.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced metal forming and casting. There are so many things in this course, which makes it hard for us to master all of them.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- It is reasonable to remove AI from game design programme next year. I think ID Methodologies should be replaced by another more technical course for the game design students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The second year of the program is open for electives, however there aren"t many courses available that are related to some of the tracks of the program, which makes the first year of the program a lot more valuable than the second.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- AI course feels like it is an extension course and not an introductory course, it doesn"t cover any ground or discuss broadly about the subject with the exception of just six lectures.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nuclear chemistry and sustainable energy future » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Internet Technology Distributed Systems 2 Real Time Systems» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Bio refinery and global chemical sustainability. Less mandatory courses would be nice.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The biopolymer course (but I know it"s allready planned to be exchanged) MTS course about etics in within biotechnique, it doesn"t give the student any new information and is a waste of time. Data aquisition and handling doesn"t give the students a good knowledge and the students don"t learn anything» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Six Sigma, Integrated Product development, Managing Operations processes. They are all suffering from severe quality problems and are having a big gap between what the students expect and what the teacher delivers. This is extra embarrassing since we are studying "quality", but the teachers do never listen to criticism that we give through the course evaluations» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think "omstart EDIT" will bring forth the weakest links..» (Yes (3 to 4))
- automation,risk management» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Environmental risk assessment in Engineering» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Wireless networks SSY145 is by far the worst course I"ve taken at Chalmers. It has no focus on the topic. The distributed systems courses should be revised to deal with more updated frameworks» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Jag tycker inte kurserna skall tas bort, de är relevanta för området. Men försvåras och göras lite mer avancerade.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- FFR160 and FFR170 should be merged into one course since they are so similar to each other. MEN115 should be removed, the whole course is bad from the examiner to the content of the course. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Internet Security Distributed Systems Distributed Systems II» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Linux, Operating Systems, » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Many courses need more depth » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Biorefinary-Pollution Prevention- Global chemical Sustainability- Plant Design (I don"t remember the exact name at Chalmers cause I had the same, more broader course in my B.Sc)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think Freight transport systems and management of physical distribution could be merged into one course. The first course was too much information on a low level and the second course was too little information to be considered a 7.5 hec course - pick the best parts of the first course and add to the second course and you have a perfect 7.5 hec course. The manufacturing and supply chain planning course is very interesting, but given the work load it should be worth more than 7.5 hec. Finally, customer relationships is a very weird course. Five weeks into the course I still have no idea what it is about. I think using a course book instead of a bunch of articles could solve that problem.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Give the students a bit more freedom within the course projects and everything is at a very low level, you can almost get away with anything.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- DECO and Real Time control systems need to be revised.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Applied mechatronics, Modelling and simulation, Robotics and robots systems.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- - Strategic management and economics of intellectual property (maybe not removed but for sure revised at least) - Idea evaluation and feasibility studies (the goals and structure of the course is absolutely different from what we experienced in it) - Strategy creation and change (improved and revised .. has a lot of potential but it is lost due to structure of the course) - Managing development projects (revised at least) - TEK350 (revised at least. too much legal issues and there is a different course for the swedish and for the non-swedish students, which makes it unfair for ine of the groups) » (Yes (3 to 4))
- TDA289 Människa - dator interaktion Horrible course that a three year old could do. I did not attend one lecture or read the book and still got grade 4... Teachers are arrogant and not friendly. Don"t seem like they know much. DAT135 Software architecture This is such an important course! To bad Sven-Arne abuses it. I did not learn anything but now i wish that i could understand larger systems. DAT180 Software leadership and quality management Hard course to teach but not executed very well. Give us tools instead of fluffy words. EDA203 Unix internals Why teach FreeBSD that is 15 years old? Arne should retire and let someone teach Linux. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Under den första obligatoriska terminen, överlappar kurserna väldigt mycket vilket gör att termin 1 känns otroligt upprepande. Jag tror att om kursen Construction governance, samordnas mer med Project Management, Managing Organisations in the Construction Industry och Construction Contract Relations så är den inte nödvändig. Istället tycker jag verkligen att en ekonomikurs skulle vara till mycket större nytta. Det ligger dessutom en ekonomikurs i Lp 2 som International Project Management läser, varför inte lägga in den som obligatorisk istället? När det gäller de valbara kurserna åk 1, lp 3 & lp 4, så var det väldigt mycket schema krockar som gjorde att det knappast gick att läsa någon av de valbara kurserna om man även ville läsa de rekommenderade. Skulle detta kunna lösas smidigare?» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The compulsory courses (except for intro to SCM) are pretty bad. I"d rather have some optional courses, such as Lean manufacturing, as compulsory.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced sketching, Computer aided design and Project IDE, are courses that might need to be revised.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Remove or reconstruct safety & hybrid courses» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Sustainabale Building 1-3. Very interesting subject, but very unorganized course. It lacks of clear guidelines and demands from the teacher.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- From the mandatory courses during the fall the environmental systems analysis course should be heavily revised» (Yes (3 to 4))
- At least learn the lectureres to teach in a good way. Many of the courses have really bad teachers which would have needed a couple of pedagogical courses.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Sustainable building (1-3) is a badly constructed and not thought through studio. It should be revised so that it is clear from the beginning what the studio is about and what the outcome should be in the end. Some parts of the studio are really interesting but unfortunately they are not that attractive since you have to participate in all the bed parts of the course to get them.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The compalsary courses should be revised.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I could have learned a lot more, some courses were too easy to pass. For instance in marine machinery, ship hydrostatics and maritime economics. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- All the mandatory courses, especially Agile Methodologies.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Revis Project Management to include practical guidelines and tools. Today its only a basic course in general ideas and do not add value to the students. Revise Building in Society as its only aim is to give the students a common understanding of the basic interface between construction and society. This is master level and the learnings from this course should be a prerequisite for the program! Revise Managing Organizations in the Construction Industry as it is purely academic in its approach. It only addresses organizational behaviour which is only remotely relevant in my opinion. I chose not to take Environmental Management, International Project Management, The Architecture... course and the Logistics course in year 2 because they were irrelevant to me. Instead, I chose courses from other programs which says something about the course selection in DCPM. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Construction Governance. The course was very unstructured, no feedback on hand in or exam, and a great part of the course is repetition from other courses and does therefore not need to be an own cours. I would rather have any of the optional courses from third semster in the first semester. Besides, I did not find the international project course satisfying. some classes was unclear and many lectures was also canceled why I did not learn that much. finally, the project management course was not at all satisfying, teacher was always late, lectures not productive and in general the course did not teach my that much. I learned the most from that course already in year one at Chalmers in an economics cours. However I think with lots of improvements and newthinking, this cours have potential to be interesting.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Food microbiology is to much of the "Metabolism och teknisk mikrobiology" from the Bachelor. Data acqusition should be more hands on and not just so much theory.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Questin every course every year, that is the only way to keep the education relevant. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Industrial engineering needs to be revised, most of content is good but the structure/order needs to be revised. (less commercial maybe? PPA???? the questions asked in the method gives a good understanding, but method as whole should not take up that much hours, revise the project.) THe course production logistics is teached on a basic level but the exam is on a much higher level, the lectures should give guidence to what to study/what"s important. And the exam should reflect the course. THe course Automation need to revise the student lectures, the concept is good but too many students where "sick" meaning some groups did not present one lecture and some presented two. It"s not that much fun too present a lecture when there are 5 (of 20)students present. The robot course need to be less comercial. more information about how to do things instead of telling us how complicated things are. i"m not only interested in what one could do, i want to try!. The lab PMs have a very illogical structure and a lot of things seem to be implied but for someone who never handled a robotprogram befor they"re not. Instead of the projects (waste of time!), combine the labs to make a project and presentation. Maybe lego lab and a project/labb with presentation. THe kinematics examples need to be calculated and explanied on the board not only shown. Could use a bit more entusiasm from the lecturer! » (Yes (3 to 4))
- most of the courses have too much moments and are too heavy.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Structural systems, materials performance and heat and moisture engineering should be removed from the program.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Well, again, I believe that the programme should be entirely divided into two or three separate programmes.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced CAD - Valuable course, bu there must be another way how to examine the knowledge of the student. Make a course where you only learn cad, and as many tools as possible and skip the exam. I got 5 and didn"t learn much. Maybe you could add material choice, manufacturability, drawings and prototyping and call the course "product design". Mechatronics - bad course structure and really hard to get assistance FEM - more assistants needed Do not remember more than this.... » (Yes (3 to 4))
- heat and moisture, material performance, structural systems» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Take away "topic reports" and seminars and replace them with case studies which are more rewardable!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Finite element simulation in design (should be heavily revised) Advanced computer aided design (should be revised to some extent) Applied mechatronics (This is easily the worst course i"ve ever taken on Chalmers so far. Remove it!) Materials selection and design (This course doesn"t really add any knowledge to people with a bachelor in mechanical engineering)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- organizational project management strategic management international projects» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Intercultural comunication. Take back the info part because that is very important info for students not coming from Chalmers to know.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1- Bioelectromagnetism course is not so related to program. 2- Diagnostic imaging course needs better organization and teachers 3- Image Analysis course needs better organization and syllabus » (Yes (3 to 4))
- unix/linux, operating systems,» (Yes (3 to 4))
- CFD and Global Chemical Sust. consume much time» (Yes (3 to 4))
- opertions management sucked and the QOM course didn"t give much book in IPD is 18 years old!!!!!!!!!!!!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- ex. Material mechanics» (Yes more than 5)
- Vehicle traffic and safety (TME200) is quite useless, this could might as well be incorporated in the initial "introduction to automotive engineering" course, which in turn also should be revised. The Powertrain and ICE courses should include more workshop-based education. Most people still don´,t know how a piston or crankshaft looks (or works) despide graduating the automotive engineer programme. The course in hybrid vehicles was a big dissapointment, i cant figure out one sensible thing that i learned during that course.» (Yes more than 5)
- Now that Mats Winroth changed the Managing operations processes course, I suggest that it should be changed back, i.e., to use the service operations management book in order to get the valuable service operations perspective. The improvement project course was elective but it should become more structured and the curriculum should better fit the learning outcome. In the platform development course, the projects must be revised, they were not so instructive. The Design for Quality course should consider examining the course in a different way other than by a home exam. The improvement projects for 15 HEC in the third and fourth quarter of the first year were not so much in line with the program.» (Yes more than 5)
- The work compared to the points is not fair. » (Yes more than 5)
- All except Intercultural Leadership» (Yes more than 5)
- But "Methods for electronic system design and verification" really needs to be revised. The idea of the course / the course outline is excellent, but the implementation is horrible.» (No)
- My opinion is that we could have more choices for students to choose from since different students really have their own interests.» (No)
- Mångar kurser är mycket repetition, tex om wetting och contactangle samt en del om polymerer, vore mer intressant om det gick djupare istället» (No)
- Some changes in structure of some courses, but nothing worse than that.» (No)
- No, but i think the order should vary» (No)
- for some reason, EIA course is not given for 2-3 years and I wanted to do that. But although there were some students to apply for that course, the course did not run.» (No)
- I dont think any course needs to be revised heavily, but the courses should be revised to keep up with the developments in the field. I am very satisfied that I have learnt about the latest technology in this field. Hope the courses are revised regularly so that the in coming years the subject being taught is contemporary and relevant.» (No)
- We focused on ISM in around 3 subjects instead of core basics of the lessons. Why did not we study a comprehensive ISM Course instead of 3 subjects? » (No)
- It all comes down to teaching, out of 8 courses only 3 (wireless and photonics systen eng, active microwave, industrial management)had sufficient level of teaching. The rest is a disaster and the worst I"ve experienced during my 4 years at Chalmers.» (No)
- » (No)
- alla kurser bra, men vi behöver mer tid» (No)
- We"ve been working on havily revising a few courses, but until they next batch of student take them we won"t know if they are satisfactory. Mainly the demands and expectations where too low.» (No opinion)
- I was on exchange during the first year of the program so I can"t really judge this» (No opinion)
- I can"t remember anyone right now. » (No opinion)

Programme administration

23. How satisfied are you with the programme administration?

1314 svarande

Not at all»		27		2%
Not so satisfied»		104		7%
Neither/Nor»		171		13%
Satisfied»		655		49%
Very satisfied»		304		23%
No opinion»		54		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

24. How satisfied are you with the support from the Student centre?

Not at all»		24		1%
Not so satisfied»		68		5%
Neither/Nor»		143		10%
Satisfied»		587		44%
Very satisfied»		380		28%
No opinion»		119		9%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

Study climate

25. Did you feel welcomed by Chalmers and the staff at the Masters programme during your first days?

No, not at all»		20		1%
To some extent»		82		6%
Quite OK»		268		20%
Yes definitely»		629		47%
Excellent welcoming»		275		20%
No opinion»		48		3%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

26. How satisfied are you with the cooperation between you and your fellow students?

Not at all»		32		2%
Not so satisfied»		95		7%
Neither/Nor»		100		7%
Satisfied»		616		46%
Very satisfied»		456		34%
No opinion»		17		1%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

27. How satisfied are you with the opportunities to come in contact with teachers?

1320 svarande

Not at all»		12		0%
Not so satisfied»		66		5%
Neither/Nor»		88		6%
Satisfied»		637		48%
Very satisfied»		490		37%
No opinion»		27		2%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

28. Do you think that the student opinions and results from course evaluations have significant impact (taken seriously by the Programme coordinator)?

Not at all»		60		4%
To some extent»		236		17%
Could be improved»		362		27%
Yes, definetly»		481		36%
No opinion»		173		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

29. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Master programme have a good pedagogical ability?

0-20 %»		31		2%
20-40 %»		106		8%
40-60 %»		360		27%
60-80 %»		561		43%
80-100 %»		246		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

30. How large percentage (%) of the teachers in the core subjects within the Masters programme have a good ability to teach in English?

0-20 %»		15		1%
20-40 %»		58		4%
40-60 %»		196		14%
60-80 %»		467		35%
80-100 %»		576		43%

Genomsnitt: 4.17

31. To what extent is your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree sufficient to attend this programme?

Very poor»		10		0%
Poor»		36		2%
OK»		149		11%
Good»		411		31%
Very good»		698		53%
No opinion»		11		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

32. To what extent do the courses in the programme make use of, develop and deepen your knowledge/competence from your Bachelor degree?

1313 svarande

0-20 %»		49		3%
20-40 %»		137		10%
40-60 %»		362		27%
60-80 %»		555		42%
80-100 %»		210		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

33. How often do you use Chalmers Library resources

Never»		216		16%
Once or twice a month»		598		45%
Once or tvice a week»		362		27%
Almost every day»		143		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.32

- almost never, but closer to never then once or twice per month» (Never)
- The library resources were only neccessary for the masters thesis.» (Never)
- Only in the Master Thesis Work» (Never)
- only during my thesis» (Never)
- Q.31 & 32, I think the demands are too low, I expected the master program to be more demanding than the bachelor program. I don"t know what the reason is, but too much consideration is taken to people who have taken the bachelor elsewhere. We who have studied at Chalmers need to feel that the master program is a step up and not a step sideways in our education. My own degrees went up on average from ~3,8 to ~4,8 when comparing bachelor and master courses - and this with putting in fewer hours per week. I doubt I got smarter all of a sudden.» (Never)
- used it once for my thesis work» (Never)
- Almost never.» (Never)
- Been there twice and they have been unable to meet demands at both times. However the staff was very helpful and service minded on both occasions. First was a master thesis that had not been published yet(not something that they could help with) The other was ISO documentation published in 2010 which they did not have. I have however made use of the fact that many research papers published online in .pdf format are free to download if accessed from the Chalmers network. » (Never)
- Once or twice a year» (Never)
- Only for masters thesis» (Never)
- Not saying it"s bad. Just haven"t tried it...» (Never)
- I have used the resources once for the course "Kommunikation och ingenjörskompetens", that is all.» (Never)
- Never had a reason to use it until recently, but it was quite tricky to find the articles I was looking for. But I haven"t tried it enough to state whether the site is good or bad. » (Never)
- No need for support since I can find everything through internet.» (Never)
- Ocassionaly» (Never)
- about once or twice of a quarter» (Never)
- Do you mean for literature and references (probably haven"t used it at al during my time on Chalmers) or how often I use the library for studying (always studying for exams there)?» (Never)
- I answered these questions according my idea about the name of the major which i selected"Networks and distributed systems". May be these courses are good but it"s not completely related to Networks and distributed Systems» (Never)
- Once» (Never)
- because with didnot get enough time to search things in library and then read it.second our course books are also not that much available in the library» (Never)
- Twice a year?» (Never)
- Less then once or twice » (Never)
- Better PR wouldn"t hurt.» (Never)
- I tried the publication search a few times, but I never found what I was looking for.» (Never)
- Chalmers Library is in a big need of rebuilding, make more studyplaces and more course books, and a lot more students would use it... Also more wall sockets for charging computer etc would be good. All thats missing from the picture, I guess, is money. » (Never)
- Only when necessary, mostly for finding articles that can"t be accessed from home.» (Never)
- Almost never.» (Never)
- Once or twice a year.» (Never)
- if acm counts as an clib resource, then every day. Otherwise never.» (Never)
- only during my master thesis» (Never)
- I used them but more seldom than once or twice a month» (Never)
- I use it less then once a month» (Never)
- To complicated to access info» (Never)
- More with the master thesis» (Once or twice a month)
- Depends on what courses i have been taking.» (Once or twice a month)
- Only with databases linked from their website» (Once or twice a month)
- Once per course when we "pick up" all the relevant articles» (Once or twice a month)
- The master thesis would be impossible to do without the chalmers library resources» (Once or twice a month)
- Mostly group rooms booking» (Once or twice a month)
- More/any information on what is available would be nice.» (Once or twice a month)
- but only for the master thesis» (Once or twice a month)
- Usually never but now in the master thesis I use them alot.» (Once or twice a month)
- Not enough books in theoretical physics. Judging by the focus of the literature one would think this is a school for architects and CAD programmers.» (Once or twice a month)
- Use the article databases every other month» (Once or twice a month)
- i use books only few times a year, but databases and scientific scripits i use for almost every project» (Once or twice a month)
- Its a great library but I seldom used it, for my own reasons.» (Once or twice a month)
- N/A» (Once or twice a month)
- Previously there were fixed chairs (without wheels) in the silent reading room, that I personally find ergonomically more convenient and comfortable, then I attended much more frequently. The library redesign brought many improvements except the chairs which are also very important.» (Once or twice a month)
- Some of the teachers are very good lecturers - M . Cederwall, Ulf Gran, Gabriele Ferreti. Some are indistinct, are confusing and incapable of keeping a logical stairway or just to insecure socially to give good lectures - S Östlund, P Salomonsson. » (Once or twice a month)
- If you split it over one semester» (Once or twice a month)
- Depends a lot on the course» (Once or twice a month)
- Once a term maybe?» (Once or twice a month)
- Mainly e-journals. However I usually find Google to be superior for finding articles and only use the library"s proxy to access them.» (Once or twice a month)
- Depending on if course literature is availiable. If it is I use it more.» (Once or twice a month)
- I have used them a extensively for the master"s thesis but not at all before» (Once or twice a month)
- Only for some (very few) courses» (Once or twice a month)
- More ebooks would be nice» (Once or twice a month)
- I like the possibility to access articles online and I do this quite frequently.» (Once or twice a month)
- it differs a lot» (Once or twice a month)
- sometimes i have log in trouble.» (Once or twice a month)
- Very good to have during master thersis. » (Once or twice a month)
- a brief introduction would benn prefered.» (Once or twice a month)
- It ı,s too narrow to study in the library. It will be better if it can be extended. I really want to grab some books sit and read there but the seatings are either in the entrance or in the middle while other people are searching for books..» (Once or twice a month)
- In all cases we perform in courses. The e-resources are very important.» (Once or twice a month)
- Mostly web services such as the proxy.» (Once or twice a month)
- Most of all of us are living abroad so we have the chance to borrow books only once a month, generally.» (Once or twice a month)
- It will be good if the number of books in the library is increased.Some time it will be hard to get the books in the needed time during the course program.» (Once or twice a month)
- moslty started to use it when we started our master thesis. » (Once or twice a month)
- I go online and find the articles in the couse literature day one and then i use the library to find more information to complete assignments» (Once or twice a month)
- I would rather say I use Chalmers library resources 3-4 times per year.» (Once or twice a month)
- maybe once or twice a year» (Once or twice a month)
- Many books/references could be also found as E-book, but they were not in chalmers library. 70% the essential book references for courses where not in chalmers library, or where only in 3 copies which was not enough for the students.» (Once or twice a month)
- Some periods a lot to access journals and papers, then almost every day. As mean twice a month.» (Once or twice a month)
- Not at all during the regular semesters both daily during the master thesis.» (Once or twice a month)
- very good equipment» (Once or twice a month)
- Mostly research for articles on the web.» (Once or twice a month)
- For my master programme, architecture, I really did not need books or resources. However I used the library for the courses I have taken from other master programmes.» (Once or twice a month)
- some books are available in very few number.» (Once or twice a month)
- They are very good indeed, however I"m generally too lazy to use it.» (Once or twice a month)
- Using it more and more due to that where doing more and more reports with academic references.» (Once or twice a month)
- It is even more often now during the master thesis. But once, or twice a month can be seen as an avarage number.» (Once or twice a month)
- The online databases and acces to e-books etc. are brilliant!!!» (Once or twice a month)
- can have more books related to management compared to colleges of chalmers standard the books are quite less» (Once or twice a month)
- few times a year would have been a more correct answer if possible to answer» (Once or twice a month)
- Difficult to navigate to and grasp how many databases/e-journals are relevant for ones subject. » (Once or twice a month)
- Once each 6 months» (Once or twice a month)
- Many times the books I wanted were on loan. To have more available as ebooks would be nice.» (Once or twice a month)
- The online resources have been most useful to me. » (Once or twice a month)
- No of books should be increased.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Some course text books are not so many in the Chalmers library which may be improved.» (Once or tvice a week)
- I used the ability to get articles for reports.» (Once or tvice a week)
- More often now than earlier.» (Once or tvice a week)
- During my master thesis i am using it almost every day» (Once or tvice a week)
- on average over the two years» (Once or tvice a week)
- The studyenvironment is close to perfection and the staff there are helpful» (Once or tvice a week)
- Mostly searching for scientific articles» (Once or tvice a week)
- This semester I am writing my master"s thesis, but during the first year and a half of the program I did not use library resources very much.» (Once or tvice a week)
- really nice that we could borrow the books for 3 months» (Once or tvice a week)
- I"m a huge fan of the library even if Id love it to extend the opening hours even more.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Mostly the databases like IEEE, ACM and such.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Access to Journals and papers» (Once or tvice a week)
- Varies. While doing thesis, use it almost every day.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Mostly internet resources, but every now and then I borrow books. The access to databases and e-publications is extremely important.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Use it a lot to search for published articles» (Once or tvice a week)
- I use a lot of articles from the e-journals and also e-books.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Mostly for accessing research papers and books over the internet.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Architecture library.» (Once or tvice a week)
- not enough books for lectures --> I almost have to buy. they are quite expensive.» (Once or tvice a week)
- The answer is based on the present usage, which is higher than before due to master"s thesis writing. » (Once or tvice a week)
- Almost every day during the Master thesis, else when I am doing projects. Answer is a mean. » (Once or tvice a week)
- mostly I use online resources and that is almost everyday.» (Once or tvice a week)
- couldn"t performe my studies without it, it is a valuable asset and will be missed after graduation!» (Once or tvice a week)
- There are not sufficient text books available at the library. It could be a good idea that Library can facilate the exchange of used books from ex-students at each course to new students that need the text books.» (Once or tvice a week)
- an, easier to use, interface would help. "What external resources can i access with my library card, and what resources can i access within the Chalmers domain?" » (Once or tvice a week)
- It is rude and makes difficult to adapt to the course when teachers talks in swedish during the lessons, since the program language is just english and accept foreign students. It feels like the teachers are not prepared enough when they put swedish words to the lecture slides.» (Once or tvice a week)
- Depends on the courses.» (Once or tvice a week)
- The access to online databases and scientific journals is excellent.» (Once or tvice a week)
- almost only web services» (Once or tvice a week)
- Especially during the thesis work.» (Once or tvice a week)
- during exam weeks I use it more» (Once or tvice a week)
- could be perfect if the architecture library opened in the weekend and holiday!» (Once or tvice a week)
- Articles, recerense guidence etc.» (Once or tvice a week)
- That depends on weeks, I guess some weeks I use it almost every day and other not at all.. » (Once or tvice a week)
- depends on if we have a project in the course, them I go up there to search for articles often.. otherwise it might become more seldom. but i often sit there and study without using any of the resources specific to the library» (Once or tvice a week)
- During the thesis I have used it almost every day. » (Once or tvice a week)
- I think the architecture library is vital for an ongoing discussion on the subject of architecture as well as providing references to students in the form of magazines and books. It"s one of the few sources of theory-based understanding of space(s) which is provided to the students in a fairly practical education» (Once or tvice a week)
- very good rules» (Once or tvice a week)
- Very useful for projects and for finding course literature» (Once or tvice a week)
- Databases of articles are extremely useful» (Almost every day)
- In thesis writing it has been a trusted friend» (Almost every day)
- The ability to freely search for articles is an outstanding feature.» (Almost every day)
- Almost never when I was in the courses but now almost always during the master thesis period.» (Almost every day)
- Make it available for Alumni! http://medlib.bu.edu/» (Almost every day)
- Störst problemet är att masterkoordinatorna är extremt upptagen och är svår att få tag på och även få några besked ifrån. Han är ansvarig för introduktionskursen som är den mest oklara när det gäller mål/examination och bedömmning. » (Almost every day)
- The web resources at Chalmers Library are exceptional. I am extremely happy with the library resources and hope it only grows bigger from here.» (Almost every day)
- For some books, the resource should be improved. Sometimes it takes to long time for a book because they have only one copy.» (Almost every day)
- For my thesis work!» (Almost every day)
- very useful.» (Almost every day)
- Nice place to concentrate on work.» (Almost every day)
- Include all the cards in the same one... There is no need to have one card from every single thing» (Almost every day)
- there is no need for a card different from the student union/entrance card... they all should be the same» (Almost every day)
- Every day ebook/ejournal Once a week library visit» (Almost every day)
- Especially now when I am doing my master"s thesis. Before it was more once or twice a month.» (Almost every day)
- databases, SAE et.c» (Almost every day)
- I have never experienced a library like this in my life. I always feel proud to be Chalmerist.» (Almost every day)
- I love the new function to search for articles, books etc. SUMMON» (Almost every day)
- Specially when it comes to develop the MSc Thesis» (Almost every day)
- during the thesis work almost every day, but when I was on the regular courses I did not.» (Almost every day)
- Lib.chalmers.se is one of the pages i use the most since we almost in every course do literature review» (Almost every day)

34. In what way do (or could ) Chalmers library support you in your Masters Programme studies

Summarizing questions

35. Considering your experience from this programme, would you choose this programme if you could turn back time?

No»		37		2%
Probably not»		67		5%
I would consider it»		198		15%
Yes - probably»		387		29%
Yes»		617		46%
No opinion»		7		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- I just realized I could not be work in technical areas. I realized I should go to study management instead» (No)
- Cause I "m not sure if other programs are not the same .» (No)
- I don"t feel that I get to use the knowledge that I gained in my bachelor. The level of knowledge that my master program requires from us student is way to low. » (No)
- It idid not offer me what was promissed, I quote a fellow student(international): "If I wanted to be a progammer, I would have been done after 3 years.. I was looking to devlope my management skills, but obviosly this masterprogramme do not offer that"» (No)
- The courses of the programme are to wide. If you want to study geotechnics or geology for instance, there are only a few courses available. Hence you must study water and environment also to get a degree. » (No)
- It did not meet my expectations.» (No)
- You do not learn anything useful.» (No)
- Have read a lot of courses from another program (MPPEN) that suited me better» (No)
- I"ve thought to continue my study with engineering approach but my current program has totally academic approach instead.I made a mistake to choose because I anticipated to find applicable knowledge in industrial area , but , it seems they have a different idea to find a job with my program.» (No)
- The marketing department makes to good of a job. Expectations get set to high for what it is. Many of the courses are to basic, I haven"t learned that much. The people that runs the Encubator doesn"t communicate or make any efforts to communcicate with the students. They are not humble at all and the deals/offers that we as students gets with shares are a joke. 7 out of 17 quit the programe during the last year. That was the 7 of the most driven people. The program can"t handle the driven students» (No)
- It"s not in the range of subject I expected.» (No)
- I do not want to be academician the goal of this program is to make you phd student or teacher, I want to work, this program would not give you any aspect in work situation. » (No)
- You don"t learn anything and it"s completely wrong for me personally.» (No)
- Nothing to do with the program itself. Wanna study deeper and change a little the area of research in natural science after 2 years of learning and have an idea of what academy looks like.» (No)
- Cause the level is to low in general. To academic and the learning is based on learning by heart rather than understanding and applying knowledge. In soem courses it felt like being back at highs chool. » (No)
- The most part of Chalmers courses have no quality of knowleges but quantity to the exams what is not soo good for the students to wish to continue learning and to go deeper in these questions.» (No)
- I selected this major because i though that i can study and search about Network on chip which is i like it,,,but i couldn"t find any course related to it and even i"m forgetting all about that:)» (No)
- I have alread studied all courses of this programme in my bachelor degree and before applying I thought I would have deeper knowledge and be profecient in a certain area.» (No)
- Because I have come to know that studying in the Network program would have given me the exact same knowledge and even more in some subjects. However the software engineering program would have been the program to choose for me because I like team work and that is the only program I see in my department that emphasizes on team work and by team I mean more than 3 students not just two in every single course!» (No)
- First of all Internet technology course was a total mess. 2. I"ve got the feeling that the majority of my colegues come from a totally different area(Not computer science). They don"t really know to write a line of code. Therefore i had to do all my assignments alone even if we should work in groups. 3. Some of the lab assistants did not have a clue about what they ware supposed to teach. » (No)
- Because there are no opportunities to be employed in a company. None of my classmates have been employed so far.» (No)
- The information regarding the program did not at all describe its content accurately.» (No)
- P.g.a. att både Sustainable Building 1 och 2 hade såpass låg nivå och var så oorganiserade så önskar jag att jag hade valt Architecture istället.» (No)
- It wasn"t like going a program, it was like reading a predefined set of courses when you wanted. It wasn"t like having a class and I didn"t notice any follow up for the class. Secondly the class was 100% men and 95% exchange students. That"s not good at all.» (No)
- Big disappointment. Have learnt nothing. Bad organisation. Waste of time and money» (No)
- I got admission in that program but it was not my feature area .so i can"t continue and change subject which is related to network » (Probably not)
- It"s too heavily focused on development, and I don"t see myself being a development engineer.» (Probably not)
- I feel the the learnings have a to small usage in reality(no, they are not unusable, but they are to abstract for any employment I can possibly have in the first year of my career) compared to how big they could have been. I feel that it is the same thing over and over again, and this is although I not studied at Industrial Engineering during my Bachelor.» (Probably not)
- too hard for me, leaves less time for me to do other things i like such as learning swedish» (Probably not)
- Wrong focus. Several semi mandatory courses have been dedicated to the department telling us what the department does in research and why we should come work for them, instead of actually teaching us things that are used in the business world.» (Probably not)
- The educational level is poor, worse than the BA programme» (Probably not)
- It seems hard to find a job. If I could choose again, I would choose something more practical, relate to engineering, energy or industry. » (Probably not)
- Mostly because of the two courses TDA596 Distributed systems and TDA297 Distributed systems, advanced course. Both of which was far to easy and didn"t go into deeply enough into the subject of distributed systems.» (Probably not)
- To much soft courses. Should have taken CompSci» (Probably not)
- This was never my first choice, in addition, there where a lot of more appealing programs that we never got any information about.» (Probably not)
- it wasn"t what I expected, The focus of this program is not really well stated in the goals and oportunities to work» (Probably not)
- I found myself more like to be an engineer and this program is not so easily to found a job» (Probably not)
- The mandatory courses in this mp are aimed in somewhat diffrent directions. Had I choosen again, I would have choosen a mp with less mandatory courses and then cherry picked some of the courses from this mp.» (Probably not)
- Because there is no relevance between the courses at all» (Probably not)
- It is too much to do in this master programme.» (Probably not)
- I do not feel that I am learning much things that would be useful in the industry I am aiming for.» (Probably not)
- Doesn"t have too many job opportunities» (Probably not)
- It is difficult to find a job for this programme» (Probably not)
- The level is low. Especially I am very disappointed at the quality of master thesis projects. There are many poor projects which pass with same result as elaborate projects.. » (Probably not)
- too difficult» (Probably not)
- Some compulsory are not neccessary for some track.» (Probably not)
- If I could turn back time I could do more economically beneficial things... like betting a lot of money on sport events that I already know the result of. Really? Stupid question or what...» (Probably not)
- Overall the core courses are not so satisfying..comparing my friends at other universities like Uppsala.» (Probably not)
- Because we pretty much left by ourselves, and we are making the research, repports that should have been tought before hand by the professors, Thtere has been only two professors so far that make sure that they have explained the main lines of the course before we have to make/deliver the repports.» (Probably not)
- Cause I might need to go for other programs» (Probably not)
- As it was just very little add on to already available knowledge and the goals are too low for a master"s degree. » (Probably not)
- I wish to learn things differently, I like very much some content, but I wouldn"t learn in the same course in the same way. » (Probably not)
- I would probably choose cs:all because it"s more programming and less business/management. » (Probably not)
- I wouldve picked the product development master and then only taken the powertrain courses from automotive» (Probably not)
- "Cause it was far from my first expectations,,I"ve already moved to another field in another Programme!!» (Probably not)
- I am not satisfied with the education level and workload.» (Probably not)
- The tuition fee» (Probably not)
- There are no jobs available in the biomaterial field. we know a little bit of everything, but not enough of anything!» (Probably not)
- I think my concideration of biotech was different than this. Chalmers as it is from technology side it more focus on engineering part than the biology part. May Be it is because I am more interested on biological part.» (Probably not)
- I would choose a more practical programme with less focus on management.» (Probably not)
- My interests have changed during my studies.» (Probably not)
- after finishing the courses the appourtunity to get a good Mater thesis is very weak!!» (Probably not)
- The program is not on the correct way. some teacher do not have complete bio background. some courses like image diagnostics is not taught by the correct person. some courses are extremely important and useful like image diagnostics but few attention has been paid to it. the course could even be segmented to 2 different courses to cover the material more deeply.» (Probably not)
- I think that many of the courses are to similar. Often, I think, the level is not really advanced. E.g. the course ESA was not on a very high level compared to my prevoius knowledge from two earlier masters courses.» (Probably not)
- It was not in master level in first year. In fact, courses were too general for a master student!» (Probably not)
- More intrested in other areas and some mathematics and not the way around.» (Probably not)
- I choose this program so as to transition or atleast gain some competence over a broad range of discipilines (Medicine and engineering). I evaluated many options during my almost over study phase here and there were no interdisciplinary courses to make this transition ... » (Probably not)
- To many of the courses didn"t meet acceptable standards. There may be many students at this program and the staff might get many enoying questions from stupid students. That is however not a reason to be rude and unhelpfull. When you spend two years of your life at an education like this you at least expect the staff to concider your requests seriously and to be helpfull. During the last year of my master i"ve several times experienced a very big resistance from the staff when asking for help in various matters. I think that this problem comes from a general bad attitude within the institution. If they want an attractive masters program i suggest they stop recenting their students and instead act as they actually think it"s fun that people choose their masters program.» (Probably not)
- because of bad curriculam» (Probably not)
- Advanced engineering materials program is primary focus on metal and few polymer matter. Nowdays, Material scientists are required to know broad knowledge such as energy materials.» (Probably not)
- The programm is not well organized. The programm cordinator is not involved. The research group is not strong.» (Probably not)
- In this program we have little changes to practise in research work,maybe because Swedish is required. » (Probably not)
- I don"t know if I would be an engineer if I knew it would be this hard.» (Probably not)
- the professor was too busy to communicate with me, he paid more attention to his PhD students » (Probably not)
- It is not quite practical, so many lectures with less concentration on lab work, though we are mater students. But so many lectures make us not different from the bachelor level study» (I would consider it)
- I really like to study space engineering technique not just science.» (I would consider it)
- It is a bit too similar to the bachelor programme, I would have liked more deepening knowledge.» (I would consider it)
- A bit unclear connection to the industry. Easier to connect work oppurtunities to some other masters programmes (e.g. software engineering).» (I would consider it)
- There is a lack of a good programme for students at the Z bachelor who are interested in production systems.» (I would consider it)
- I would like more courses like the ones on QOM. One more course more deep into the subject of quality management» (I would consider it)
- There may have been better alternatives for my profile, but I am very satisfied with my choice anyway.» (I would consider it)
- actually my first choice is communication engineering, i still feel myself is more suitable for that area, and I also choice my thesis related to that one, it is not because of the quality of my program integrated electronic system design.» (I would consider it)
- Det största problemet med SCM är att det är så överlappande från grundutbildning. Det känns som slöseri med min tid att rabbla samma saker som jag redan kan. » (I would consider it)
- The modules are to general definied. I want to have more modules with focus on managing technical projects.» (I would consider it)
- The programme needs to be more industry-oriented. the courses and teachers are great, but as further i get in the education the more i realize that there are not many option for getting a job afterwards. on the otherhand, it is a good master programme if you want to pursue an academic career.» (I would consider it)
- I would definitely choose the courses from the tissue engineering track again, but I don"t think that the compulsory courses were very rewarding.» (I would consider it)
- Seems there are other masters that fit my needs better such as for instance CAS.» (I would consider it)
- Two bad courses, but the general topic is good and it feels like a nice field to work in.» (I would consider it)
- I think it is a good programme but perhaps Industrial Ecology would have suited me more.» (I would consider it)
- Id really like to do more tissue engineering and to attend more of those courses. Theres a lot of courses thats not viewable in our choice of courses and the information regarding those courses are quite scarce. » (I would consider it)
- there is not much differences between different programmes» (I would consider it)
- If i would have gotten the option to attend to an other school I would have taken it before Chalmers. I think that my skills and knowledge has developed very little since i started my masters.» (I would consider it)
- probably I would have chosen the new pedagogical programme instead» (I would consider it)
- I would not pay the amount required now for non-EU citizens to attend.» (I would consider it)
- Have heard about several new masters programmes both abroad and in Sweden that i did not know about when I applied.» (I would consider it)
- With recent changes I think SET might not be the programme I would have chosen.» (I would consider it)
- My background does not fit to this program » (I would consider it)
- Some courses are really bad. » (I would consider it)
- It does"t feel like a master"s program, and their is only a couple of courses that are mandatory.» (I would consider it)
- The program is very broad, so it"s hard to acquire the specialization necessary to work with nanoscale processing in the future.» (I would consider it)
- I chose between solida and fluid and automotive. Today I would probably go for solid and fluid.» (I would consider it)
- I do not have another masters program at Chalmers that I could chose, even if I believe that a couple of others, for example Supply Chain Management, and MEJ, are much the same, with the same basic competence demands and much more interesting.» (I would consider it)
- With a revised spring semester I would definitely come back to the program. Compared to the excellent courses in autumn (Local context and Suburbs) the spring semester is just too weak if you"re not able to go to Africa.» (I would consider it)
- Think I would want more technical courses.» (I would consider it)
- It doesn"t prepare you quite as good for working as applied mechanics would. But it gives you a specialisation which is very valuable.» (I would consider it)
- Much of the material could be studied outside of class by own interest. The program doesn"t provide the in depth skills i hoped for, although many interesting subjects are discussed.» (I would consider it)
- I would maybe have chosen a program with less organic chemistry and more biochemistry and environmental science, and less engineering.» (I would consider it)
- My area of interest have changed a bit during my master, so I might have chosen another program, but it is difficult to say now. » (I would consider it)
- Yhe knowledge is hard to put into practice and leads nowhere.» (I would consider it)
- I would have to consider the new tuition fees, determine whether it is worth the cost to live and study here in Sweden» (I would consider it)
- There are almost no alternatives.» (I would consider it)
- It is not very challenging» (I would consider it)
- Think it is easier to get a job with some the other programmes.» (I would consider it)
- I was expecting more research oriented program where students are encouraged to work in collaboration with instructors in the department"s projects. » (I would consider it)
- it doesn"t fit my interest quite well. But it is industry oriented, I must say.» (I would consider it)
- If I knew the level of teaching I would think twice about choosing the same program. But the topics are still interesting» (I would consider it)
- The structure of Master programme is quite different from that in my home country. I would like check more information about related mater programme and choose my most interesting one finally if I could turn back time.» (I would consider it)
- I wanted something more industrial design oriented.» (I would consider it)
- But then I must know that there is more courses that attracts me. » (I would consider it)
- For the extend of the specific field I wanted to develop on. A lot of times I felt that I could have progressed in my profession on my own and without the help of the university. Feedback from curtain subjects was limited, in terms of what I was expecting to get from this master program.» (I would consider it)
- I think the information before choosing masters program is not enough to make a goood decision.» (I would consider it)
- As an international student with previous work experience, it would be more interesting if my fellow students had some work experience as well. » (I would consider it)
- Not sure it is the perfect match for me.» (I would consider it)
- I think according to professional job, i still need the certifications like PMP etc. even after doing the MSc in project managemnet. So when im already in job why should i quit the job and do this masters, sometimes i think it would have been better if i had continued working along with professional certifications only» (I would consider it)
- -» (I would consider it)
- The interests have changed during the time here. Maybe some other programme would be more sufficient. » (I would consider it)
- Maybe I would choose the new "Lärande ledarskap" instead.» (I would consider it)
- But I will try for other options too.» (I would consider it)
- I"m satisfied with the programme, but I"ve realised I have many other interests that might have made it better for me to study another programme.» (I would consider it)
- I feel like it is too much "flum". It is good, though, with project based courses instead of exams.» (I would consider it)
- Skip the different tracks and let us choose freely» (I would consider it)
- I would not look at which courses sounded interesting, but which teachers held them and not taken courses with teachers who can"t speak english.» (I would consider it)
- I have realized this year that i find other areas in mechanical engineering interesting to, and therefore i maybe would have choosed another program. And, i have also noticed that other programs have better team spirit and cohesion than us, depending on that they have better kick offs in the beginning of the years. It also depends on the students ofcourse. » (I would consider it)
- There should be more courses in patent etc as said above since there is a high demand on broader knowledge out at the job market. Have more site visits to get more contact with the industry!» (I would consider it)
- Not exactly what I had in mind but I"m not sure another programme would be more suitable» (I would consider it)
- because of the introduction of the fees, i would choose US,UK or Australia or even Germany (better automotive job opportunities)» (I would consider it)
- As a masters level, it doesn"t focus on one area, it touches every many areas. » (I would consider it)
- I would probably have chosen Industrial Ecology and then chosen some practical courses from this program. » (I would consider it)
- There are too many subjects in one master programme so the depth is lost.» (I would consider it)
- This programme was, and still is, the one with the type of courses and knowledge I wanted to gain during my studies. However, I do think that the programme has a too large focus on students being prepared for PhDs considering that a majority want to work in the industry immediately after the exam.» (Yes - probably)
- There are no other options » (Yes - probably)
- Yes I think I would, because the knowledge is very useful on a daily basis, since i work at Volvo cars. It"s very good to have this background when you work in Powertrain.» (Yes - probably)
- Slightly different from my expectations» (Yes - probably)
- To many compulsory courses» (Yes - probably)
- But I would choose different courses within the programme. » (Yes - probably)
- It takes a lot of time and I am not sure it will give me a correspondingly better knowledge and/or ability to get a good job comparing with other similar programmes.» (Yes - probably)
- In my opinion the program consists of a broad spectre of courses, which gives a lot of opportunities to work in different contexts.» (Yes - probably)
- Because I might have chosen other areas of study, not because this program has something wrong.» (Yes - probably)
- I found it a good extension of the EE bachelors program containing subjects that allow a little more depth into some EE fields, which is quite beneficial» (Yes - probably)
- I am content with what I have learned.» (Yes - probably)
- I am satisfied and based on friends studying other programs I can not see another that I would prefer. Besides all masters within this department is quite similar I think.» (Yes - probably)
- If i shouldn"t choose it, it would be because it has moved parts to Lindholmen. There has been no information about passage cards, rooms for studying, rooms for eating etc. Different platforms for students from GU and Chalmers is creating problems. Lecture halls in Lindholmen is of lower quality than at gibraltar. And the positive aspects pointed (close to industry etc) at for moving to Lindholmen is not anything that is helping the majority of the students. At least it is nothing that is noticed at this point in time. » (Yes - probably)
- I am only interested in mathematics.» (Yes - probably)
- (Why not): Many courses are too overlapping» (Yes - probably)
- Because the core courses are very good and the rest you can choose very freely» (Yes - probably)
- It is one of the best decisions I have made. I have learnt so much .. but could have learnt co much more!!! ... what a pity!!!» (Yes - probably)
- Det är ett väldigt bra program som till stor del håller bra kvalitet. Däremot finns det klart förbättringar som kan göras, och då gäller det främst den obligatoriska terminen. Kursen Project Management är ett skämt för att vara på masternivå och jag har aldrig varit med om att en lärar gjort ett så pass intressant ämne så tråkigt och lågprioriterat. » (Yes - probably)
- I would have chosen different courses within the programme. » (Yes - probably)
- It contains a mix of subjects I am very interested in. But it might not be specialized enough to fit the labor market. » (Yes - probably)
- No other program that would be a better alternative. Many elective courses though so it has been posible to choose courses from other programs» (Yes - probably)
- choice of the courses during the programme are too limited. I can only choose 3-4 courses every semestre, and many of them are compulsory. so I have little freedom to choose the course that I am interested in.» (Yes - probably)
- I do not believe the programme really trains you per se. I believe it"s up to you to actually train yourself. Also they offer no opportunities towards an internship with the industry or a chance to form connections there.» (Yes - probably)
- Though to get more specified in some area would be good, now the programme perhaps is a bit too wide. You get a small piece of many things. The paths (technical and business) could be more in-depth/specific) » (Yes - probably)
- Dont think there is another one that would suit me better...» (Yes - probably)
- I think there should be more time for the designstudios and less on small 7,5 p couses.» (Yes - probably)
- Mainly because of the possibility of working in the sector.» (Yes - probably)
- I would choose it again if those things i have complained about has been improved. I would probably choose other courses as well.» (Yes - probably)
- Fun, easy» (Yes - probably)
- teachers are very good. interesting courses and experiments. all of these even make me more like this programme. » (Yes - probably)
- I should have chosen the entrepreneur master instead because of their more hands-on approach. Also, I can"t say that I"m qualified for anything perticular when I graduate from the MEI programe, which could be put in parallell to for example the SCM programe...» (Yes - probably)
- Same programme, but I would tailor my course choices differently» (Yes - probably)
- But I"d rather not turn back time. It looks a lot better now!» (Yes - probably)
- At lest at Chalmers I think all are much the same.» (Yes - probably)
- This program is my main interest.» (Yes - probably)
- I"d maybe consider changing to Supply chain, but this programme is mostly what I expected so I"d probably choose it again.» (Yes - probably)
- the field is what i am interested in.» (Yes - probably)
- I value the programme as I find it important. » (Yes - probably)
- The program is targeting a very promising field, and all teachers are very open-minded and kind to a non-architacture background student like me. » (Yes - probably)
- The price of free is great. I like that the programme offers courses in some of the specialisations I was interested in. The multi-cultural atmosphere is nice.» (Yes - probably)
- I might try CSE instead.» (Yes - probably)
- Content extremely good. Very good external lecturers. It gives me a very good profile. Administration not so good.» (Yes - probably)
- Courses interested in. Had however expected courses to give deeper knowledge and not contain so much repetition. » (Yes - probably)
- It"s good overall, despite some curriculum flaws. » (Yes - probably)
- The Others doesnt interest me» (Yes - probably)
- But I would definitely choose No when I was still in the program.» (Yes - probably)
- Beacuse it met my expectations partially.» (Yes - probably)
- I thought that the program should be more about the environment and not so much divided into different types of evaluating methods» (Yes - probably)
- I like it and it so useful.» (Yes - probably)
- Since I allways wanted to have a master in materials, but some of the elective courses i do regret taking.» (Yes - probably)
- This is what I want to study but I didn´,t realize how much reading and writing it needs. I´,m still very interested in this masters and I don´,t regret taking it but I thought it would be more calculations and more hands on experience. Use more of what I have studied in previous education.» (Yes - probably)
- I feel that I might have gained more deep knowledge within an area if I had continued to study in the same section as I did my bachelor. But my master program is very interesting.» (Yes - probably)
- It"s good.» (Yes - probably)
- because it is very difficult to get a job.» (Yes - probably)
- Good overview of the field.» (Yes - probably)
- Two courses that didn"t have the sufficient quality, FTS and MFD... And I took a elective curse in risk management and safety, worst course I have ever read, it should be removed...» (Yes - probably)
- I think it is very interesting» (Yes)
- Because this is the most interesting one ,)» (Yes)
- I think this programme has developed and complemented my skills that i"ve attained during the bachelor.» (Yes)
- IT has been really interesting and I think that I have a good chance to get a job after it.» (Yes)
- Interesting subjects, good job opportunities» (Yes)
- The IDE master program is amazing and I got more than I had expected. But if a very big amout of tuition fee is charged, then I need to consider.» (Yes)
- But I"d have taken additional courses.» (Yes)
- I feel it teaches the fundamentals that is usefull in every engineering discipline. Also it is interesting and funny.» (Yes)
- Like its name, a management course in construction project» (Yes)
- However, some of the mandatory courses are quite worthless, either because of the teachers or because of their general make up. For instance the "Data acquisition and handling in systems biology"-course is disturbingly poorly managed and performed, too many teachers with either low english skills or none. There is also the "Bioreactors - design and control" with good teachers but the workload is completely rediculus in conjunction with some other courses taken simultaneously as well as there being barely no help offered what so ever for some critical parts of the course. » (Yes)
- It"s what I want to work with.» (Yes)
- It is a great program which include courses within the energy field that prepare you alot for the world within energy. » (Yes)
- It"s what I"d expected and that"s great!» (Yes)
- i really liked the track courses (tissue engineering/biomaterials) but some of the mandatory courses didn"t give me anything. » (Yes)
- I would choose it since it changes to include astrophysics more» (Yes)
- It was very interesting, easy, and as I have perceived it so far, my competence is thought highly of by future employers. However, I believe it was too easy and sounds more fancy than it is... Nothing bad to me at the moment, but the reputation of the programme may decline if everyone found out how low the standard is. » (Yes)
- it gives both structural knowledge as well as good knowledge in installation and building physics. It also gives a change to work with architects» (Yes)
- + I have worked for a year and this master program has already, as far as what I have seen, very good reputation and hence it opens a lot of interesting doors.» (Yes)
- It gave a deep and useful knowledge throughout the field that I studied» (Yes)
- But I am also interested in IPM» (Yes)
- Many good teatchers and students/frends» (Yes)
- The teachers and courses are excelllent at the MEI programme!» (Yes)
- It have learnt so many good things and gotten a very useful perspective, both on my bachelor field but also on the field the programme teaches.» (Yes)
- Computer Security is Definitely the area in which I want to start my professional career» (Yes)
- It is the field I am interested in.» (Yes)
- My bachelor degree programme is Information technology. We studied programming languages and information communications. Master degree is software engineering and technology. It deepens my previous study and show how to manage the software production process. They connect each other very well.» (Yes)
- I learned a lot here. » (Yes)
- This has easily been the best experience I"ve had so far on this school» (Yes)
- I find that it is precisely what I was hoping for: A program which gives deep insight into the mathematical background and low-level details of computer science and programming languages.» (Yes)
- It is overall a good programm and has lived up to my expectations. My field of interest. » (Yes)
- It was fun, challenging, broad and there is a great demand for labour with this background» (Yes)
- want to get deeper in this field» (Yes)
- I have the same field of interest in BSc and have experience in the field so it will be best towards my professional goals» (Yes)
- There is a great corporation between Chalmers and industrial companies.» (Yes)
- För att det är väldigt intressanta ämnen som tas upp och de allra flesta kurserna var väldigt bra.» (Yes)
- I choose between Networks and distributed systems, and Security and dependable systems. I think those have been merged now. Probably a good thing.» (Yes)
- I do definitely like my program and the content that this program can provide me at Chalmers.» (Yes)
- It includes what i expected, and is focused on more than technical aspects.» (Yes)
- Its very practical, future oriented, thoroughly planned, broadens my network. » (Yes)
- It is pretty much what i expected.» (Yes)
- It has pretty much lives up to my expectations which was quite high. I also like the fact that you cant pass the courses unless you understand them. It has given me knowledge that i was seeking» (Yes)
- It is very innovative program covering many areas not covered by home university even in the master level.» (Yes)
- It"s the best!» (Yes)
- cause it gave me a very good base for my future work. » (Yes)
- It"s very practical for both research area and industrial area.» (Yes)
- I like my program more than students from other programs seem to like theirs.» (Yes)
- It is the program at Chalmers that best fits my interests. It is a bit light on algorithms though.» (Yes)
- it`s open, project based, no exam» (Yes)
- I want to work with what I"ve learned in my master"s programme. » (Yes)
- There is no better option.» (Yes)
- most of the classes are really good!» (Yes)
- Very interesting courses, good teachers» (Yes)
- Even though the program hasn"t met my expectations it is what i intend to work with when I am finished.» (Yes)
- This programme thought me a lot of knowledge which this expertise requires. I belive that I"ve learnt a lot.» (Yes)
- I learnt a lot and it gave öe excellent tools for my upcoming careers» (Yes)
- - Interseting courses - Large opportunity to chose optional courses » (Yes)
- My opinion is that this Master programme teaches the most interesting field » (Yes)
- It is the programme which is most at line with my interests.» (Yes)
- det är mycket bra» (Yes)
- Interesting subjects.» (Yes)
- Very helpful teachers and great research atmosphere.» (Yes)
- I think it has also a very good side. And most of the classes have been good. But because workrelated matters I was not able to participate with my "own" class so I had to take the next ones, and the class was not expirienced, fresh students with nothing else to do thinking that they are good in shipping and without any work experience.» (Yes)
- I like distributed systems» (Yes)
- the only problem is the classrooms and the lack of ventilation, » (Yes)
- Mostly beacuse of the labour market and intress about the technloogy not beacuse of the progamme itself.» (Yes)
- Definitely !» (Yes)
- It fulfilled my expectations. » (Yes)
- Doesn"t seem like it gives me much of a chance to find a job in Sweden.» (No opinion)

36. What should definitely be preserved in your Masters programme?