ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ARK165 Design process vt2011, ARK165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-30 - 2011-04-20
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Inga Malmqvist»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

8 svarande

Very insufficient»1 12%
Insufficient»1 12%
Sufficient»6 75%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.62

2. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

8 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»1 12%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.87

Education and course administration

3. What is your opinion on the lectures?

8 svarande

Not sufficient»1 12%
Sufficient»4 50%
Good»3 37%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Lecture with lelle and people with knowledge from festival where very interesting but many of the other lectures where difficult to see the purpose with.» (Sufficient)
- Didn"t always feel relevant to the course. » (Good)

4. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

8 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»5 62%
Rather big»3 37%
Very big»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.37

5. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 25%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»1 12%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Change of information very often for example the schedual was changed 5 times. The archtechts seduale were not coordinated with the course and the engineers schedual. Things to improve until next year.» (Rather bad)
- messy, a lot of changes the last minutes. Of course this is okey in the reality but not when you have other courses,» (Rather bad)

Work environment

6. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 12%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»1 12%
I have not asked for assistance»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- it usualy took a long time» (Rather bad)
- Had good oportunities for asking questions and to get assistance.» (Very well)

7. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 12%
Rather good»1 12%
Very good»6 75%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Due to the bad coordination with the architects schedual one of them attended 3 time during the other one attended just a few more times. Finding time for meetings between engineers and architects where really difficult.» (Rather bad)

Concluding questions

8. What is your overall opinion of the course?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 12%
Passed»1 12%
Good»5 62%
Very good»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Intresting with a hands-on course, but very very messy. information etc» (Passed)
- But room for improvement!» (Good)

9. What should be preserved next year?

- "real life" project»
- Connection to real-life project»
- To work in project with teams combining architects and engineers was good. The project was also good and interesting and made me wanna learn.»
- different teams that need to interact»
- A real project, very intresting.»
- Group project. I think it is great to be involved in such kind of assignment and practice our skills in a real project.»
- The way of working. »

10. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- there should be more relevant lectures, maybe project should be more design (construction project design)related»
- Clarified processes to pinpoint responsibilities. »
- Coordinate with both architects and DCPM.»
- its popobly best to do a fake project in stead so we dont have to worry about making problems for the festival when we ask others for information(other companies)»
- the administration, sometimes it felt like the PM groups where responsible for the course.»
- The information about the project should be more sufficient from the early period so students do not feel losing their way and do not know what exactly they have to do. »
- Some of the lectures. »

11. Other comments

- Really like to work in the project as we did in this course but there is some technical things which includes the coordination of the course and also about scheduals. Changed schecual 5 times is a bit to many.»
- The first lecutre wasnt announced in timeedit and therefore nearly half of the class missed that lecture. So next time you should have done a short recap of the goals etc.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från