Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Hybrid Vehicles and Control 2011, TME095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-29 - 2011-04-13
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Sven Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

30 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 16%
Around 20 hours/week»10 33%
Around 25 hours/week»11 36%
Around 30 hours/week»4 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- It was around 40 in the last week before the submission of the parallel hybrid» (Around 25 hours/week)
- it is a time consuming course and needs a lot of work» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

30 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»6 20%
75%»18 60%
100%»5 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- due to dyno time from cfs» (25%)
- Lectures don"t cover completely the material of the exams which forces to a lot of reading in the book which is expensive to buy.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

30 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»11 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- more lectures would be better» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

27 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»27 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 40%
Yes, definitely»15 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- The solutions for the control part have to be explained. Everybody got a 0 for question 2 in the controls part and we need to know WHY?» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 23%
Large extent»20 66%
Great extent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

7. What did you think about the different lecturers/teachers?


Sven Andersson
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»1 3%
Good»9 30%
Very good»19 63%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.53

Daniel Härensten
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 10%
Good»15 51%
Very good»11 37%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.27

Anders Grauers
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»6 27%
Good»15 68%
Very good»1 4%
No opinion»8

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Bo Egardt
30 svarande

Very poor»2 7%
Poor»2 7%
OK»4 15%
Good»16 61%
Very good»2 7%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Jonas Fredriksson
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»6 25%
Good»13 54%
Very good»5 20%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.95

Torbjörn Thiringer
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 8%
OK»5 20%
Good»14 58%
Very good»3 12%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Jens Groot
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»6 27%
Good»13 59%
Very good»3 13%
No opinion»8

Genomsnitt: 3.86

8. What did you think about the assignments?


- Assignment 2 was really challenging one. I love it.»
- Maybe it will be useful to have some feedback about the assignment 1.»

Assignment 1
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»4 13%
Good»13 43%
Very good»13 43%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Assignment 2
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»14 46%
Very good»16 53%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.53

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»3 10%
Some extent»9 30%
Large extent»13 43%
Great extent»5 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The book is the most difficult-to-read book I have ever read in my life. Very easy concepts are conveyed in the most difficult manner possible.» (Small extent)
- The book is a little too mathematical for a mechanical engineer I feel» (Some extent)
- book is necessary to accomplish in this course and not everyone can afford having it» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

30 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»18 60%
Very well»12 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 31%
Very good»20 68%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

30 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»9 30%
Very well»20 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- students from different departments who take this course find it difficult to join groups since most of the class comes from a certain department and already know each others» (Rather poorly)

13. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»22 75%
High»6 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

14. How was the total workload this study period?

30 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 10%
Adequate»14 46%
High»10 33%
Too high»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Formula student!» (Too high)
- when cfs is taken into account ,)» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»3 10%
Good»19 63%
Excellent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- I enjoyed the course and wish I could have spent more time on it. Daniel and Sven are great people.» (Good)
- Very practical and interesting Automotive Engineering subject.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignment 2 (practical learning)»
- The amount pf practical lessons»
- Sven Andersson»
- The 2nd Assignment»
- assignment 1»
- Assignments»
- Assignments were really good»
- assignments are good but assignment 2 was too long»
- an assignment similar to the 2nd one.»
- Many computer exerises!»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- some real time hybrid systems can be demonstrated via videos or exhibits, so that even more clear picture could be obtained.»
- Matlab guidance should be given more attention.»
- I think more clear vehicle structure introduction will help students from other programmes understand better how the hybrid control is implemented in hybrid vehicle.»
- assignment 2 could be more clearer»
- Control theory lectures are too complex and they do not cover the details of the control algorithm. It is mostly the philosophy described rather than the application. Also the book should definitely be changed since it makes the subject so complicated to understand. »
- GUEST LECTURES FROM THE INDUSTRY PLEEEEASE.. I would really like to know what strategies they use in the different companies..not the whole algorithm of course but just the general outline so that I know if what I have done and learnt is useful or not and if it is useful then how?»
- assignment 2 should be shorter»

18. Additional comments

- Awesome course. Some real time exposure by visiting companies would add credit to knowledge.»
- Very intresting course! »
- I enjoyed the course and the helpful teachers.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från