ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GIS VT2011, VVT105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-25 - 2011-04-06
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Emma Fritzell»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 37%
Around 20 hours/week»11 45%
Around 25 hours/week»3 12%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»5 20%
75%»9 37%
100%»9 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

After this course you shall:

•, know basic terminology and important concepts within GIS
•, understand the construction and properties of different systems
•, have knowledge of different data sources and different forms of data collection, digitizing, control, storage, transfer and output and presentation of position bound data
•, know about the content of different geographic databases and their availability
•, know different forms of data structures for vector and raster data
•, know different forms of modeling and analysis of data
•, know the difference between a model and the real world
•, understand the concept and the importance of data quality
•, be able to apply different methods for interpolation and data interpretation
•, be able to apply SQL for specific searches in databases
•, be able to apply geocoding
•, know the basics of MapInfo and ArcGIS
•, on your own be able to make analyses with MapInfo and ArcGIS
•, know some different applications for use of GIS in engineering problems

3. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- But we did not meet all the goals stated» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

- But the course didn"t cover all the goals set» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»14 60%
Yes, definitely»7 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.34

- Some of the questions were unfair to be presented on exams» (No, not at all)
- The questions on the exam seemed randomly chosen from the book and did not reflect the goals. Specificly the DRASTIC question didn´,t seem to have anything to do with the core of the course. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»14 63%
Large extent»5 22%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- It could have done better» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»3 13%
Some extent»9 39%
Large extent»9 39%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

- didn"t buy the book» (Small extent)
- the book is too basic» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»3 13%
Rather badly»3 13%
Rather well»14 60%
Very well»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- we did never get our 2 gb for the home catalouge » (Very badly)
- For some handouts I had to look in archived course homepages. » (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 39%
Very good»13 56%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- There should be tutors in the computer rooms at every computer excercise » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»1 4%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 34%
Very well»14 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

11. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»2 8%
Low»11 47%
Adequate»9 39%
High»1 4%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.39

- I think it was very bad that the last assignment was taken away. It felt like we didn´,t got to learn enough on the first ArcGIS assignment. » (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»5 21%
Adequate»15 65%
High»3 13%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- But then I studied 175%» (Adequate)
- I studied three courses » (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»3 13%
Fair»2 8%
Adequate»8 34%
Good»7 30%
Excellent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignments »
- Computerexercises»
- the assignments»
- Computer exercise»
- computer exercises»
- The MapInfo assignment»
- Exericises, but make the ArcGIS ex more like the one for MapInfo. A larger project.»
- Three tutors in the computer room»
- The practical GIS applications»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe some lecture slids could be provides rather than just pictures from the book. »
- that guest lecture about modelling of the latest ice age was kind of not so good.»
- more presentation on GIS softwares, and it is assigned more marks, and more exercise on GIS softwares would be good. »
- One ArcGIS assignment like the one we did and another one where we can make an analysis on our own and not just follow steps in a manual.»
- More computer exercises in Mapinfo, but especially more in ArcGIS, to learn more about the programs.»
- Lectures. I did not got much there.»
- Way of evaluation, fairly more weighting should be given to practical exercises. »

16. Additional comments

- The excercise is good but easily to be forgotten.»
- Rather easy course load. Book was just an introduction. The lab work/assignments was way too easy for the course at masters level. more problems should be solved in the class. »
- Nothing Much»

Kursutvärderingssystem från