ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Production logistics 2011, TEK240

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-24 - 2011-04-30
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Anna Fredriksson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»11 45%
At most 20 hours/week»3 12%
At most 25 hours/week»7 29%
At most 30 hours/week»2 8%
At most 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- Not so much in the beginning but last weeks over 8h/day» (At most 25 hours/week)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (At most 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»0 0%
50%»5 21%
75%»11 47%
100%»6 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (50%)
- Lectures with Mats was ok, not that inspiring, but a good addition to the book» (75%)

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 39%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- It"s just that the goals and words could be hard to understand before you have taken the course. That is simply an obstacle but perhaps not a problem.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

23 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»21 91%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

- Too low level on this course» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination asses whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»12 54%
Yes, definitely»9 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (To some extent)

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help of your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»5 21%
Some extent»10 43%
Large extent»8 34%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- In general it"s quite impossible for anybody (lecturer) to teach me, I just have to teach myself.» (Some extent)
- Mainly reading the book over and over again is the best tip (for the basic stuff in the course). Everything is there and it is described thoroughly» (Some extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Some extent)
- frankly, solving the problems in class taught us much about the subject compared to the lectures» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»8 34%
Large extent»9 39%
Great extent»5 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- the literature is hard to understand and read. it is too much detail» (Some extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Large extent)
- Great book, easy to understand!» (Great extent)
- Really good! Mainly reading the book over and over again is the best tip (for the basic stuff in the course). Everything is there and it is described thoroughly» (Great extent)

8. To what extent has the exercises been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»3 13%
Large extent»10 43%
Great extent»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- Except the teacher, who really needs a course in pedagogics. She was always confused and not structured at all, writing unimportant stuff down, skipping the important parts. She expected the students to know how she was thinking! There were always wrong calculations in the answers.» (Some extent)
- Well it helped understanding the questions which helped to understand the exam. You could learn on your own but it would probably be hard or you would miss a detail or two.» (Large extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Large extent)
- more exercises!» (Great extent)
- Anna is a very good teacher in this area, pedagogic and explanatory! » (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»14 60%
Very well»7 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- I"m saying bad since I know it can be better. I know I have high standards (like many others) but waiting a couple of days to get the lecture slides is considered as inconvenient.» (Rather badly)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Rather well)
- Great to have solutions to all exercises on the homepage» (Very well)

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»2 8%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 21%
Very good»14 60%
I did not seek help»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- When you asked Mats about calculations he simply didn"t answer. Anna gave quick answers by email, but they didn"t help at all and she was gone when you needed help the most, during the exam week.» (Very poor)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Rather good)
- the course assistant was just great!» (Very good)

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»3 13%
Low»4 18%
Adequate»13 59%
High»2 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Low)
- Low workload per credit compared to courses in my own university.» (Adequate)

12. To what extent have the guest lecture by Dr. Roger Lindau helped you understand the subject?

22 svarande

Small extent»6 27%
Some extent»10 45%
Large extent»6 27%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- who was that...?» (Some extent)
- Motivating and inspiring, did not actually say that much of importance rather than stating how it was on different places. That itself was not too interesting. Though Lindau woke an interest for working with this afterwards.» (Some extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Large extent)

13. To what extent have the guest lecture by Dr. Mattias Hellner helped you understand the subject?

22 svarande

Small extent»5 22%
Some extent»12 54%
Large extent»4 18%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- maybe...dont remember» (Some extent)
- Motivating and honest, told us how it really was and that gave clarity.» (Some extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Some extent)

14. To what extent have the guest lecture by Peter Cedergårdh helped you understand the subject?

21 svarande

Small extent»5 23%
Some extent»11 52%
Large extent»4 19%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- He was the worst of them all. No red-line, subject didnt make sense, inspiration factor 0. Remove him to next year.» (Small extent)
- idk... the guest lectures were in general pretty good, always good to have ppl from "real working life" to talk abt their experiences» (Some extent)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Some extent)

15. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»4 17%
Fair»4 17%
Adequate»4 17%
Good»10 43%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3

- to much individual work, it was hard to get motivated to study when there was too little to do.» (Poor)
- I liked the material, but the classes where very dry in my opinion. More examples from industry would be prefered.» (Poor)
- I had greater expectations» (Poor)
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!» (Fair)
- I didnt know so much about logistict before this but now I know quite much» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course »
- The excersises was quite good»
- exercises and at least some gues lectures»
- sdf»
- Anna»
- exercise practice is really good.»
- The book, the 4 level model that everythings is based on, knowing models their characteristics and enviroments, calculations etc should be what is expected of us. I saw that late in the course but realized how smart it really was to have those goals.»
- Guest lectures»
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- practical visit to comanies concerning the course»
- More to do, i would be easier to learn then. maybe some groupwork, excersises to hand in or something similar. »
- I was unable to participate in one guest lecture which I could/had to compensate by reading a very long research report which took over 2 days for me to really understand and summarize. This felt like a very hard "punishment" for missing the lecture, taking into consideration that it would have been only 2h where I could have been sleeping or doing other things! Of course doing extra work is natural for missing an obligatory lecture but this was definitely too much.»
- daf»
- the book is not easy to understand and a little bit boring.»
- the literature»
- Remove Cedergård, be slightly better with facit to exercises, let Mats clearly state what is expected of us in this course (If you learn this, this and this it"s ok...).»
- I don"t see any major change to be done»
- You should have the exercises as handins to force students to start studying in time. Lectures should point on where the students should focus the most. And exercises need to be more structured.»
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!»

18. Additional comments

- not really... thank you!»
- ad»
- I liked the course.»
- Great thikning! That really breaks the mold!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från