ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Dynamical systems spring 2011, TIF155

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-18 - 2011-04-12
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 6%
Kontaktperson: Stellan Östlund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»1 33%
Around 30 hours/week»1 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»1 33%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 33%
75%»1 33%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the homeworks assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»1 33%
To some extent»2 66%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

Teaching and course administration

6. Comparing take-home vs regular exam do you:

3 svarande

Much prefer regular exam»0 0%
Prefer regular exam»1 33%
Have no opinion»0 0%
Prefer take-home exam»1 33%
Much prefer take-home exam»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- This course would not be doable as a regular exam.» (Much prefer take-home exam)

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»2 66%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- The course literature "the book by Ott", should be changed I guess. There is no clarity of content and no mathematical rigor.» (Small extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- There was some inconvenience with the misprints in the 4th and 5th assignments.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 33%
Very good»1 33%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 66%
High»1 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Some assignments were a bit tedious, in the sense that though there was a large amount of computation required, it really didn"t help in understanding the subject matter. Questions should be framed which test understanding of the subject and not merely write some programs and obtain some plots.» (Adequate)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 66%
High»1 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think the teaching was somewhat erratic. It felt like Stellan was missing some coherence between the lectures. Also, I think he could have been more prepared for the lectures.» (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The study material (book by Edward Ott)»
- the exercise sheets should be written in more than 5 minutes so that it is possible to work properly with them»

17. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från