ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY055 Remote Sensing Sp3, 10/11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-18 - 2011-04-04
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»2 40%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 60%
100%»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- I did not go to the exercises» (75%)
- I missed two tutorial lectures. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I feel confusion on radar part a bit.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»3 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Strange, what i reviewed part does not appear in this exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Teachers are very kind preparing the handout materials before each lecture» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 25%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»2 40%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Luckily the courses what I selected do not overlap. I really appreciated! » (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»2 40%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Except I feel some confusions when doing the matlab project.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Labs and project The handout materials»
- good labs»
- Labs, matlab project.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Do not use power point PRESENTATIONS for next year. PPTs are not for teaching theory, they are made for non deep presentations. Of course the teaching can be supported with pictures and so on from ppt, but not soley based on them. And to use around 60 slides in one lecture is too much, compress and pick out the important stuff! You learn by using many using many senses at the same time (writing, listening and seeing). Another thing is also to specify good exercises in the book to do. »
- exercices should be problemsolving classes instead of lectures»

16. Additional comments

- I think it is better to set a deadline for the project submission before the exam. I suggest that the labs should be arranged as early as possible.Otherwise, quite a lot of labs and projects and reports from other courses gather together in the end of study period.I think that teachers coming from the course satellite positioning offer a good reference. Labs in satellite positioning courses are very early. Students collect rough data first and process and analysis later as the course going further. Maybe add some home assignments as bonus but not compulsive. Some videos may bring more vivid effects on lecture. »
- Also try to within the teachers keep track of what the other are saying and what notations they use so it all won"t be be mixed up.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från