Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Gameplay Design V11, TDA580

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-18 - 2011-03-27
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Jon Mjölnevik»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp

1. It was clear from the beginning what was expected of me in the course.

10 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2 20%
5 50%
4, Agree completely.»3 30%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- I think it was pretty clear from the beginning what the purpose and goal of the course was.» (3)
- It became clear after the first lecture and exercise.» (3)

2. Do you think that you had enough knowledge to take the course?

- Yes»
- Yes. Infact, I was positively surprised since I have not played a lot of games before.»
- Yes»
- Yes. I knew most games or could ask about them. Having followed "Interaction Design Methodology" was a great asset for the design lectures of this course.»
- Yes, but I am still bad at writing lenghty reports :)»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes!»

3. As a whole, how satisfied are you with the course?

- Very satisfied»
- Very. One of the most fun and interesting courses I"ve taken.»
- Satisfied, not impressed.»
- It was the best course I have taken in my whole university studies! Both at Chalmers and my home university!»
- The course was very fun, as well as very tedious with all report writing, but I improved quite a bit and learned alot. So I"m very satisfied.»
- I"am really glad i took the course. I had low expectation, but i learnt a lot. How i can use the knowledge i gain on other fields like movies, books and music. »
- Satisfied»
- Very satisfied, interesting content, good exercises, little too extensive writing assignments but the third one was the most fun thing in the whole education so far.»

4. Regarding lectures, seminars, projects, etc you have participated in: Please mention three good things in the course and three things that can be improved.

- The sequence and outline of the exercises/assignments are very good, lectures are fun and actives your mind. Very generous amount of time for supervision. Group-projects should be evaluated more individually, add an evaluation of groupmembers. Had some problems in my group where I carried most of the workload. »
- Good: The course book, the guest lectures, the Bad: Hard question, maybe that we did not get even a hint of feedback with the results. Not even a hint of what was expected.»
- Good: The GGJ-event makes it feel more professional. The lectures and information is very clear and easy to follow. The projects feels relevant. Improve: The feedback system is confusing, written feedback grading without physical presence and not behind locked doors would help. Exercises kind of unstructured, perhaps a more rewarding result such as a playable prototype would make it more concrete. Game project seems to be easier to carry out well if a simpler game type is chosen, either this could be changed or it could be more clear that the gamed idea should be limited.»
- Three good things: - Exercises are very useful to understand what is expected of us. - Supervisions are very useful to understand what is expected of us. - Lectures are very informative. Guest lectures are different and highlight special interesting stuff.»
- remove the no more, no less reports. reports are fine, but once all relative material is on the report, all that follows is unneccesary and boring to read. »
- Good structure, great teacher, good powerpoint presentations Little classroom, bad projector, should be able to book supervisions »
- Good: *Teaching on the Lectures *The feedback from feedback sessions *The content in the course Bad: *No feedback at all if not participating in these sessions (some basics could be given at least) *Subjective assessment on the exercises (hard to tell what is good and bad beforehand) *Instructions were sometimes a bit vague, one thing to improve this would be to set word intervals instead of saying 12 pages.»
- Good: examples and explanations at lectures, exercise that allows practicing for assignments, third assignment with whole development process Improve: feedback opportunities (at least some through mail?), too much to write (at least the last assignment), make time for elective assignment (since they"re needed for a 5)»

5. The information about the examinations was clear.

8 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
0 0%
2 25%
4, Agree completely.»6 75%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Well, the time of the deadlines was clear and often what we was supposed to do too, and when it was not, it was a hint that we should go talk to Staffan. I would like to know the criteria for the different grades though.» (3)
- It should be claimed from the beginning that supervision is an almost-mandatory step to take at the beginning of writing an assignment.» (3)

6. The information about schedules was good.

9 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
0 0%
6 66%
4, Agree completely.»3 33%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Once, when Staffan was sick, the information was displayed in a very short notice.» (3)
- The web page is not the best of designs but it was functional.» (3)

7. How did you experience the physical work environment?

- Good, even if the lectureroom was a but underdimensioned the first few lectures due to many participants»
- Good.»
- Lecture hall was too small. Otherwise the Lindholmen campus is generally a good environment to work in.»
- Not sure how to understand the question?!»
- great»
- Good!»

8. How did you experience the psychological work environment?

- No complaints»
- Good.»
- Good, ideas were encouraged and only constructive criticism given.»
- Not sure how to understand the question?!»
- great»
- Very good!»

9. The course literature such as books, articles, and compendia functioned as a good support in your studies.

8 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
4 50%
1 12%
4, Agree completely.»3 37%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- I didn"t buy the book, but I got a PDF version. The book is a really good lecture, but it is a shame to require buying it.» (2)
- Yes, but was only almost worth buying.» (2)
- They seemed interesting but I didn"t read much of it. It seemed kind of appropriate for beginners.» (3)
- Very good book!» (4, Agree completely.)

10. You have acquired the knowledge and skills specified in the goals of the course plan?

7 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
0 0%
3 50%
4, Agree completely.»3 50%
No answer.»1

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Yes, I think so.» (3)
- Don"t remember the goals.» (No answer.)

11. What do you think about the pedagogical abilities of the teachers? (Could they explain course content in a comprehensive way?)

- Very good»
- Yep.»
- Yes, the lecturer and the supervisors were pedagogical and mostly logical too.»
- Great, nothing to add.»
- Yes, the lectures in this course were awesome. »
- The teacher was great, clear, great presentations»
- I think it was good and comprehensive»
- They could listen more and try to understand what the students really mean (not jumping to conclusions that quickly etc).»

12. It was clear from the beginning what was expected of me in the course.

9 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2 25%
3 37%
4, Agree completely.»3 37%
No answer.»1

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- As the first question, but not quite sure of what was expected.» (2)
- Yep. » (4, Agree completely.)

Kursutvärderingssystem från