ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Interaction Design Project V11, TDA501

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-30 - 2011-06-06
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Jon Mjölnevik»

1. It was clear from the beginning what was expected of me in the course.

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 60%
4, Agree completely.»4 40%
No answer.»1

Genomsnitt: 3.4

2. Do you think that you had enough knowledge to take the course?

- Yes.»
- yes»
- yes»
- Yes.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes, since it was quite free what to do.»
- yes»
- Yes»

3. As a whole, how satisfied are you with the course?

- Somewhat.»
- Pretty satisfied»
- very interesting in this course!»
- Very satisfied.»
- Very. I liked that we had a lot of time, both in therms of hours and that it spanned over two quarters. »
- Very»
- Satisfied, got opportunities of arranging an exhibition apart from the own project which was an experience.»
- pretty ok. The workshops were a waste of time, it would be better to have more time on the actual project.»
- I am quite satisfied, the only thing I did not like was all the workshops in the beginning»

4. Regarding lectures, seminars, projects, etc you have participated in: Please mention three good things in the course and three things that can be improved.

- Good: *The project itself. *The exhibition. *The freedom to work whenever you can. Bad: *The lectures. *The workshops!!!! <--- Worst thing ever *That the course is mandatory for us game designers, but it is very oriented around the interaction design track.»
- Positive: Group size, freedom of choice, exhibition Negative: workshops exhibition too long more time on project»
- Good: Exhibition group work freedom Bad: Too many lectures at beginning ...»
- Good: Free project work, well-administrated exhibition, practical workshops Improve: Un-fuzzify workshops (clearer purpose), more game design-connected, more project-connected activities in common»
- The project from planning to execution was great. The workshops was more or less a repetition from earlier courses. You could be clearer and give feedback throughout the course, the grade for the individual essay we could have gotten earlier.»
- More focus on both tracks of the program. Better structure. The homepage is not very good.»

5. The information about the examinations was clear.

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»5 45%
4, Agree completely.»4 36%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 3.18

6. The information about schedules was good.

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»2 18%
4, Agree completely.»8 72%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- It wasn"t very clear that the initial workshops were mandatory.» (3)

7. How did you experience the physical work environment?

- Very good, the studios have been good to work in.»
- I would have preferred to work more at Lindholmen than from home, but that was a group things.. A corner of our own would of course have been nice. »
- Good»
- No complaints.»
- Well, sort of a mess as usual. But that"s ok. Sometimes hard to find things, but at the same time you dare to take material and try things out. »

8. How did you experience the psychological work environment?

- Good»
- No complaints.»
- Ok.»

9. The course literature such as books, articles, and compendia functioned as a good support in your studies.

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»3 27%
2»2 18%
3»5 45%
4, Agree completely.»1 9%
No answer.»0

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- As mentioned above, it was too interaction design track oriented. They hadn"t chosen any good course book for our type of project.» (1, Do not agree at all.)
- Not much information about the books. I didn"t read a work until I started writing the individual essay.» (1, Do not agree at all.)
- Didn"t use it too much, but good with different options.» (2)
- The previous course, gameplay design was a good support.» (2)
- More emphasis on the litterature would not hurt (I thought the things I read were very good and interesting).» (3)

10. You have acquired the knowledge and skills specified in the goals of the course plan?

10 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»1 12%
3»3 37%
4, Agree completely.»4 50%
No answer.»2

Genomsnitt: 3.37

11. What do you think about the teachers’, pedagogical abilities? (Could they explain course content in a comprehensive way?)

- sure»
- great!»
- Yes»
- Good, but could be more clear in exactly what to do etc.»
- Farshid and Amir are heros!»

12. Course structure, content and lessons has worked so that it has supported your learning.

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»7 63%
4, Agree completely.»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

- We had no use at all of the initial workshops.» (2)

13. The course website is a better alternative than Pingpong (GUL for GU students).

11 svarande

1, Do not agree at all.»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 9%
4, Agree completely.»10 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- PingPong sucks...anything is better than that.» (4, Agree completely.)
- Anything is better than pingpong. Information must be easily accessible, and not require logging in. » (4, Agree completely.)
- Since PingPong is close to the worst thing ever created.» (4, Agree completely.)

14. Please fill out any additional comments you might have about the course.

- Remove the essays, they fill no purpose at all.»
- I liked the theme. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från