Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Superconductivity and low-temperature physics, FMI036 MPNAN VT2011, FMI036
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-03-08 - 2011-03-26 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 6 | | 54% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 9% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.18 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 6 | | 54% |
100%» | | 5 | | 45% |
Genomsnitt: 4.45 - I missed one lecture» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 9% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 10 | | 90% |
Genomsnitt: 3.9 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 11 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 45% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 45% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - Maybe to less focus on the central problems.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 72% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.09 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.63 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 27% |
Very well» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 9% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 81% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 45% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 45% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 11. How was the course workload?10 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 80% |
High» | | 2 | | 20% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - I liked the idea with weakly exercises and with deadlines to them. It helped me a lot to better understand current lectures » (Adequate)
12. How was the total workload this study period?10 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 70% |
High» | | 3 | | 30% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3
Course specific questions13. How well was the lecturer prepared, in your opinion?11 svarande
very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
well» | | 4 | | 36% |
very well» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 4.63 - Both Per and Alex delivered interesting lectures, they were very well prepared, and Alex was very passionate about his lectures, which I liked very much.» (very well)
14. How did you like the lectures?11 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
medium» | | 1 | | 9% |
rather good» | | 6 | | 54% |
excellent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 4.27 15. How did you like the laboratory exercises?11 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 1 | | 9% |
medium» | | 6 | | 54% |
rather good» | | 2 | | 18% |
excellent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 - I believe the time for Labs should be more and we should be able to work with instrument ourselves under supervision, so the number of student in each lab session should be less.» (medium)
- I liked how both Samuel and Arsalan explained the goals and theory of the labs. They spoke a bit differently than Per, and it again helped me for better understanding of the course material.» (excellent)
16. How did you like the course home page?11 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
medium» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather good» | | 5 | | 45% |
excellent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 4.54 - Course homepage was very well organised, easy to find everything, with all information needed » (excellent)
17. How did you like the lecture notes?11 svarande
very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
medium» | | 2 | | 18% |
rather good» | | 7 | | 63% |
excellent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - Lecture notes were good and understandable, but sometimes (very few) I couldn"t understand handwriting, but overall they were fine!» (rather good)
Summarizing questions18. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 8 | | 72% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 4.27 - I"m happy that I chose this course, lectures were very interesting, and the course was very well organised.» (Excellent)
19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The course outline should definitely be preserved to next year. »
- Rather than power point presentations, using blackboard for teaching should be preserved. By that I guess students can get more in to the memory.»
- Exercises, labs»
- The kectures on the board »
- Labs and hand-ins.»
- - combination of lectures and excercises»
20. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Extra Laboratories may be included for the next year. »
- If there are tutorial discussions it would be fine.»
- The laborations should be better organized »
- - the labs => shorter and with smaller groups»
- Lab exercises ax I explained.»
21. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|