ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Laser Engineering, MCC051, MPMPE, VT2011, MCC051

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-08 - 2011-03-26
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 50%
Around 20 hours/week»2 50%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 50%
100%»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 50%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 100%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Course specific questions

13. Please comment specifically on the lectures.

- Very good lectures. Only negative I can see is that sometimes the overhead with 2 pages of formulas and just rushing trough the derivations was quite boring. »

14. Please comment specifically on the tutorial classes.

- Very good tutorials. Could have been a couple of more tutorials. »

15. Please comment specifically on the labs.

- Quite good. But some more help/explanations during the second lab could have been good.»
- Very good, gave some practical insight to the theory in the lectures. »

16. Please comment specifically on the study visits.

- Very good - interesting, relevant and all having to do with different aspects of the course.»
- not very useful»

17. Please comment specifically on the applications project.

- Good, but difficult to keep so short.»
- good to link the theory to the applications»

18. Please comment specifically on the home assignments.

- Very good for learning. Was a bit frustrating that you had to do a lot of assumptions on the second home assignment was so confusing that the TA couldn"t help directly with it. Otherwise good. »
- Good level of difficulty and length.»
- good occasion to review the course notes»

19. Please comment specifically on the MUD card system.

- A nice way to get some communications between the lecturer and the class.»
- Good idea, but I personally prefer to just ask the questions directly when I think of them. »
- ok»

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»1 25%
Excellent»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Most of it!»

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe do the "boring" derivations on the board instead of just pointing at stuff on a overhead. »
- The study visits are not really useful»

23. Additional comments

- To get more good questions at the application project presentations it could have been good that each person got to read another report and prepare some questions on the subject before the presentation»

Kursutvärderingssystem från