Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Active Microwave Circuits, EME101, MPMPE, VT2011, EME101

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-08 - 2011-03-26
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 73%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»6 42%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»2 14%
At least 35 hours/week»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- During the homeassigment tasks and the pre-lab the number of hours spend was around 30 hours.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»4 28%
100%»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- Just couldn"t attend to some courses due to overlapping with another course.» (75%)
- I might have missed 2 or 3 lectures.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Maybe less semiconductor part» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- But when the course "foundations of microwave engineering" is so poorly tutored many of the student (including me) lack important knowledge. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 21%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The examination covered pretty well the contents of the curse.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»10 71%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The best teaching so far at wireless and photonics» (Large extent)
- The tutorials are well organized and structured. They are a good complement to the theroy. » (Large extent)
- The lectures where good and the visit to Ericsson was pretty good since we were able to see how the things that we are learning are applied in the "real" world» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- The book by González is probably the most useful I have found during the Master"s Programme. It is very clear and it is well connected to the exercises and examples presented in class. » (Great extent)
- We just missed a reference book for final themes.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»8 57%
Very well»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- I would suggest that the slides are uploaded before the lectures and not after. It is understandable that the lecturer might want to correct some mistakes in the slides, but sometimes it is difficult to follow the details of the explanations without the lecture printed on paper. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 14%
Very good»12 85%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Students were constantly encouraged to ask questions, and these were well answered.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»10 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- We had a guy who actually didn"t do much effort as we did for the second assignment» (Rather well)
- Collaboration was necessary for the project writing and presentation, as well as for the lab. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 71%
High»4 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- It is good with high workload!» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 28%
High»7 50%
Too high»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- In combination with computational electromagnetics this period is quite heavy. » (High)
- Some courses actually collided in some time slots. Therefore, it was difficult to follow both. » (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»11 78%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- It was a good course. The lab was OK and the tutorial were good, there were just sometimes where the tutorials were slow.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- David Gustafsson»
- The project and lab for this course is very good part. I really like those two.»
- David as a teacher for the exercises!! »
- The tutorials are extremely useful for learning purposes and the Teacher Assistant is very good. The home assignments, which are very helpful for understanding the main concepts. »
- The company visit. The homeassignment was demanding but it was a good way to learn.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Try not to fit the lab during lunch hours.»
- The teaching in the foundations for microwave course, so that the students will have better knowledge going in to this course!!» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. Additional comments

- Thanks to everyone of this course»
- A good course. The best so far at wireless and photonics due to Jan and David.»
- David was greatly helpful when asking some questions about problems and lectures.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från