Visa resultat

Diagnostic imaging, SSY185, vt11

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 20 hours/week»		8		57%
Around 25 hours/week»		3		21%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		3		21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		1		7%
75%»		9		64%
100%»		4		28%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- Good variation of speakers and teachers.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		3		21%
The goals are difficult to understand»		1		7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		4		28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		6		42%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- I can"t remember seeing any goals. They should probably be more clearly presented. Some form of course-PM should preferably be handed out the first lecture.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The course spans so many subjects, it would be good to no exactly how deep we will dig in to each subject.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		11		91%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		3		25%
To some extent»		2		16%
Yes, definitely»		3		25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		4		33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- some of the questions were weekly designed!! some of them were not discussed during the course properly.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		4		28%
Some extent»		7		50%
Large extent»		2		14%
Great extent»		1		7%

Genomsnitt: 2

- the teaching was too poor. the teacher only read the material from the slides!! no further explanation at all!! in practice, it did not make any difference that a student studies at home or attend the lectures. » (Small extent)
- Too oriented towards equations, which would be ok if not all modalities were discribed this way. Maybe only a few central methods should be selected and covered more extensively.» (Some extent)
- Depending on lecturer» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		14%
Some extent»		5		35%
Large extent»		4		28%
Great extent»		3		21%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- The book was very thorough on most subjects» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		7%
Rather well»		8		57%
Very well»		5		35%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- We did not recieve any course-pm» (Rather well)
- It worked, no more, no less.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		7%
Rather good»		7		50%
Very good»		6		42%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Good availability and flexibility.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		7%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		3		21%
Very well»		10		71%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- the cooperation was good. there was an assessment of peers performance. I totally believe they should have been performed anonymously. But unfortunately the details of evaluation results were shown to everyone. After revealing the results, I got sure that some of the assessments were not fair at all in some cases! » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		35%
High»		5		35%
Too high»		4		28%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- Microwave tomography lab was too much work compared to what you get from it.» (Too high)
- the course load was too high. over 27 lecture materials. approximately 1200 slides were taught. This amount of material needed two periods to be taught!! the teachers could reduce the materials and instead less materials could be taught more specifically and deeply.» (Too high)
- 2 project and a lab especially the lab was time consuming and the works didn"t have good knowledge i means we put a lot of time but the efficiency is very low i think it have to be changed all the stuffs in the lab, in this case it is not useful» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		6		42%
High»		6		42%
Too high»		2		14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- I have other course which had a high amount of workload too.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		2		14%
Fair»		3		21%
Adequate»		5		35%
Good»		2		14%
Excellent»		2		14%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- I was not convinced the the whole course teaching method. I think this course is one of the most important courses of biomedical engineering but the way it was presented was so weak. we need a better teacher!!!» (Poor)
- The course has potential but is too general in many areas and would probably benefit from selecting only a few imaging techinques and go through them thoroughly, only briefly mentioning others.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments