Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Diagnostic imaging, SSY185, vt11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-07 - 2011-03-20
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»8 57%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»9 64%
100%»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- Good variation of speakers and teachers.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- I can"t remember seeing any goals. They should probably be more clearly presented. Some form of course-PM should preferably be handed out the first lecture.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The course spans so many subjects, it would be good to no exactly how deep we will dig in to each subject.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»3 25%
To some extent»2 16%
Yes, definitely»3 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- some of the questions were weekly designed!! some of them were not discussed during the course properly.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»4 28%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2

- the teaching was too poor. the teacher only read the material from the slides!! no further explanation at all!! in practice, it did not make any difference that a student studies at home or attend the lectures. » (Small extent)
- Too oriented towards equations, which would be ok if not all modalities were discribed this way. Maybe only a few central methods should be selected and covered more extensively.» (Some extent)
- Depending on lecturer» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- The book was very thorough on most subjects» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»8 57%
Very well»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- We did not recieve any course-pm» (Rather well)
- It worked, no more, no less.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»7 50%
Very good»6 42%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Good availability and flexibility.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»10 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- the cooperation was good. there was an assessment of peers performance. I totally believe they should have been performed anonymously. But unfortunately the details of evaluation results were shown to everyone. After revealing the results, I got sure that some of the assessments were not fair at all in some cases! » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 35%
High»5 35%
Too high»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- Microwave tomography lab was too much work compared to what you get from it.» (Too high)
- the course load was too high. over 27 lecture materials. approximately 1200 slides were taught. This amount of material needed two periods to be taught!! the teachers could reduce the materials and instead less materials could be taught more specifically and deeply.» (Too high)
- 2 project and a lab especially the lab was time consuming and the works didn"t have good knowledge i means we put a lot of time but the efficiency is very low i think it have to be changed all the stuffs in the lab, in this case it is not useful» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 42%
High»6 42%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- I have other course which had a high amount of workload too.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»2 14%
Fair»3 21%
Adequate»5 35%
Good»2 14%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- I was not convinced the the whole course teaching method. I think this course is one of the most important courses of biomedical engineering but the way it was presented was so weak. we need a better teacher!!!» (Poor)
- The course has potential but is too general in many areas and would probably benefit from selecting only a few imaging techinques and go through them thoroughly, only briefly mentioning others.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Guest lectures.»
- nothing»
- All the guest lectures.»
- the two projects seemed well!»
- all»
- Everything except microwave tomography»
- The MRI lectures by Göran and the variation of guest lectures-»
- CT exercise.»
- Guest lectures was the best part of the course which I think must be preserved during the next years.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Since the subjects of this course could be the main area of biomedical for future so I expected a better teaching team and better quality. so I think it would be better to improve the team and try to focus in some important parts instead of having many guest lecturers without enough time for them to explain. Basically, they just go through a lot slides without enough explanation.»
- The laboration-pm could be more instructive. Some assignments were hard to understand.»
- nothing»
- Microwave tomography lab»
- Change the MT-lab so it focuses more on analysis than measurement.»
- The teaching method should be completely changed. less material but more deep study!! It teacher should do more than just reading the slides for us. the labs were not satisfying at all. we had a very bad interface to work with I mean notepad. the teacher at least could take some time and make an interface for that. it was really time consuming. with a could interface the students could both understand better and spend less time to learn the materials. »
- lab»
- Microwave tomography maybe»
- The MW lab needs to be reworked, it is hard to see the pedagogical and analytical points of the exercise. It"s not really beneficial to run simulations for hours.»
- I think the closed book examination for such a course like Diagnostic Imaging is ridiculous,there is no advantage with closed book examination as you will forget everything which have remembered,I"m really agreed with open book exams which is based on understandings during the course !»

16. Additional comments

- I think it is a bit odd that not the entire project group could do the presentation of project 2.»
- correction of homeworks aren"t judgement and too tough »
- not now maybe»
- No more comment !»

Kursutvärderingssystem från