Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Atmospheric measurements 1, KMG055, MPEMA, Vt11, KMG055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-11 - 2011-03-25
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 91%
Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 45%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»2 18%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 18%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 36%
100%»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- That is, more precise» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Except from some parts which is really theoretical (about measurements etc) and not that much explained. There are some quite heavy material presented very briefly at lectures. E.g. about particle counting and analysis. In my view, either you present the material and have the goal that the students should understand the theory, or you don"t present the heavy theory at all, but mention it in a more simplified way (which I understood was the intention, to give an overview over techniques)» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 9%
To some extent»7 63%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- I think it was to many questions on the same topic. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- The course literature was almost unnecessary. I"m glad I did not spend 650 sek on a book I didn"t use in the end.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- I think you should try to hand out lab-pm etc. before labs.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»10 90%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»5 45%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- for one of the labs, the groups were too large, it"s more easily administrated and you also learn more if the groups are smaller. three persons are more manageable. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»10 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»7 63%
High»2 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- multi cultural. Very useful.»
- tha labs! it"s great to have the opportunity to get practical knowledge of how to perform measurements and analyses. also the multicultural project was interesting.»
- project work, organisation of lab sessions»
- Lab work»
- I think every thing was done very well, you learnt alot on the lab sessions which helped me much in my learning. It is nice to do labs when you can focus on learning instead of on writing a good report. Multicultural report was also very good way of getting good understanding of the air issues.»
- Practical work»
- Way of teaching and course literature.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- perhaps the lab when we went out to measure particles onsite and having a hypothesis could have been earlier in the course?»
- The exam should be more focused on the theme of this course "atmospheric measurement"»
- More practical work»
- Nothing.»

16. Additional comments

- The teacher is kind and helpful»

Kursutvärderingssystem från