Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Astroparticle Physics, FKA175

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-02-28 - 2011-03-28
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 33%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- It seems better in the new course description in the student portal.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- One could possibly try to fit a bit more material into the course, but looking at later chapters in the book I am not sure how it could be done. Chapters 5-6 seem mainly focused at developing the mathematics that is to be used in later chapters, and probably aren"t too much fun on their own. Ch. 9 on gravitational lensing could maybe stand on its own.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Have not had the final exam yet, but the problems are very good indeed!» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good, interesting and structured lectures.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Course literature is good as a complement to lectures.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 66%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»2 66%
I did not seek cooperation»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 66%
Adequate»1 33%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

12. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 33%
Too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Unfortunately, this course have not received as much time as the QFT course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 66%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- Very nice course, interesting material and gives a great background and basic knowledge of cosmology.» (Excellent)

14. What should be preserved to next year?

- I think the book is, in most parts, very good and should be preserved.»

15. What should be changed to next year?

- It may be possible to include some more material in the course, somewhat depending on the QFT course.»
- Nothing in particular, though looking through the program plan for next reading year, it seems that there might be some overlap between the courses Modern astrophysics, Gravitation and cosmology, Astroparticle physics and Galaxies and observational cosmology. This is obviously inevitable to some extent, maybe things are done in different levels of mathematical detail etc., but maybe the differences could be clarified (a bit of a clearer focus for each course, perhaps) and the overlap possibly adjusted.»

16. Additional comments

- All in all a very good course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från