ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Industrial Energy Equipment, KVM071

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-02-28 - 2011-03-20
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 8%
Around 20 hours/week»5 41%
Around 25 hours/week»5 41%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 16%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 33%
100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- All of the project time, but not all of the lectures» (100%)
- almost» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 11%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- THERE WAS STUFF IN THE EXAM THAT WAS NOT IN THE READING MATERIAL!!!» (?)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.33

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- There was usually good available help at the scheduled project hours.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»2 16%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»1 8%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 8%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- The lecture powerpoints were sometimes posted a little late.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 33%
Very good»6 50%
I did not seek help»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- The project teacher had an open door policy, which made it easy to get help.» (Very good)
- Easy to get help both by asking in person and through email.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»2 16%
Very well»9 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»7 58%
High»3 25%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I don"t see the point about re-doing more than 2 times a project just to pass it or the logic of getting in the same week 2 new projects..» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 41%
High»5 41%
Too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- the extra week was essential to make a good result, it would have been high workload otherwise » (Adequate)
- I have three courses» (Too high)
- The project section must really be revised!!» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»1 8%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»2 16%
Good»6 50%
Excellent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The projects which were very helpful for the learning. Good that the first project was short (2h). »
- I attended to few lectures etc. to know»
- Projects»
- The projects are in my opinion very useful and the examination clearly had its greatest emphasis on project skills. »
- The projects.»
- the projects is good. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I attended to few lectures etc. to know»
- Lectures not always really useful...»
- More of dynamism in the courses !»
- There should be exercises with solutions. It was very hard to study for the exam since the projects were the only thing to look at. It would have been a lot better to actually do some calculations by hand before the exam. There were som problems in the book but without solutions, so if you make a mistake somewhere it"s hard to find it.»
- the reading material is rather unorganized and poor. there is a lot of type errors. it seem that there was not sufficient information in the calculation example in the heatpump part...»

16. Additional comments

- .»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.44

Kursutvärderingssystem från