ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to Sound and Vibration 2011, VTA121

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-04 - 2011-03-25
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Patrik Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»1 11%
Around 25 hours/week»6 66%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Otroligt svårt att säga.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 66%
100%»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

3. How large part of the project presentation and supervision times offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
33%»0 0%
66%»2 22%
100%»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus (see https://www.student.chalmers.se//sp/course?course_id=14360) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. To what extent do you feel you have acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes stated in the learning outcomes?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 85%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Har ej läst målen» (?)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 25%
Yes, definitely»1 12%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent have Patrik Andersson"s lectures been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Tyckte ofta att det var svårt att förstå teorin på föreläsningarna, kände inte att jag hade tillräckligt mycket bakgrundskunskap.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent have Lars Ivarsson"s lectures been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»3 37%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

9. To what extent have Pontus Thorsson"s lectures been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Bra och lätt att förstå den praktiska tillämpningen.» (Large extent)

10. To what extent have the project presentation/supervision by Carsten Hoever been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. To what extent have the lecture notes been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Bra föreläsningsanteckningar som grundligt beskriver ämnena.» (Large extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Project work

13. How do you judge the level of difficulty of the project work?

9 svarande

much too difficult»0 0%
a bit too difficult»3 33%
adequate»6 66%
a bit too easy»0 0%
much too easy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The first project was really hard, because we didn"t know anything about what we were supposed to hand in, we just got a lot of graphs during the lab and then just guessed which one we had to use in the report. And there was not that much information in the lecture notes about it either. Otherwise, good. » (a bit too difficult)

14. Was the time period assigned for the project work sufficient?

The time period was...

9 svarande

much too short.»0 0%
a bit too short.»4 44%
adequate.»5 55%
a bit too long.»0 0%
much too long.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- A lot of time was spent on this!» (a bit too short.)

15. To what extent have the project work been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»7 77%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3

16. How was the procedure of the correction and grading of the project work reports?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Laboratory work

These question only concern courses with laboratory work.

17. To what extent did the laboratory work help your learning process?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

18. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?

8 svarande

It was well prepared»8 100%
There is a need for improvement / please comment»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

19. How helpful was the supervision?

8 svarande

very helpful»4 50%
moderatly helpful»4 50%
not helpful at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Study climate

20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the lecturer?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

21. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistant?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

22. How well has the cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 22%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»3 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

23. How was the workload of the course?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»5 55%
High»3 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- The project work took a lot of time (to a large extent this was due to report writing and not actually the task at hand).» (High)

24. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low

9 svarande

Low»2 22%
Adequate»2 22%
High»5 55%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Summarizing questions

25. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 22%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4

26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lab was good and interesting.»
- Project work 2-4»
- It"s a good course. You get a good overview. The project works are really good but take a little bit to much time. »

27. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe a little much report writing, perhaps some of the tasks can be made more like just tasks?»
- More connection between project work and lectures. Less derivations during the lectures. More calculation of real cases.»
- More real life examples would be appriciated. »

28. Additional comments

- The information about the teaching language at the website of the student portal is wrong»

Kursutvärderingssystem från