Visa resultat

Heat and Power Engineering Systems, MEN120

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		3		14%
Around 20 hours/week»		10		47%
Around 25 hours/week»		4		19%
Around 30 hours/week»		4		19%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		4%
50%»		1		4%
75%»		10		47%
100%»		9		42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

I have not seen/read the goals»		5		23%
The goals are difficult to understand»		1		4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		7		33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		8		38%

Genomsnitt: 2.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- have read but dont remember» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		17		100%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		5%
To some extent»		7		41%
Yes, definitely»		9		52%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- The theoretical questions were completely side-tracked: - About Fluidized bed (1 slide about it) - About IGCC (1 scheme about it) There"s way enough knowledge directly in link with the fundamental understanding of the subject (how a gas cycle/steam cycle works, and every efficiency consideration associated) Asking about two specific technologies that will certainly be obselete in 10 years sounds to me not relevant at all.» (No, not at all)
- The examination was more difficult than the goals suggest and more complex than previous years.» (To some extent)
- The theory part was just 15 points about a small detailed part in the whole course and then not really relevant of what we"ve actually learned during the program. » (To some extent)
- Maybe it was the exam syndrome but the exam problems (calculation part) was way too long for getting the results, that was very frustrating.» (Yes, definitely)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.85

Teaching and course administration

6. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some Extent»		3		14%
Large Extent»		15		71%
Great extent»		3		14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- some pictures in power point presentation were with bad resolution (difficult to see important parts) and not enough explained» (Some Extent)
- Ang. slides utdelade på föreläsningarna: Det är bättre att fylla hela den utskrivna sidan med fyra slides än med tre stycken och linjer för anteckningar bredvid. Man ser inte bilderna och texten blir för liten.» (Large Extent)

7. What was your overall impression of the lectures?

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		3		14%
Good»		13		61%
Excellent»		5		23%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Very interesting lectures and specially guest lectures were very good.» (Excellent)

8. What was your overall impression of the case study?

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		4		19%
Good»		11		52%
Excellent»		6		28%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- It was fun but to messy information, and hard to get started, I think you need to put all the information in the case compendium.» (Moderate)
- Unclear expectations for the first presentation.» (Moderate)
- A lot of work, interesting to some extent, but regarding the investment and the time load required, should be graduated (% of the final grade for instance)» (Moderate)
- Information om case study gick fram dåligt. Det borde lagts mer energi på information om hur projektet skulle gå till. T.ex. en tydlig beskrivning av vad som igår i projektet hade varit bra (not. den i häftet (Report) duger ej.) » (Good)
- It might be good idea to give some part of total grade for this case study work because it was so large. Now it is not motivate student if grade is only pass/fail..» (Good)
- Overall it was an excellent case study. I think it could be made a bit clearer that we"re more or less free to make any changes to the models we like - while still being realistic of course. From the beginning I thought that some of the parameters given in the framework model descriptions were "set in stone", but then it turned out that more or less none were. » (Excellent)

9. What did you think of the study visit at Nordjyllandverket?

Poor»		6		33%
Moderate»		0		0%
Good»		11		61%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- We were not there! But udevalla and rya was okay. Most of us have already been to places like this so it was okay but not much new.» (?)
- We didn"t visit nordjyllandverket, if you want me to take time to answer this form you should take time make it right» (Poor)
- We didn"t visit this Power Plant...» (Poor)
- Very good to see plants in operation, not only read about them!» (Good)
- (answered for our study visit, not Nordjyllandverket)» (Good)
- Well, going to Nordjyllandverket would"ve been really cool. But I think both Lillesjöverket and Rya were neat. » (Good)
- I guess you mean to Ryaverket and Uddevalla?» (Good)
- Not Nordjyllandverket this year :-)» (Good)
- but we didint visit that power plant, we visited two ther ones.» (Excellent)

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		8		38%
Large extent»		12		57%
Great extent»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

11. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		9%
Some extent»		8		38%
Large extent»		8		38%
Great extent»		3		14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- The book and case study were both very helpful in learning.» (Great extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Poor»		1		4%
Moderate»		2		9%
Good»		13		61%
Excellent»		5		23%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- Bad structured information.» (Poor)
- That the powerpoint slides are handed out at the lecture is great. » (Excellent)

Teaching staff and guest lecturers

13. Please rate Filip Johnssons lecture

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		9		50%
Good»		9		50%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I don"t really know who is who» (Good)

14. Please rate Klas Anderssons lecture

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		1		4%
Good»		15		71%
Excellent»		5		23%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- I don"t really know who is who» (Good)
- Sometimes explanations were too fast, but in general lectures were good and clear.» (Good)

15. Please rate Jan Kjaerstads lecture

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		10		55%
Good»		8		44%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- I don"t really know who is who» (Good)
- some problems with projector» (Good)

16. Please rate the guest lectures by Lars Strömberg

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		4		20%
Good»		13		65%
Excellent»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

17. Please rate the guest lecture by Pål Efsing

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		4		22%
Good»		13		72%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

18. Please rate Nicklas Simonssons Guest lecture

Poor»		3		15%
Moderate»		5		26%
Good»		10		52%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- it was a little bit to close to the exam for a unrelated lecture, we were very few who attended» (Good)

19. Please rate the tutoring during the case study

Poor»		1		4%
Moderate»		0		0%
Good»		14		66%
Excellent»		6		28%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- Often our questions regarding our models were left unanswered.» (Poor)
- good, but again, some info in the PP some in the case compendium, messy information.» (Good)
- the tutors were very helpful in answering questions, and were very approachable outside of e-studio time to answer questions » (Excellent)
- The staff were really helpful, knowledgeable and seemed interested. » (Excellent)
- it was good that we could fint techers at any time in theyr offices, questions through email were answered also wery fast.» (Excellent)

20. Please rate the tutoring during the calculation tutorials (räkneövningar)

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		6		33%
Good»		11		61%
Excellent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Haven"t used it» (Moderate)
- I didn"t really learn anything at these lessons, I had already done all the exercises by myself.» (Moderate)
- I think these calculation tutorial are a bit useless because the e-mail or "come by the office" system for help is good enough as well as the corrections provided on the website.» (Moderate)
- Didn"t attend. » (Good)
- i prefere to solve those problems during lecture, not to have explanation of solved problem. And i think there could be more calculation tutoring lectures, and we could solve more different kind of problems.» (Good)

Study climate

21. What did you think about the work load in the case study?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		11		52%
High»		9		42%
Too high»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- Raport writing was quite hard work..» (Adequate)
- As said previously, I would put "Adequate" if at the end it was granted but it"s unfortunately not.» (Too high)

22. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Poor»		0		0%
Moderate»		0		0%
Good»		8		38%
Excellent»		13		61%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

23. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Poor»		1		4%
Moderate»		1		4%
Good»		7		33%
Excellent»		12		57%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Lets say that my partner used the excuse that he didnt understand ebsilon and I had to do all by myself. Team work didnt work well for me.» (Poor)

24. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		5%
Adequate»		11		55%
High»		8		40%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

25. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		2		9%
Adequate»		10		47%
High»		8		38%
Too high»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Summarizing questions

26. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		14%
Good»		13		61%
Excellent»		5		23%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Some problems that I"ve written previously but in the whole, this is a good course with good teachers which taught me a lot. » (Good)

27. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

28. What should definitely be changed to next year?

29. Additional comments