Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Structural bioinformatics, lp3 VT11, TDA506

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-08 - 2011-03-24
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Rebecca S»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the
average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 50%
Around 25 hours/week»3 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- nearly 95%» (75%)
- good way of teaching» (100%)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by
the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 80%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

7. To what extent have the practical exercises been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

9. The course literature consisted of a set of research papers. How well did this form of course literature work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»5 83%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- some papers are difficult to understand» (Rather well)
- There are some of the research articles mentioned in reading articles but they cannot be freely accessed.we have to purchase dem » (Rather well)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 66%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Many things were limited to chalmers network. This became an issue at several times when the remote.studat machines were not working. » (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Question climate in lectures was very good. (A little less so with PGN.) More "Kemp-time" for practicals. Perhaps it need not be continuous, more like visiting the exam to check if ppl are stuck on something. » (Very good)

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help about the practical exercises?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Some more scheduled teaching time in the lab would have been good. » (Rather good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»1 16%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

14. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The many practicals were not mandatory but you needed to do them to fullfill the course goals (learning). » (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»1 16%
High»4 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 83%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- Course is good with good sylaabus but for some part the teacher can take in depth...the notes were good but very small number of points... » (Good)
- Even more emphasis on how the protein models both reflect and differ from the proteins and atoms in biology. More connection to practical appliances (medicine etc). » (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the last chapters with expert»
- Practicals and assignments. »
- the protein moedlling and drug designing part »

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more feedback on practicals»
- More assignments. Less written exam, it is so artificial as a test of skill and understanding. »
- The way of teaching can be made more impressive and some portions doesnt have absolutely nothing to read about..can add more text in handou than images Also importand thing the literature gievn for refferences some chapters(more than three) are paid literatures so that we cannot read... pls include literatute´,re which are free to read »

19. Additional comments

- we should have point for doing the practicals, could be also optional. »
- thank you for such a excellent teaching and kind heart to help Kemp you did a great job....exspecally the praticals your help were excellent..»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.66
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från